Valerie George, Mohammed Ismail, Luke Tilmans, Amna Ajam, Xuan Nguyen
{"title":"Review of Lumbosacral MR Neurography","authors":"Valerie George, Mohammed Ismail, Luke Tilmans, Amna Ajam, Xuan Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/01.CDR.0000992912.08184.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used for the evaluation of lumbosacral plexopathy and peripheral neuropathy.1 Although clinical evaluation and electroclinical studies are helpful in evaluating function, they are limited in their ability to characterize the underlying pathology. Electromyography is very sensitive for nerve injury but lacks specificity and cannot depict the level of anatomic detail often needed to localize the nerve lesion and for treatment planning.1 Furthermore, conventional imaging studies, such as MRI or CT, have a role in evaluating extrinsic structural abnormalities that may compress the nerves, such as retroperitoneal hematomas or pelvic abscesses, but are unable to adequately depict the lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerves due to limited imaging contrast between neural tissue and adjacent soft tissues.2 With advances in MR technology and acquisition technique, MRN has become a frequently requested advanced imaging modality for the detection of lumbosacral plexopathy and muscles and nonneural structures in the lumbar spine and pelvis.1,3","PeriodicalId":29694,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"39 3","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CDR.0000992912.08184.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used for the evaluation of lumbosacral plexopathy and peripheral neuropathy.1 Although clinical evaluation and electroclinical studies are helpful in evaluating function, they are limited in their ability to characterize the underlying pathology. Electromyography is very sensitive for nerve injury but lacks specificity and cannot depict the level of anatomic detail often needed to localize the nerve lesion and for treatment planning.1 Furthermore, conventional imaging studies, such as MRI or CT, have a role in evaluating extrinsic structural abnormalities that may compress the nerves, such as retroperitoneal hematomas or pelvic abscesses, but are unable to adequately depict the lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerves due to limited imaging contrast between neural tissue and adjacent soft tissues.2 With advances in MR technology and acquisition technique, MRN has become a frequently requested advanced imaging modality for the detection of lumbosacral plexopathy and muscles and nonneural structures in the lumbar spine and pelvis.1,3