Peranan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek

Muhammad Anwar Ibrahim, Gema Permana Rahman, Taufiqurrohman Syahuri
{"title":"Peranan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek","authors":"Muhammad Anwar Ibrahim, Gema Permana Rahman, Taufiqurrohman Syahuri","doi":"10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As time goes by and the development of law in Indonesia, the trademark has become a symbol that has been integrated in the life of society. Given the importance of a brand, the brand must get a protection from each country. Protection of a trademark in Indonesia is regulated in Act No. 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, one of the materials regulated in the Act is about the settlement of trademark disputes. The settlement of trademark disputes is resolved by two judicial bodies, namely the Commercial Court and the State Administrative Court. This research uses a normative juridical approach method with descriptive analytical analysis of legal materials. The results of this study found that the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) is to examine, decide and resolve State Administrative disputes (TUN) in a dispute arising in the field of State Administrative law (TUN) between persons or civil law entities (members of the public) with agencies or TUN officials (government) within the scope of the central government also includes local government as a result of the issuance of a TUN decision (beschikking). State Administrative Court has a very important role in resolving trademark disputes on the basis of registered trademark owners object to the decision to remove the registered trademark on the initiative of the Minister.","PeriodicalId":508876,"journal":{"name":"Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara","volume":"19 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As time goes by and the development of law in Indonesia, the trademark has become a symbol that has been integrated in the life of society. Given the importance of a brand, the brand must get a protection from each country. Protection of a trademark in Indonesia is regulated in Act No. 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, one of the materials regulated in the Act is about the settlement of trademark disputes. The settlement of trademark disputes is resolved by two judicial bodies, namely the Commercial Court and the State Administrative Court. This research uses a normative juridical approach method with descriptive analytical analysis of legal materials. The results of this study found that the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) is to examine, decide and resolve State Administrative disputes (TUN) in a dispute arising in the field of State Administrative law (TUN) between persons or civil law entities (members of the public) with agencies or TUN officials (government) within the scope of the central government also includes local government as a result of the issuance of a TUN decision (beschikking). State Administrative Court has a very important role in resolving trademark disputes on the basis of registered trademark owners object to the decision to remove the registered trademark on the initiative of the Minister.
国家行政法院在解决商标争议中的作用
随着时间的推移和印度尼西亚法律的发展,商标已成为融入社会生活的一个符号。鉴于品牌的重要性,品牌必须得到各国的保护。2016 年第 20 号《商标和地理标志法》对印度尼西亚的商标保护做出了规定,该法规定的材料之一是关于商标争议的解决。商标争议的解决由两个司法机构负责,即商事法院和国家行政法院。本研究采用规范法学方法,对法律材料进行描述性分析。研究结果表明,国家行政法院(PTUN)的职权是审查、裁决和解决国家行政争议(TUN),即中央政府范围内的个人或民事法律实体(公众)与机构或 TUN 官员(政府)之间因发布 TUN 决定(beschikking)而在国家行政法(TUN)领域产生的争议。国家行政法院在解决基于注册商标所有人对部长主动撤销注册商标的决定提出异议而产生的商标争议方面发挥着非常重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信