Status Hukum Privatisasi Anak Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Di Bidang Usaha Sumber Daya Alam (Perkara Nomor 61/PUU-XVIII/2020)

Warkat Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.21776/warkat.v3n1.5
Hayyu Rahmanda Adi Nugroho, Reka Dewantara, Rumi Suwardiyati
{"title":"Status Hukum Privatisasi Anak Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Di Bidang Usaha Sumber Daya Alam (Perkara Nomor 61/PUU-XVIII/2020)","authors":"Hayyu Rahmanda Adi Nugroho, Reka Dewantara, Rumi Suwardiyati","doi":"10.21776/warkat.v3n1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research departs from the regulatory provisions regarding privatization of a subsidiary under State-owned Enterprises that are deemed to have a legal loophole that may lead to multiinterpretations because the existing regulation has not specifically governed this matter. Privatization of the subsidiary as mentioned above is intended to give legal protection to the members of the public in line with the statement ‘natural resources are controlled by the state for the benefits of the people’. With normative-juridical methods, statutory, case, and analytical approaches, this research aims to investigate whether the subsidiary under the State-owned Enterprises can be privatized by the Government and how the synchronization of the regulation governing privatization towards the State-owned Enterprises in natural resources is performed. The primary and secondary materials were analyzed using the library technique. The analysis referred to the A Contrario argumentative technique and systematic interpretation technique. This research concludes that the subsidiary under the state-owned Enterprises can be privatized as long as it does not deactivate the authority of the state to control the subsidiary to ensure that this approach is not deviating from the objective to bring the welfare to the people. Not only can the concept of the control of the state be seen based on private ownership but it may also involve policies, administration, regulation, management, and supervision for the welfare of all people.","PeriodicalId":510254,"journal":{"name":"Warkat","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Warkat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/warkat.v3n1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research departs from the regulatory provisions regarding privatization of a subsidiary under State-owned Enterprises that are deemed to have a legal loophole that may lead to multiinterpretations because the existing regulation has not specifically governed this matter. Privatization of the subsidiary as mentioned above is intended to give legal protection to the members of the public in line with the statement ‘natural resources are controlled by the state for the benefits of the people’. With normative-juridical methods, statutory, case, and analytical approaches, this research aims to investigate whether the subsidiary under the State-owned Enterprises can be privatized by the Government and how the synchronization of the regulation governing privatization towards the State-owned Enterprises in natural resources is performed. The primary and secondary materials were analyzed using the library technique. The analysis referred to the A Contrario argumentative technique and systematic interpretation technique. This research concludes that the subsidiary under the state-owned Enterprises can be privatized as long as it does not deactivate the authority of the state to control the subsidiary to ensure that this approach is not deviating from the objective to bring the welfare to the people. Not only can the concept of the control of the state be seen based on private ownership but it may also involve policies, administration, regulation, management, and supervision for the welfare of all people.
自然资源业务领域国有企业子公司私有化的法律地位(案件编号 61/PUU-XVIII/2020)
本研究偏离了有关国有企业下属子公司私有化的监管规定,因为现有的监管规定没有对这 一问题做出具体规定,因此被认为存在法律漏洞,可能导致多种解释。上述子公司私有化的目的是根据 "自然资源由国家控制,以造福人民 "的声明,为公众提供法律保护。本研究采用规范-法学方法、法定方法、案例方法和分析方法,旨在调查政府是否可以对国有企业下属子公司进行私有化,以及如何对自然资源领域的国有企业进行同步私有化。利用图书馆技术对主要和次要材料进行了分析。分析参考了 A Contrario 论证技术和系统解释技术。本研究得出结论,只要不削弱国家对子公司的控制权,确保这种做法不偏离为人民谋福利的目标,国有企业下属子公司就可以私有化。国家控制的概念不仅体现在私有制上,还可能涉及政策、行政、法规、管理和监督,以造福于全体人民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信