Comparison of compliance error compensation approaches for robotic manipulators with double encoders

A. Klimchik
{"title":"Comparison of compliance error compensation approaches for robotic manipulators with double encoders","authors":"A. Klimchik","doi":"10.1109/ROBIO58561.2023.10354557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the comparison analysis of build-in and model-based control strategies for robots with double encoders. Particular attention is paid to the efficiency evaluation of the related compliance error compensation techniques. Three different model-based control strategies were examined. It was shown that reduced stiffness model-based and joint-compliance-ratio-based strategies could compensate twice as much as built-in feedback control based on the secondary encoder and reduce 77% of positioning errors. The complete stiffness model achieved a 97% compliance error compensation level and regardless of its complexity, it is a reasonable approach for the robots involved in high-accuracy contact applications.","PeriodicalId":505134,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO)","volume":"8 3","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO58561.2023.10354557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with the comparison analysis of build-in and model-based control strategies for robots with double encoders. Particular attention is paid to the efficiency evaluation of the related compliance error compensation techniques. Three different model-based control strategies were examined. It was shown that reduced stiffness model-based and joint-compliance-ratio-based strategies could compensate twice as much as built-in feedback control based on the secondary encoder and reduce 77% of positioning errors. The complete stiffness model achieved a 97% compliance error compensation level and regardless of its complexity, it is a reasonable approach for the robots involved in high-accuracy contact applications.
带双编码器的机器人机械手的遵从误差补偿方法比较
本文对带有双编码器的机器人的内置控制策略和基于模型的控制策略进行了比较分析。其中特别关注了相关顺从误差补偿技术的效率评估。研究了三种不同的基于模型的控制策略。结果表明,基于减小刚度模型的控制策略和基于关节顺应比的控制策略的补偿效果是基于辅助编码器的内置反馈控制策略的两倍,可减少 77% 的定位误差。完整的刚度模型达到了 97% 的顺应性误差补偿水平,无论其复杂程度如何,对于参与高精度接触应用的机器人来说,这都是一种合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信