Pluralising critical technical practice

Daniela van Geenen, Karin van Es, Jonathan WY Gray
{"title":"Pluralising critical technical practice","authors":"Daniela van Geenen, Karin van Es, Jonathan WY Gray","doi":"10.1177/13548565231192105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this special issue, we turn to ideas of and approaches to critical technical practices (CTPs) as entry points to doing critique and doing things critically in digitally mediated cultures and societies. We explore the pluralisation of ‘critical technical practice’, starting from its early formulations in the context of AI research and development (Agre, 1997a, 1997b) to the many ways in which it has resonated and been taken up by different publications, projects, groups, and communities of practice, and what is has come to mean. Agre defined CTP as a situational, practical, and constructive way of working: ‘a technical practice for which critical reflection upon the practice is part of the practice itself’ (1997a: XII). Communities of practice in which the notion has been adopted, adapted, and put to use range from human–computer interaction (HCI) to media art and pedagogy, from science and technology studies (STS) and computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) to digital humanities, media studies and data studies. This special issue affirms the pluralisation of CTP, and serves as an invitation to (re)consider what it means to use this notion drawing on a wider body of work, including beyond Agre. In this introduction, we review and discuss CTPs according to (1) Agre, (2) indexed research, and (3) contributors to this special issue. We conclude with some questions and considerations for those interested in working with this notion.","PeriodicalId":505001,"journal":{"name":"Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies","volume":"64 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231192105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this special issue, we turn to ideas of and approaches to critical technical practices (CTPs) as entry points to doing critique and doing things critically in digitally mediated cultures and societies. We explore the pluralisation of ‘critical technical practice’, starting from its early formulations in the context of AI research and development (Agre, 1997a, 1997b) to the many ways in which it has resonated and been taken up by different publications, projects, groups, and communities of practice, and what is has come to mean. Agre defined CTP as a situational, practical, and constructive way of working: ‘a technical practice for which critical reflection upon the practice is part of the practice itself’ (1997a: XII). Communities of practice in which the notion has been adopted, adapted, and put to use range from human–computer interaction (HCI) to media art and pedagogy, from science and technology studies (STS) and computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) to digital humanities, media studies and data studies. This special issue affirms the pluralisation of CTP, and serves as an invitation to (re)consider what it means to use this notion drawing on a wider body of work, including beyond Agre. In this introduction, we review and discuss CTPs according to (1) Agre, (2) indexed research, and (3) contributors to this special issue. We conclude with some questions and considerations for those interested in working with this notion.
批判性技术实践的多元化
在本特刊中,我们将探讨批判性技术实践(CTPs)的理念和方法,以此作为在以数字为媒介的文化和社会中进行批判和批判性做事的切入点。我们探讨了 "批判性技术实践 "的多元化,从其在人工智能研究与开发背景下的早期表述(Agre, 1997a,1997b),到它在不同出版物、项目、团体和实践社区中产生共鸣和被采用的多种方式,以及它的含义。Agre 将 CTP 定义为一种情境性、实践性和建设性的工作方式:"一种技术实践,对实践的批判性反思是实践本身的一部分"(1997a: XII)。从人机交互(HCI)到媒体艺术和教育学,从科学技术研究(STS)和计算机支持的协同工作(CSCW)到数字人文、媒体研究和数据研究,各种实践社区都采用、调整和使用了这一概念。本特刊肯定了 CTP 的多元化,并邀请大家(重新)考虑在更广泛的工作中使用这一概念的意义,包括 Agre 以外的工作。在本引言中,我们将根据 (1) 阿格雷、(2) 索引研究和 (3) 本特刊的撰稿人来回顾和讨论 CTP。最后,我们将提出一些问题,并为有意使用这一概念的人提供一些参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信