Analysis of Students' Errors in Solving HOTS Problems on Algebraic Materials Based on the Complexity Level of the Problem Based on Bloom's Theory

Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.37905/euler.v11i2.23053

Yulia Muliana, A. Abdillah, Mahsup Mahsup, S. Syaharuddin, Abdul-Lateef Olamide Ahmodu, M. M. Iddrisu

{"title":"Analysis of Students' Errors in Solving HOTS Problems on Algebraic Materials Based on the Complexity Level of the Problem Based on Bloom's Theory","authors":"Yulia Muliana, A. Abdillah, Mahsup Mahsup, S. Syaharuddin, Abdul-Lateef Olamide Ahmodu, M. M. Iddrisu","doi":"10.37905/euler.v11i2.23053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematics discusses a lot about various kinds of problems that contain numbers that are classified as Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Math HOTS questions require a high level of thinking to solve the problem. Based on Bloom's theory, HOTS consists of analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6). This study aims to determine the level of student errors in solving HOTS questions based on Bloom's theory. This research uses mixed method research, which is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, where the stages of this research include instrument development, instrument validation, data collection, data analysis and interpretation. The sample of this study used 25 students of class VIII junior high school in Mataram City. Researchers gave 10 essay questions that had been validated by material experts to students as research instruments. The results showed that students' understanding in solving HOTS problems was still lacking. For the error rate, it was found that there were no students who could solve the creating (C6) section with a percentage of 100% error, analyzing (C4) section with a percentage of 60%, evaluating (C5) 24%, applying (C3) 16%, understanding (C2) 12%, and in the remembering (C1) section there were no students who made mistakes with a percentage of 0% error. The biggest error was found in the creating part (C6), where the most mistakes were made by women with an average score of 50.55.","PeriodicalId":504964,"journal":{"name":"Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37905/euler.v11i2.23053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mathematics discusses a lot about various kinds of problems that contain numbers that are classified as Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Math HOTS questions require a high level of thinking to solve the problem. Based on Bloom's theory, HOTS consists of analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6). This study aims to determine the level of student errors in solving HOTS questions based on Bloom's theory. This research uses mixed method research, which is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, where the stages of this research include instrument development, instrument validation, data collection, data analysis and interpretation. The sample of this study used 25 students of class VIII junior high school in Mataram City. Researchers gave 10 essay questions that had been validated by material experts to students as research instruments. The results showed that students' understanding in solving HOTS problems was still lacking. For the error rate, it was found that there were no students who could solve the creating (C6) section with a percentage of 100% error, analyzing (C4) section with a percentage of 60%, evaluating (C5) 24%, applying (C3) 16%, understanding (C2) 12%, and in the remembering (C1) section there were no students who made mistakes with a percentage of 0% error. The biggest error was found in the creating part (C6), where the most mistakes were made by women with an average score of 50.55.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于布鲁姆理论，根据问题的复杂程度分析学生在解决代数材料中的 HOTS 问题时出现的错误

数学中经常讨论各种包含数字的问题，这些数字被归类为高阶思维技能（HOTS）。数学 HOTS 问题需要高水平的思维来解决问题。根据布鲁姆的理论，HOTS 包括分析（C4）、评价（C5）和创造（C6）。本研究旨在根据布鲁姆理论确定学生在解决 HOTS 问题时的错误程度。本研究采用混合法研究，即定性与定量相结合的方法，研究阶段包括工具开发、工具验证、数据收集、数据分析和解释。本研究的样本是马打兰市初中八年级的 25 名学生。研究人员向学生们提供了 10 道经过材料专家验证的作文题作为研究工具。结果表明，学生在解决 HOTS 问题时仍缺乏理解。在错误率方面，创造（C6）部分的错误率为100%，分析（C4）部分的错误率为60%，评价（C5）部分的错误率为24%，应用（C3）部分的错误率为16%，理解（C2）部分的错误率为12%，而在记忆（C1）部分，没有学生出错，错误率为0%。最大的错误出现在创建部分（C6），女性错误最多，平均得分 50.55 分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi

自引率

0.00%

发文量