Review of Lumbosacral MR Neurography

IF 0.1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Valerie George, Mohammed Ismail, Luke Tilmans, Amna Ajam, Xuan Nguyen
{"title":"Review of Lumbosacral MR Neurography","authors":"Valerie George, Mohammed Ismail, Luke Tilmans, Amna Ajam, Xuan Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/01.CDR.0000992912.08184.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used for the evaluation of lumbosacral plexopathy and peripheral neuropathy.1 Although clinical evaluation and electroclinical studies are helpful in evaluating function, they are limited in their ability to characterize the underlying pathology. Electromyography is very sensitive for nerve injury but lacks specificity and cannot depict the level of anatomic detail often needed to localize the nerve lesion and for treatment planning.1 Furthermore, conventional imaging studies, such as MRI or CT, have a role in evaluating extrinsic structural abnormalities that may compress the nerves, such as retroperitoneal hematomas or pelvic abscesses, but are unable to adequately depict the lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerves due to limited imaging contrast between neural tissue and adjacent soft tissues.2 With advances in MR technology and acquisition technique, MRN has become a frequently requested advanced imaging modality for the detection of lumbosacral plexopathy and muscles and nonneural structures in the lumbar spine and pelvis.1,3","PeriodicalId":29694,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CDR.0000992912.08184.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used for the evaluation of lumbosacral plexopathy and peripheral neuropathy.1 Although clinical evaluation and electroclinical studies are helpful in evaluating function, they are limited in their ability to characterize the underlying pathology. Electromyography is very sensitive for nerve injury but lacks specificity and cannot depict the level of anatomic detail often needed to localize the nerve lesion and for treatment planning.1 Furthermore, conventional imaging studies, such as MRI or CT, have a role in evaluating extrinsic structural abnormalities that may compress the nerves, such as retroperitoneal hematomas or pelvic abscesses, but are unable to adequately depict the lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerves due to limited imaging contrast between neural tissue and adjacent soft tissues.2 With advances in MR technology and acquisition technique, MRN has become a frequently requested advanced imaging modality for the detection of lumbosacral plexopathy and muscles and nonneural structures in the lumbar spine and pelvis.1,3
腰骶部磁共振神经成像回顾
磁共振神经成像(MRN)越来越多地用于评估腰骶部神经丛病和周围神经病变。1 虽然临床评估和临床电学研究有助于评估功能,但它们在描述潜在病理特征方面能力有限。肌电图对神经损伤非常敏感,但缺乏特异性,而且无法描述神经病变定位和治疗计划所需的解剖细节。此外,核磁共振成像或 CT 等传统成像检查在评估可能压迫神经的外在结构异常(如腹膜后血肿或盆腔脓肿)方面具有一定作用,但由于神经组织与邻近软组织之间的成像对比度有限,因此无法充分描绘腰骶丛和周围神经。随着 MR 技术和采集技术的进步,MRN 已成为检测腰骶神经丛病、腰椎和骨盆的肌肉和非神经结构的常用先进成像模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信