Yield prediction of wheat at different sowing dates and irrigation regimes using the AquaCrop model

Belgin ALSANCAK SIRLI, Sema KALE ÇELİK, Hakan Yildiz, M. Aydoğdu
{"title":"Yield prediction of wheat at different sowing dates and irrigation regimes using the AquaCrop model","authors":"Belgin ALSANCAK SIRLI, Sema KALE ÇELİK, Hakan Yildiz, M. Aydoğdu","doi":"10.31015/jaefs.2023.4.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water efficiency models are playing an increasingly important role in helping agricultural activities adapt to climate change. AquaCrop is one of the models that can accurately correlate water-plant-climate parameters. In this study, the effects of irrigation strategies (I1; rainfed, I2; irrigation at Germination (G)+Tillering (T)+Heading (H) stages, I3; irrigation at G+H stages, I4; irrigation at G+T stages) and sowing dates (SD1; normal sowing date, SD2; late sowing date) on winter wheat yield and soil water conditions were investigated in semi-arid climate conditions. Biomass, grain yield, soil water content and crop canopy cover values observed in field conditions and simulated by AquaCrop. According to results SD1 did not have a negative effect on grain yield and biomass however SD2 would significantly reduce grain yield and biomass amount. Considering the biomass and grain yields in terms of irrigation, the highest yield was obtained in the irrigation water applied during the I2SD1 treatment. The yield reduction was 39% in rainfed treatments, 22% when irrigated in G+T periods, and 5% when irrigated in G+H stages. The model predicted 2-year grain yield and biomass values more accurately in SD1 than in SD2. The model predicted yield, biomass, soil moisture content and canopy cover values with an acceptable accuracy.","PeriodicalId":13814,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences","volume":"44 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2023.4.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water efficiency models are playing an increasingly important role in helping agricultural activities adapt to climate change. AquaCrop is one of the models that can accurately correlate water-plant-climate parameters. In this study, the effects of irrigation strategies (I1; rainfed, I2; irrigation at Germination (G)+Tillering (T)+Heading (H) stages, I3; irrigation at G+H stages, I4; irrigation at G+T stages) and sowing dates (SD1; normal sowing date, SD2; late sowing date) on winter wheat yield and soil water conditions were investigated in semi-arid climate conditions. Biomass, grain yield, soil water content and crop canopy cover values observed in field conditions and simulated by AquaCrop. According to results SD1 did not have a negative effect on grain yield and biomass however SD2 would significantly reduce grain yield and biomass amount. Considering the biomass and grain yields in terms of irrigation, the highest yield was obtained in the irrigation water applied during the I2SD1 treatment. The yield reduction was 39% in rainfed treatments, 22% when irrigated in G+T periods, and 5% when irrigated in G+H stages. The model predicted 2-year grain yield and biomass values more accurately in SD1 than in SD2. The model predicted yield, biomass, soil moisture content and canopy cover values with an acceptable accuracy.
利用 AquaCrop 模型预测不同播种期和灌溉制度下小麦的产量
水效率模型在帮助农业活动适应气候变化方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。AquaCrop 是能准确关联水-植物-气候参数的模型之一。本研究考察了半干旱气候条件下灌溉策略(I1;雨水灌溉,I2;发芽期(G)+耕作期(T)+拔节期(H)灌溉,I3;G+H期灌溉,I4;G+T期灌溉)和播种期(SD1;正常播种期,SD2;晚播种期)对冬小麦产量和土壤水分状况的影响。观察了田间生物量、谷物产量、土壤含水量和作物冠层覆盖值,并通过 AquaCrop 进行了模拟。结果表明,SD1 对谷物产量和生物量没有负面影响,但 SD2 会显著降低谷物产量和生物量。考虑到灌溉对生物量和谷物产量的影响,在 I2SD1 处理中灌溉水的产量最高。雨水灌溉处理减产 39%,G+T 期灌溉减产 22%,G+H 期灌溉减产 5%。与 SD2 相比,该模型更准确地预测了 SD1 的两年谷物产量和生物量值。该模型预测产量、生物量、土壤含水量和冠层覆盖率的准确度均可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信