Patient's Perspective for their Non-Urgent Presentations to the Emergency Department in Najran City

Faisal Hussein Alkhaywani, Ali Yahia Ali Alsalah, Hassan Yahia Ali Alsalah, Ali Muhammad Yahya Al-Khaiwani, Tareq Husain Alqanas, Ali Naser Almurdef, Saud Daghman Hussain Al daghman, Hamad Mahdi Ali Al Zaman, Atheer Abdullah Alqarni
{"title":"Patient's Perspective for their Non-Urgent Presentations to the Emergency Department in Najran City","authors":"Faisal Hussein Alkhaywani, Ali Yahia Ali Alsalah, Hassan Yahia Ali Alsalah, Ali Muhammad Yahya Al-Khaiwani, Tareq Husain Alqanas, Ali Naser Almurdef, Saud Daghman Hussain Al daghman, Hamad Mahdi Ali Al Zaman, Atheer Abdullah Alqarni","doi":"10.5742/mewfm.2023.95256218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of Study: To explore patients’ perspectives regarding the reasons why some less urgent, or non-urgent patients prefer to attend emergency departments (EDs) instead of using other more appropriate healthcare services. Methods: This study followed a quantitative cross-sectional design. The study obtained and analyzed emergency attendance data from King Khalid Hospital, Najran City. A study questionnaire was designed by the researcher to interview 400 ED patients, who inappropriately attended the ED, to identify the reasons for their inappropriate attendance to the ED. Data collection was performed during the period of two months (November-December, 2022) to explore the proportions of different attendances that were deemed inappropriate according to the hospital’s followed triage system. The interviews were conducted with the non-urgent and less urgent patients during their waiting times. Results: The age of 18.3% of patients were <30 years old, while 28.5% were 30-39 years old. More than half of the participants’ visits were non-urgent, while 43.25% were less-urgent, 55.3% of patients visited the ED before due to similar complaints, and 46% visited a primary health care center before their ED visits. The main reasons for visiting the ED instead of the primary healthcare center (PHCC) were to save time (49.3%) and to get an earlier appointment (48%). Patients’ triage levels differed significantly according to their age groups (p<0.001), nationality (p=0.022), educational level (p=0.022), marital status (p=0.002), ED visits due to similar complaints (p<0.001), and previously visiting the PHCC for the current health problem (p=0.002). Triage levels also differed significantly according to some reasons for choosing to go to the ED instead of the PHCC, especially to get an earlier appointment (p=0.044), preferring the healthcare services provided by the ED (p=0.005), having a nearby ED (p=0.001), or being at the hospital at that time (p=0.002). Conclusions: There is a clear relationship between inappropriate ED visits and certain associated factors, indicating that prevention would be best targeted to certain categories, such as Saudi, younger, and educated patients. The main reasons for inappropriate ED visits are to save time and to avoid getting a late appointment. Recommendations: This study emphasized the importance of implementing proper health education and redirecting patients with inappropriate ED visits. Conducting a detailed analysis of the shortages in the utilization of primary healthcare resources is a pressing necessity. Further nationwide studies on patients’ perspective for non-urgent ED presentations are largely needed. Key Words: Emergency Department, Triage, Quantitative Research, Najran City, Saudi Arabia","PeriodicalId":23895,"journal":{"name":"World Family Medicine Journal /Middle East Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"169 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Family Medicine Journal /Middle East Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5742/mewfm.2023.95256218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of Study: To explore patients’ perspectives regarding the reasons why some less urgent, or non-urgent patients prefer to attend emergency departments (EDs) instead of using other more appropriate healthcare services. Methods: This study followed a quantitative cross-sectional design. The study obtained and analyzed emergency attendance data from King Khalid Hospital, Najran City. A study questionnaire was designed by the researcher to interview 400 ED patients, who inappropriately attended the ED, to identify the reasons for their inappropriate attendance to the ED. Data collection was performed during the period of two months (November-December, 2022) to explore the proportions of different attendances that were deemed inappropriate according to the hospital’s followed triage system. The interviews were conducted with the non-urgent and less urgent patients during their waiting times. Results: The age of 18.3% of patients were <30 years old, while 28.5% were 30-39 years old. More than half of the participants’ visits were non-urgent, while 43.25% were less-urgent, 55.3% of patients visited the ED before due to similar complaints, and 46% visited a primary health care center before their ED visits. The main reasons for visiting the ED instead of the primary healthcare center (PHCC) were to save time (49.3%) and to get an earlier appointment (48%). Patients’ triage levels differed significantly according to their age groups (p<0.001), nationality (p=0.022), educational level (p=0.022), marital status (p=0.002), ED visits due to similar complaints (p<0.001), and previously visiting the PHCC for the current health problem (p=0.002). Triage levels also differed significantly according to some reasons for choosing to go to the ED instead of the PHCC, especially to get an earlier appointment (p=0.044), preferring the healthcare services provided by the ED (p=0.005), having a nearby ED (p=0.001), or being at the hospital at that time (p=0.002). Conclusions: There is a clear relationship between inappropriate ED visits and certain associated factors, indicating that prevention would be best targeted to certain categories, such as Saudi, younger, and educated patients. The main reasons for inappropriate ED visits are to save time and to avoid getting a late appointment. Recommendations: This study emphasized the importance of implementing proper health education and redirecting patients with inappropriate ED visits. Conducting a detailed analysis of the shortages in the utilization of primary healthcare resources is a pressing necessity. Further nationwide studies on patients’ perspective for non-urgent ED presentations are largely needed. Key Words: Emergency Department, Triage, Quantitative Research, Najran City, Saudi Arabia
纳季兰市急诊科非急诊患者的观点
研究目的:从病人的角度探讨一些不太紧急或非紧急的病人为何宁愿到急诊科就诊,而不使用其他更合适的医疗服务。研究方法本研究采用定量横断面设计。研究获取并分析了纳季兰市哈立德国王医院的急诊就诊数据。研究人员设计了一份研究问卷,对 400 名不当就诊的急诊科患者进行了访谈,以确定他们不当就诊的原因。数据收集工作在两个月期间(2022 年 11 月至 12 月)进行,以探讨根据医院的后续分诊系统被视为不当就诊的不同就诊比例。在非急诊和不太急诊病人的候诊时间内对他们进行了访谈。结果显示18.3%的患者年龄小于30岁,28.5%的患者年龄在30-39岁之间。55.3%的患者曾因类似主诉到急诊室就诊,46%的患者在到急诊室就诊前曾到基层医疗中心就诊。到急诊室而不是初级保健中心就诊的主要原因是节省时间(49.3%)和提前预约(48%)。患者的分流水平因年龄组(p<0.001)、国籍(p=0.022)、教育程度(p=0.022)、婚姻状况(p=0.002)、因类似主诉而到急诊室就诊(p<0.001)以及曾因当前健康问题到初级保健中心就诊(p=0.002)而有显著差异。选择去急诊室而不是初级保健中心的原因也会导致分流水平的显著差异,尤其是为了更早地预约(p=0.044)、更喜欢急诊室提供的医疗服务(p=0.005)、附近有急诊室(p=0.001)或当时正在医院(p=0.002)。结论不适当的急诊室就诊与某些相关因素之间存在明显的关系,这表明最好针对某些类别的患者(如沙特人、年轻人和受过教育的患者)采取预防措施。不适当去急诊室就诊的主要原因是为了节省时间和避免迟到。建议:本研究强调了开展适当的健康教育和重新引导不适当急诊室就诊患者的重要性。对基层医疗资源利用率不足的问题进行详细分析是当务之急。我们还需要在全国范围内进一步研究患者对非急诊急诊就诊的看法。关键字急诊科、分诊、定量研究、沙特阿拉伯奈季兰市
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信