Representation and Partisanship: What Determines the Topics That Members of Parliament Prioritize in Communications with Their Constituents?

Alex Marland, Feodor Snagovsky
{"title":"Representation and Partisanship: What Determines the Topics That Members of Parliament Prioritize in Communications with Their Constituents?","authors":"Alex Marland, Feodor Snagovsky","doi":"10.1017/S0008423923000641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract What determines how Members of Parliament (MPs) and their staff frame their communications with all constituents in their electoral district? Prior research has suggested that constituency operations are one of the last bastions of freedom that MPs have from the full grasp of party discipline in Canada. If this remains true, MP communications with their constituents should reflect the MPs’ background or the constituency context and not their political partisanship. We collected a sample of published newsletters (“householders”) that Canadian MPs’ offices sent to all households in their electoral districts during the COVID-19 pandemic. We supplement our analysis with original insights about householders from a selection of MPs and their staff. Our results suggest that in a system of strict party discipline, the most important predictor of what MPs include in their constituent communications is indeed partisanship. The results inform our understanding of democratic representation, centralized co-ordination and political communication, and the pervasiveness of partisan messaging in Canada.","PeriodicalId":9491,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","volume":"4 11","pages":"848 - 870"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract What determines how Members of Parliament (MPs) and their staff frame their communications with all constituents in their electoral district? Prior research has suggested that constituency operations are one of the last bastions of freedom that MPs have from the full grasp of party discipline in Canada. If this remains true, MP communications with their constituents should reflect the MPs’ background or the constituency context and not their political partisanship. We collected a sample of published newsletters (“householders”) that Canadian MPs’ offices sent to all households in their electoral districts during the COVID-19 pandemic. We supplement our analysis with original insights about householders from a selection of MPs and their staff. Our results suggest that in a system of strict party discipline, the most important predictor of what MPs include in their constituent communications is indeed partisanship. The results inform our understanding of democratic representation, centralized co-ordination and political communication, and the pervasiveness of partisan messaging in Canada.
代表与党派:是什么决定了议员在与选民沟通时优先考虑哪些话题?
摘要 是什么决定了国会议员及其工作人员如何与选区内的所有选民进行沟通?先前的研究表明,在加拿大,选区运作是国会议员不受政党纪律全面控制的最后自由堡垒之一。如果这一观点成立,那么国会议员与选民的沟通就应该反映国会议员的背景或选区环境,而不是他们的政治党派。我们收集了加拿大国会议员办公室在 COVID-19 大流行期间向其选区所有家庭发送的已出版通讯("householders")样本。我们还从部分国会议员及其工作人员那里获得了关于住户的原始见解,以此补充我们的分析。我们的研究结果表明,在严格的党纪制度下,预测国会议员在与选民的沟通中包含哪些内容的最重要因素确实是党派立场。这些结果有助于我们理解加拿大的民主代表制、集中协调和政治沟通,以及党派信息的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信