Knowledge management and intellectual capital according to sociodemographic variables in university professors

Rafael Romero-Carazas, Oscar David La Cruz-Arango, Julio Alberto Torres-Sánchez, Victoria Torres Cheje de Manchego, Jorge Luis Suclla-Revilla, Sonia Gladys Gutiérrez-Monzón, Mario Bryan Araujo-Montaño, Melina Elizabeth Chávez-Choque, Fabrizio Del Carpio-Delgado, David Hugo Bernedo-Moreira
{"title":"Knowledge management and intellectual capital according to sociodemographic variables in university professors","authors":"Rafael Romero-Carazas, Oscar David La Cruz-Arango, Julio Alberto Torres-Sánchez, Victoria Torres Cheje de Manchego, Jorge Luis Suclla-Revilla, Sonia Gladys Gutiérrez-Monzón, Mario Bryan Araujo-Montaño, Melina Elizabeth Chávez-Choque, Fabrizio Del Carpio-Delgado, David Hugo Bernedo-Moreira","doi":"10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e96253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective was to determine the differences in knowledge management and intellectual capital according to age, sex and length of service in teachers of the Universidad Peruana Unión 2022. Method: The research methodology had a quantitative approach, correlational explanatory type, non-experimental design and cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 192 teachers from the faculty of business sciences, to whom a survey was applied. Results: The results show significant differences in knowledge management and intellectual capital according to age, sex and time. Conclusions: There are no significant differences that imply a change in knowledge management with respect to sociodemographic data (sex, age and years of work). With respect to intellectual capital, no statistically significant differences were found in relation to the sociodemographic factors (sex, age). There are significant differences with respect to the sociodemographic factor years in the organization.","PeriodicalId":505727,"journal":{"name":"Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação","volume":"398 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e96253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to determine the differences in knowledge management and intellectual capital according to age, sex and length of service in teachers of the Universidad Peruana Unión 2022. Method: The research methodology had a quantitative approach, correlational explanatory type, non-experimental design and cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 192 teachers from the faculty of business sciences, to whom a survey was applied. Results: The results show significant differences in knowledge management and intellectual capital according to age, sex and time. Conclusions: There are no significant differences that imply a change in knowledge management with respect to sociodemographic data (sex, age and years of work). With respect to intellectual capital, no statistically significant differences were found in relation to the sociodemographic factors (sex, age). There are significant differences with respect to the sociodemographic factor years in the organization.
根据大学教授的社会人口变量确定知识管理和智力资本
目的目的是确定秘鲁 2022 大学教师在知识管理和智力资本方面因年龄、性别和工龄而存在的差异。研究方法研究方法采用定量方法、相关解释类型、非实验设计和横截面。样本包括商业科学学院的 192 名教师,对他们进行了调查。结果显示结果显示,不同年龄、性别和时间的教师在知识管理和智力资本方面存在明显差异。结论:在社会人口数据(性别、年龄和工作年限)方面,没有明显的差异表明知识管理发生了变化。在知识资本方面,与社会人口因素(性别、年龄)有关的差异在统计学上没有显 著性。与社会人口因素(在组织中的工作年限)有关的差异则很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信