¿Es posible alcanzar el objetivo de catéteres propuesto por las guías? Razones que determinan el uso de catéter en pacientes prevalentes en hemodiálisis

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
{"title":"¿Es posible alcanzar el objetivo de catéteres propuesto por las guías? Razones que determinan el uso de catéter en pacientes prevalentes en hemodiálisis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nefro.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the recommendations of the clinical guidelines, the percentage of central venous catheters (CVC) continues to be above the recommended standards. We do not know whether the increasing use of catheters is due to unavoidable or avoidable factors and, in the latter case, it would be in our power to modify these results.</p><p>The aim of this study was to analyze the causes that condition the use of CVC in a prevalent hemodialysis (HD) population in order to identify those modifiable factors on which to act in order to achieve the objectives of the guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective, descriptive and observational study in all prevalent patients on chronic hemodialysis belonging to seven hemodialysis centers in Madrid, Castilla y León and Galicia in a cross-sectional study carried out in June 2021 (637 patients). The following were analyzed: age, sex, nationality, etiology of CKD, the vascular access with which they started hemodialysis, the number of previous failed arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), time since the start of HD, time since the placement of the CVC for the first time, the situation with respect to surgery and the causes of being a CVC carrier. In patients whose cause was refusal to undergo AVF, patients were asked about the cause of the refusal by directed questioning.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 637 patients studied, 255 (40%) had a CVC, 346 had an AVF (54.3%) and 36 (5.7%) had a prosthesis. Of the 255 patients with CVC, 20.4% (52 patients) were awaiting vascular access (AVF/prosthesis), 10.2% (26 patients) had an AVF but could not be used and 69.4% (177 patients) were not considered candidates for surgery (due to vascular surgery (16.9%; 43 patients), nephrology (16.5%, 42 patients) and patient refusal (36%; 92 patients). The most frequent cause for refusal of AVF was fear and patient preference. One of the most important factors associated with CVC use in prevalent patients was having started hemodialysis with a CVC. The greatest use of CVC at the start of HD was significantly associated with having more than one AVF performed or starting HD urgently and not having been followed up and evaluated in the ACKD consultation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is a high percentage of patients with a central venous catheter due to modifiable causes, which makes it necessary to systematically evaluate the process of creating AVF in order to enhance the planning, creation and maintenance of vascular access from the ACKD clinic, and to achieve the objective of the guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18997,"journal":{"name":"Nefrologia","volume":"44 5","pages":"Pages 700-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523001923/pdfft?md5=0fff231597c8f510f752854c4820974b&pid=1-s2.0-S0211699523001923-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523001923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the recommendations of the clinical guidelines, the percentage of central venous catheters (CVC) continues to be above the recommended standards. We do not know whether the increasing use of catheters is due to unavoidable or avoidable factors and, in the latter case, it would be in our power to modify these results.

The aim of this study was to analyze the causes that condition the use of CVC in a prevalent hemodialysis (HD) population in order to identify those modifiable factors on which to act in order to achieve the objectives of the guidelines.

Methods

Retrospective, descriptive and observational study in all prevalent patients on chronic hemodialysis belonging to seven hemodialysis centers in Madrid, Castilla y León and Galicia in a cross-sectional study carried out in June 2021 (637 patients). The following were analyzed: age, sex, nationality, etiology of CKD, the vascular access with which they started hemodialysis, the number of previous failed arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), time since the start of HD, time since the placement of the CVC for the first time, the situation with respect to surgery and the causes of being a CVC carrier. In patients whose cause was refusal to undergo AVF, patients were asked about the cause of the refusal by directed questioning.

Results

Of the 637 patients studied, 255 (40%) had a CVC, 346 had an AVF (54.3%) and 36 (5.7%) had a prosthesis. Of the 255 patients with CVC, 20.4% (52 patients) were awaiting vascular access (AVF/prosthesis), 10.2% (26 patients) had an AVF but could not be used and 69.4% (177 patients) were not considered candidates for surgery (due to vascular surgery (16.9%; 43 patients), nephrology (16.5%, 42 patients) and patient refusal (36%; 92 patients). The most frequent cause for refusal of AVF was fear and patient preference. One of the most important factors associated with CVC use in prevalent patients was having started hemodialysis with a CVC. The greatest use of CVC at the start of HD was significantly associated with having more than one AVF performed or starting HD urgently and not having been followed up and evaluated in the ACKD consultation.

Conclusions

There is a high percentage of patients with a central venous catheter due to modifiable causes, which makes it necessary to systematically evaluate the process of creating AVF in order to enhance the planning, creation and maintenance of vascular access from the ACKD clinic, and to achieve the objective of the guidelines.

是否有可能达到指南提出的导管使用目标?普遍血液透析患者使用导管的原因
导言尽管有临床指南的建议,但中心静脉导管(CVC)的使用比例仍高于建议标准。本研究的目的是分析血液透析(HD)患者使用中心静脉导管的原因,以便找出可改变的因素,从而实现指南的目标。方法对马德里、卡斯蒂利亚-莱昂和加利西亚的七个血液透析中心的所有慢性血液透析患者进行回顾性、描述性和观察性研究,并于 2021 年 6 月进行了一项横断面研究(637 名患者)。研究分析了以下内容:年龄、性别、国籍、慢性肾脏病的病因、开始血液透析时的血管通路、之前失败的动静脉内瘘 (AVF) 的数量、开始血液透析的时间、首次置入 CVC 的时间、手术情况以及成为 CVC 携带者的原因。对于拒绝接受 AVF 的患者,则通过定向提问的方式询问患者拒绝接受的原因。在 255 名使用 CVC 的患者中,20.4%(52 名患者)正在等待血管通路(AVF/假体),10.2%(26 名患者)拥有 AVF 但无法使用,69.4%(177 名患者)被认为不适合手术(原因包括血管外科(16.9%,43 名患者)、肾脏内科(16.5%,42 名患者)和患者拒绝(36%,92 名患者))。拒绝动静脉瘘最常见的原因是恐惧和患者的偏好。在流行病患者中,与使用 CVC 相关的最重要因素之一是已开始使用 CVC 进行血液透析。在开始血液透析时使用 CVC 最多的患者与进行过一次以上 AVF 或紧急开始血液透析以及未在 ACKD 诊所进行随访和评估有很大关系。结论由于可改变的原因,使用中心静脉导管的患者比例很高,因此有必要对 AVF 的创建过程进行系统评估,以加强 ACKD 诊所血管通路的规划、创建和维护,实现指南的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nefrologia
Nefrologia 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Nefrología is the official publication of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. The Journal publishes articles on basic or clinical research relating to nephrology, arterial hypertension, dialysis and kidney transplants. It is governed by the peer review system and all original papers are subject to internal assessment and external reviews. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信