Mononuclear cell therapy of neonatal hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy in preclinical versus clinical studies: A systematic analysis of therapeutic efficacy and study design

Neuroprotection Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1002/nep3.29
Alexander M. Scrutton, Francesca Ollis, Johannes Boltze
{"title":"Mononuclear cell therapy of neonatal hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy in preclinical versus clinical studies: A systematic analysis of therapeutic efficacy and study design","authors":"Alexander M. Scrutton, Francesca Ollis, Johannes Boltze","doi":"10.1002/nep3.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a devastating condition affecting around 8.5 in 1000 newborns globally. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) can reduce mortality and, to a limited extent, disability after HIE. Nevertheless, there is a need for new and effective treatment strategies. Cell‐based treatments using mononuclear cells (MNCs), which can be sourced from umbilical cord blood, are currently being investigated. Despite promising preclinical results, there is currently no strong indicator for the clinical efficacy of the approach. This analysis aimed to provide potential explanations for this discrepancy.A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. Preclinical and clinical studies were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov using a predefined search strategy. A total of 17 preclinical and 7 clinical studies were included. We analyzed overall MNC efficacy in preclinical trials, the methodological quality of preclinical trials, and relevant design features in preclinical versus clinical trials.There was evidence for MNC therapeutic efficacy in preclinical models of HIE. The methodological quality of preclinical studies was not optimal, and statistical design quality was particularly poor. However, methodological quality was above the standard in other fields. There were significant differences in preclinical versus clinical study design including the use of TH as a baseline treatment (only in clinical studies) and much higher MNC doses being applied in preclinical studies.Based on the analyzed data, it is unlikely that therapeutic effect size is massively overestimated in preclinical studies. It is more plausible that the many design differences between preclinical and clinical trials are responsible for the so far lacking proof of the efficacy of MNC treatments in HIE. Additional preclinical and clinical research is required to optimize the application of MNC for experimental HIE treatment.","PeriodicalId":505813,"journal":{"name":"Neuroprotection","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroprotection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nep3.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a devastating condition affecting around 8.5 in 1000 newborns globally. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) can reduce mortality and, to a limited extent, disability after HIE. Nevertheless, there is a need for new and effective treatment strategies. Cell‐based treatments using mononuclear cells (MNCs), which can be sourced from umbilical cord blood, are currently being investigated. Despite promising preclinical results, there is currently no strong indicator for the clinical efficacy of the approach. This analysis aimed to provide potential explanations for this discrepancy.A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. Preclinical and clinical studies were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov using a predefined search strategy. A total of 17 preclinical and 7 clinical studies were included. We analyzed overall MNC efficacy in preclinical trials, the methodological quality of preclinical trials, and relevant design features in preclinical versus clinical trials.There was evidence for MNC therapeutic efficacy in preclinical models of HIE. The methodological quality of preclinical studies was not optimal, and statistical design quality was particularly poor. However, methodological quality was above the standard in other fields. There were significant differences in preclinical versus clinical study design including the use of TH as a baseline treatment (only in clinical studies) and much higher MNC doses being applied in preclinical studies.Based on the analyzed data, it is unlikely that therapeutic effect size is massively overestimated in preclinical studies. It is more plausible that the many design differences between preclinical and clinical trials are responsible for the so far lacking proof of the efficacy of MNC treatments in HIE. Additional preclinical and clinical research is required to optimize the application of MNC for experimental HIE treatment.
新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的临床前与临床研究中的单核细胞疗法:疗效和研究设计的系统分析
缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)是一种破坏性疾病,全球每 1000 名新生儿中就有 8.5 人受到影响。治疗性低温疗法(TH)可降低 HIE 的死亡率,并在一定程度上减轻其致残率。尽管如此,我们仍需要新的有效治疗策略。目前正在研究使用单核细胞(MNCs)的细胞治疗方法,这种细胞可来自脐带血。尽管临床前研究结果令人鼓舞,但目前还没有强有力的指标来证明这种方法的临床疗效。根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis)指南,我们进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。采用预定义的检索策略,从 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 clinicaltrials.gov 检索了临床前和临床研究。共纳入了 17 项临床前研究和 7 项临床研究。我们分析了临床前试验中 MNC 的总体疗效、临床前试验的方法学质量以及临床前试验与临床试验的相关设计特点。临床前研究的方法质量并不理想,统计设计质量尤其差。不过,方法质量高于其他领域的标准。临床前研究与临床研究的设计存在明显差异,包括使用 TH 作为基线治疗(仅在临床研究中使用),以及临床前研究中使用的 MNC 剂量要高得多。临床前研究和临床试验在设计上存在许多差异,这可能是迄今为止 MNC 治疗 HIE 的疗效缺乏证据的原因。需要开展更多临床前和临床研究,以优化 MNC 在 HIE 治疗实验中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信