Empirical Verification of Different Rank Dynamic Roles in Informal Hierarchies

Peter Vatter, Andreas Weisbeck
{"title":"Empirical Verification of Different Rank Dynamic Roles in Informal Hierarchies","authors":"Peter Vatter, Andreas Weisbeck","doi":"10.18690/um.fov.6.2023.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations today face a more volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous market environment, referred to by the term »VUCA world«. To this, they commonly respond with management approaches that comprise flat hierarchies and a decentrali¬za¬tion of decision-making structures. But while some companies are very successful with such approaches, others struggle significantly. One reason is that conflicts about ranks in the informal hierarchy arise as the formal hierarchy diminishes. Hence, understanding group dynamics and the different strategies of team members in the social competition becomes increasingly important. In previous works, a theoretical model containing five different roles was presented. These roles result from specific psychological capabilities, values, and needs of each individual and include specific contributions to the social functioning of the group. In this paper, participants of an online survey have been asked about their contribution to team success. A subsequent factor analysis of n = 421 datasets proofed the existence of five different roles and, thus, the validity of the model.","PeriodicalId":504907,"journal":{"name":"36th Bled eConference – Digital Economy and Society: The Balancing Act for Digital Innovation in Times of Instability: June 25 – 28, 2023, Bled, Slovenia, Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"36th Bled eConference – Digital Economy and Society: The Balancing Act for Digital Innovation in Times of Instability: June 25 – 28, 2023, Bled, Slovenia, Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.6.2023.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations today face a more volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous market environment, referred to by the term »VUCA world«. To this, they commonly respond with management approaches that comprise flat hierarchies and a decentrali¬za¬tion of decision-making structures. But while some companies are very successful with such approaches, others struggle significantly. One reason is that conflicts about ranks in the informal hierarchy arise as the formal hierarchy diminishes. Hence, understanding group dynamics and the different strategies of team members in the social competition becomes increasingly important. In previous works, a theoretical model containing five different roles was presented. These roles result from specific psychological capabilities, values, and needs of each individual and include specific contributions to the social functioning of the group. In this paper, participants of an online survey have been asked about their contribution to team success. A subsequent factor analysis of n = 421 datasets proofed the existence of five different roles and, thus, the validity of the model.
非正式等级体系中不同等级动态角色的经验验证
当今的组织面临着更加动荡、不确定、复杂和模糊的市场环境,即 "VUCA 世界"。为此,企业通常采用扁平化等级制度和分散决策结构的管理方法。但是,有些公司在采用这种方法时非常成功,而有些公司则举步维艰。其中一个原因是,随着正式等级制度的减少,非正式等级制度中的等级冲突也随之产生。因此,了解群体动态和团队成员在社会竞争中的不同策略变得越来越重要。在以前的著作中,提出了一个包含五种不同角色的理论模型。这些角色源于每个人的特定心理能力、价值观和需求,包括对群体社会功能的特定贡献。在本文中,一项在线调查的参与者被问及他们对团队成功的贡献。随后对 n = 421 个数据集进行的因子分析证明了五种不同角色的存在,从而证明了模型的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信