Pathology and forensic science: Dignity, respect, and the dead body

Imogen Jones
{"title":"Pathology and forensic science: Dignity, respect, and the dead body","authors":"Imogen Jones","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.1512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This perspective considers the forensic examination of deceased bodies via the medico‐legal autopsy. It is argued that the decisions we make about what we do with, and to, deceased bodies and body parts is, and should be, limited by the need to treat bodies with dignity and respect. The treatment of parts of bodies has been explored in bioethics, substantially due to organ retention scandals bringing this to the public and political attention. But these cases—although important—represent extremes. This perspective therefore focuses on routine death investigations and the extent to which scientific method should be limited because of the competing interests in the deceased body and its treatment. It is argued that how we treat bodies/body parts matters because they represent once‐living people with contexts, histories, and relationships. They had, and perhaps still have, value as human persons. As humans, we share complex relationships and have different views and interpretations of what our duties are to each other. Dignity and respect aid by providing baseline standards, and are reflected as such in professional codes and regulations. However, the system is imbued with sufficient discretion that it is impossible to achieve consistency of standards or practice. This means that the treatment of deceased bodies in forensic science will differ substantially depending on both context and the practitioners involved.This article is categorized under: Forensic Medicine > Medicolegal Death Investigation Systems","PeriodicalId":506835,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Forensic Science","volume":"234 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Forensic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This perspective considers the forensic examination of deceased bodies via the medico‐legal autopsy. It is argued that the decisions we make about what we do with, and to, deceased bodies and body parts is, and should be, limited by the need to treat bodies with dignity and respect. The treatment of parts of bodies has been explored in bioethics, substantially due to organ retention scandals bringing this to the public and political attention. But these cases—although important—represent extremes. This perspective therefore focuses on routine death investigations and the extent to which scientific method should be limited because of the competing interests in the deceased body and its treatment. It is argued that how we treat bodies/body parts matters because they represent once‐living people with contexts, histories, and relationships. They had, and perhaps still have, value as human persons. As humans, we share complex relationships and have different views and interpretations of what our duties are to each other. Dignity and respect aid by providing baseline standards, and are reflected as such in professional codes and regulations. However, the system is imbued with sufficient discretion that it is impossible to achieve consistency of standards or practice. This means that the treatment of deceased bodies in forensic science will differ substantially depending on both context and the practitioners involved.This article is categorized under: Forensic Medicine > Medicolegal Death Investigation Systems
病理学和法医学:尊严、尊重和尸体
本视角探讨了通过医学-法律尸检对死者尸体进行法医检查的问题。本文认为,我们在决定如何处理和对待已故遗体和遗体器官时,必须而且应当以尊重遗体的尊严为前提。生物伦理学一直在探讨如何处理尸体的器官,这主要是由于保留器官的丑闻引起了公众和政界的关注。但是,这些案例虽然重要,却代表了极端。因此,本视角侧重于常规死亡调查,以及由于死者尸体及其处理过程中存在利益冲突,科学方法应在多大程度上受到限制。有人认为,我们如何对待尸体/身体器官很重要,因为它们代表着曾经活过的人,有着背景、历史和关系。它们曾经具有,或许现在仍然具有作为人的价值。作为人类,我们有着复杂的关系,对彼此的责任有着不同的看法和解释。尊严和尊重提供了基本标准,并反映在专业准则和条例中。然而,该系统被赋予了足够的自由裁量权,因此不可能实现标准或做法的一致性。这意味着,法医学对死者遗体的处理方式会因环境和相关从业人员的不同而大相径庭:法医学 > 法医死亡调查系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信