Új klasszicizálás vagy „másik modern”? Az átmenet narratívája Kotsis Iván városépítészetében és Balaton-parti munkásságában

Domonkos Wettstein
{"title":"Új klasszicizálás vagy „másik modern”? Az átmenet narratívája Kotsis Iván városépítészetében és Balaton-parti munkásságában","authors":"Domonkos Wettstein","doi":"10.61901/kellek.2023.69.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tendencies in 20th century architecture were determined by the relationship between the classical tradition of architecture and modernity. In the 1930s, modern architecture came to the fore more and more, but at the same time, both in international architecture and in Hungary, alternative efforts appeared that sought a dialogue between modern architecture, historical traditions and local specificities. This search for an alternative was present in modern architecture throughout the 20th century and is still effective today. The trends with different colors are characterized by the modern concept of the other in the written history of architectural theory. The purpose of this study is to present the interactions between the international and domestic tendencies of the “other modern” through the work of Iván Kotsis. Iván Kotsis was a significant figure in architecture between the two world wars, and in addition to his creative career, he was also a decisive character in the architectural education of the University of Applied Sciences. His views became guidelines for later generations. His work is illustrative to the transition between historicizing and modern architecture, while experimentation with local, regional character was also a decisive inspiration for him in this transition. He established close international relations with the dominant European architects of the era, including the Stuttgart School, classified as an alternative school, and the German architects Paul Schmitthenner and Paul Bonatz. In order to bring a contribution to the field of the history of architectural ideas, the study examines his creative concepts and the relationship between classical and modern architecture on the basis of his autobiography, archival publications and contemporary literature.","PeriodicalId":508302,"journal":{"name":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","volume":"3 5-6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61901/kellek.2023.69.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tendencies in 20th century architecture were determined by the relationship between the classical tradition of architecture and modernity. In the 1930s, modern architecture came to the fore more and more, but at the same time, both in international architecture and in Hungary, alternative efforts appeared that sought a dialogue between modern architecture, historical traditions and local specificities. This search for an alternative was present in modern architecture throughout the 20th century and is still effective today. The trends with different colors are characterized by the modern concept of the other in the written history of architectural theory. The purpose of this study is to present the interactions between the international and domestic tendencies of the “other modern” through the work of Iván Kotsis. Iván Kotsis was a significant figure in architecture between the two world wars, and in addition to his creative career, he was also a decisive character in the architectural education of the University of Applied Sciences. His views became guidelines for later generations. His work is illustrative to the transition between historicizing and modern architecture, while experimentation with local, regional character was also a decisive inspiration for him in this transition. He established close international relations with the dominant European architects of the era, including the Stuttgart School, classified as an alternative school, and the German architects Paul Schmitthenner and Paul Bonatz. In order to bring a contribution to the field of the history of architectural ideas, the study examines his creative concepts and the relationship between classical and modern architecture on the basis of his autobiography, archival publications and contemporary literature.
新古典主义还是 "另一种现代"?伊万-科奇斯的城市建筑及其巴拉顿湖畔作品中的转型叙事
20 世纪建筑的发展趋势取决于古典建筑传统与现代性之间的关系。20 世纪 30 年代,现代建筑越来越受到重视,但与此同时,在国际建筑界和匈牙利,也出现了寻求现代建筑、历史传统和地方特色之间对话的另类努力。在整个 20 世纪的现代建筑中,这种另辟蹊径的探索一直存在,直到今天依然有效。在书面的建筑理论史中,"他者 "这一现代概念体现了不同色彩趋势的特点。本研究的目的是通过 Iván Kotsis 的作品来展示 "另一种现代 "的国际和国内趋势之间的互动。伊万-科奇斯是两次世界大战期间建筑界的重要人物,除了他的创作生涯,他还是应用科学大学建筑教育的决定性人物。他的观点成为后世的准则。他的作品体现了历史化建筑与现代建筑之间的过渡,而在这一过渡过程中,对地方和区域特色的尝试也给了他决定性的启发。他与当时欧洲的主流建筑师建立了密切的国际关系,包括被列为另类流派的斯图加特学派,以及德国建筑师保罗-施密特亨纳(Paul Schmitthenner)和保罗-博纳茨(Paul Bonatz)。为了在建筑思想史领域做出贡献,本研究以他的自传、档案出版物和当代文献为基础,探讨了他的创作理念以及古典建筑与现代建筑之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信