Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: Posterior versus anterior approach in paediatrics undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

D. A. El Malla, M. E. El Mourad
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: Posterior versus anterior approach in paediatrics undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair","authors":"D. A. El Malla, M. E. El Mourad","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_366_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regional anaesthesia has gained popularity in managing post-operative pain in paediatric patients. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is recognised as one of the peri-operative pain management techniques used during abdominal surgeries. However, no consensus about the best approach has been reached. Sixty paediatric patients with ages ranging from 1 to 6 as well as classification I and II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia, were allocated to receive either a posterior approach (Group I) or an anterior approach (Group II) QLB. Twenty four-hour morphine consumption, the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) score, duration of analgesia, performance time, and block-related complications were recorded. Group II showed significantly lower morphine consumption as well as a longer duration of analgesia (P = 0.039*, 0.020*, respectively), with an equivalent period for block performance being reported in the two groups (P = 0.080). At 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours post-operatively, the FLACC scores were substantially diminished in Group II compared to Group I (P = 0.001*, 0.012*, 0.002*, 0.028*, respectively). However, at twenty-four hours, comparable pain scores were observed between both groups (P = 0.626). In addition, there were no block-related complications. In paediatric patients scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, the ultra-sound-guided anterior approach of the QLB was associated with significantly reduced post-operative morphine consumption, a lower FLACC score, and a longer analgesia duration when compared to the posterior approach.","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"278 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_366_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional anaesthesia has gained popularity in managing post-operative pain in paediatric patients. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is recognised as one of the peri-operative pain management techniques used during abdominal surgeries. However, no consensus about the best approach has been reached. Sixty paediatric patients with ages ranging from 1 to 6 as well as classification I and II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia, were allocated to receive either a posterior approach (Group I) or an anterior approach (Group II) QLB. Twenty four-hour morphine consumption, the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) score, duration of analgesia, performance time, and block-related complications were recorded. Group II showed significantly lower morphine consumption as well as a longer duration of analgesia (P = 0.039*, 0.020*, respectively), with an equivalent period for block performance being reported in the two groups (P = 0.080). At 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours post-operatively, the FLACC scores were substantially diminished in Group II compared to Group I (P = 0.001*, 0.012*, 0.002*, 0.028*, respectively). However, at twenty-four hours, comparable pain scores were observed between both groups (P = 0.626). In addition, there were no block-related complications. In paediatric patients scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, the ultra-sound-guided anterior approach of the QLB was associated with significantly reduced post-operative morphine consumption, a lower FLACC score, and a longer analgesia duration when compared to the posterior approach.
超声引导下的腰方肌阻滞:儿科腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的后路与前路
区域麻醉在治疗儿科患者术后疼痛方面越来越受欢迎。腰椎四头肌阻滞(QLB)是腹部手术中公认的围手术期疼痛控制技术之一。然而,人们尚未就最佳方法达成共识。 60 名年龄在 1 到 6 岁之间、符合美国麻醉医师协会 I 级和 II 级标准、计划接受腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术的儿童患者被分配接受后路(I 组)或前路(II 组)QLB。记录了 24 小时的吗啡消耗量、面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和可安慰性(FLACC)评分、镇痛持续时间、执行时间和阻滞相关并发症。 第二组的吗啡消耗量明显较低,镇痛持续时间也较长(P = 0.039*,0.020*),两组的阻滞时间相当(P = 0.080)。与第一组相比,第二组在术后 2、4、6 和 12 小时的 FLACC 评分大幅下降(P = 0.001*、0.012*、0.002*、0.028*)。但在 24 小时后,两组的疼痛评分相当(P = 0.626)。此外,两组患者均未出现与包块相关的并发症。 在计划进行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的儿科患者中,与后入路相比,超音波引导的 QLB 前入路可显著减少术后吗啡用量,降低 FLACC 评分,延长镇痛时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信