MODELING THE FINANCIAL PROVISIONS FOR PUBLIC WELFARE IN ALIGNMENT WITH PUBLIC BUDGETING PRIORITIES

Tetyana V. Zhyber, N. Rudyk
{"title":"MODELING THE FINANCIAL PROVISIONS FOR PUBLIC WELFARE IN ALIGNMENT WITH PUBLIC BUDGETING PRIORITIES","authors":"Tetyana V. Zhyber, N. Rudyk","doi":"10.31499/2616-5236.4(26).2023.291783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific article, derived from synthesizing international research findings, enriches our understanding of the intricate relationship between state budget allocations for public goods and the modeling of societal well-being. The study aims to standardize the calculation of public welfare expenditure indicators to prioritize budget allocations for public goods. Employing a conceptualization of public welfare in market-oriented countries, as well as scientific methods of synthesis, comparison, and graphic data analysis, the authors introduce an innovative approach to quantitatively assess and compare spending priorities of public financial resources on public welfare across nations. The study categorizes government expenditures according to an international classification into three models of public welfare, in addition to general state maintenance costs. These models range from basic protection and security (the first model) to the provision of public goods for economic freedom (the second model), culminating in the third model, which addresses contemporary complexities in ensuring population self-development and enhancing societal \"value\" through self-expression. Analysis reveals that, as of 2021, Ukraine allocated a substantial portion of its budget to support economic activity and government operations, especially in the context of anti-terrorism efforts and a modest economy, resulting in a reduced share of spending on self-improvement and social security compared to EU countries. The article underscores the significance of incorporating sustainability criteria in future research, aligning with the UN SDGs, when examining modern social welfare practices. This research adds to the ongoing discourse on optimizing budget strategies to enhance overall citizen welfare.","PeriodicalId":296128,"journal":{"name":"Economies' Horizons","volume":"79 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economies' Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31499/2616-5236.4(26).2023.291783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scientific article, derived from synthesizing international research findings, enriches our understanding of the intricate relationship between state budget allocations for public goods and the modeling of societal well-being. The study aims to standardize the calculation of public welfare expenditure indicators to prioritize budget allocations for public goods. Employing a conceptualization of public welfare in market-oriented countries, as well as scientific methods of synthesis, comparison, and graphic data analysis, the authors introduce an innovative approach to quantitatively assess and compare spending priorities of public financial resources on public welfare across nations. The study categorizes government expenditures according to an international classification into three models of public welfare, in addition to general state maintenance costs. These models range from basic protection and security (the first model) to the provision of public goods for economic freedom (the second model), culminating in the third model, which addresses contemporary complexities in ensuring population self-development and enhancing societal "value" through self-expression. Analysis reveals that, as of 2021, Ukraine allocated a substantial portion of its budget to support economic activity and government operations, especially in the context of anti-terrorism efforts and a modest economy, resulting in a reduced share of spending on self-improvement and social security compared to EU countries. The article underscores the significance of incorporating sustainability criteria in future research, aligning with the UN SDGs, when examining modern social welfare practices. This research adds to the ongoing discourse on optimizing budget strategies to enhance overall citizen welfare.
根据公共预算编制的优先事项,为公共福利的财政拨款建模
这篇科学文章综合了国际研究成果,丰富了我们对国家公共产品预算分配与社会福利模型之间错综复杂关系的理解。本研究旨在规范公共福利支出指标的计算,以确定公共产品预算分配的优先次序。作者运用市场导向型国家的公共福利概念,以及综合、比较和图形数据分析等科学方法,推出了一种创新方法,对各国公共财政资源在公共福利方面的支出重点进行量化评估和比较。除了一般的国家维护成本外,该研究根据国际分类法将政府支出分为三种公共福利模式。这些模式包括从基本保护和安全(第一种模式)到为经济自由提供公共产品(第二种模式),最后是第三种模式,它解决了当代确保人口自我发展和通过自我表达提高社会 "价值 "的复杂问题。分析显示,截至 2021 年,乌克兰将预算的很大一部分用于支持经济活动和政府运作,特别是在反恐努力和经济不景气的情况下,导致用于自我完善和社会保障的支出比例低于欧盟国家。文章强调了在未来的研究中,在考察现代社会福利实践时,根据联合国可持续发展目标纳入可持续性标准的重要性。这项研究为当前关于优化预算战略以提高公民整体福利的讨论增添了新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信