Differentiated approach in providing care to patients with fresh bile duct injuries

R. Avanesyan, M. Korolev, L. Fedotov, M. E. Gorovoy
{"title":"Differentiated approach in providing care to patients with fresh bile duct injuries","authors":"R. Avanesyan, M. Korolev, L. Fedotov, M. E. Gorovoy","doi":"10.16931//1995-5464.2023-4-32-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To demonstrate the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery for bile duct injuries.Materials and methods. The results of combined minimally invasive treatment of 52 patients with fresh bile duct injuries from 2006 to 2023 were analyzed. Bile duct injuries diagnosed within 1–10 days after the operation were referred to as “fresh”. Intraoperative detection of bile duct injury was the criterion of exclusion from the analysis. In 80.8% of observations, combined minimally invasive interventions were performed in the form of percutaneous operations under ultrasound and radiography control. In 19.2% of observations, antegrade percutaneous and retrograde endoscopic access was used.Results. The algorithm for conducting minimally invasive procedures for bile duct injuries and strictures should be selected depending on the terms of injury and the character of injury and complications. In the majority of fresh bile duct injuries, a two-stage algorithm of duct patency restoration was applied. This prevented additional complications and allowed the patient to be prepared for stent biliary drainage after analyzing the primary data of fistula cholangiography. In all observations, minimally invasive procedures of bile duct patency restoration were completed with stent biliary drainage. Complications were noted in eight patients (15.4%).Conclusion. In fresh bile duct injuries, combined minimally invasive methods are an effective alternative to conventional reconstructive surgeries.","PeriodicalId":505469,"journal":{"name":"Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16931//1995-5464.2023-4-32-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To demonstrate the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery for bile duct injuries.Materials and methods. The results of combined minimally invasive treatment of 52 patients with fresh bile duct injuries from 2006 to 2023 were analyzed. Bile duct injuries diagnosed within 1–10 days after the operation were referred to as “fresh”. Intraoperative detection of bile duct injury was the criterion of exclusion from the analysis. In 80.8% of observations, combined minimally invasive interventions were performed in the form of percutaneous operations under ultrasound and radiography control. In 19.2% of observations, antegrade percutaneous and retrograde endoscopic access was used.Results. The algorithm for conducting minimally invasive procedures for bile duct injuries and strictures should be selected depending on the terms of injury and the character of injury and complications. In the majority of fresh bile duct injuries, a two-stage algorithm of duct patency restoration was applied. This prevented additional complications and allowed the patient to be prepared for stent biliary drainage after analyzing the primary data of fistula cholangiography. In all observations, minimally invasive procedures of bile duct patency restoration were completed with stent biliary drainage. Complications were noted in eight patients (15.4%).Conclusion. In fresh bile duct injuries, combined minimally invasive methods are an effective alternative to conventional reconstructive surgeries.
为新鲜胆管损伤患者提供不同的护理方法
目的证明微创手术治疗胆管损伤的疗效。对 2006 年至 2023 年间 52 例新鲜胆管损伤患者的联合微创治疗结果进行分析。术后1-10天内确诊的胆管损伤被称为 "新鲜 "胆管损伤。术中发现胆管损伤是排除在分析之外的标准。在80.8%的观察病例中,在超声波和X光检查的控制下,以经皮手术的形式进行了联合微创介入治疗。在19.2%的观察中,使用了经皮前行和内镜逆行入路。胆管损伤和狭窄微创手术的算法应根据损伤条件、损伤特点和并发症来选择。在大多数新鲜胆管损伤中,采用了两阶段胆管通畅恢复算法。这样可以防止出现更多并发症,并在分析瘘管胆管造影的主要数据后为支架胆道引流做好准备。在所有观察中,胆管通畅恢复的微创手术均在支架胆道引流术后完成。8名患者(15.4%)出现并发症。对于新鲜胆管损伤,联合微创方法是传统重建手术的有效替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信