Kedudukan Hukum Tenaga Medis dan Tenaga Kesehatan Perawat Sebagai Pemangku Profesi Kesehatan Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan

Hotma P. Sibuea, D. Wijanarko, Ali Johardi Wirogioto, Erwin Syahruddin, Katrina Siagian
{"title":"Kedudukan Hukum Tenaga Medis dan Tenaga Kesehatan Perawat Sebagai Pemangku Profesi Kesehatan Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan","authors":"Hotma P. Sibuea, D. Wijanarko, Ali Johardi Wirogioto, Erwin Syahruddin, Katrina Siagian","doi":"10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health professions recognized autonomously by law consist of (1) the medical profession, (2) nursing, and (3) midwifery. These three health professions have different legal principles, so both types of professions have professional autonomy. The professional autonomy of health professions has consequences for various aspects of the existence of health profession stakeholders, such as their position, function, tasks, authority, and legal responsibilities. One of the legal aspects of health profession stakeholders is the legal standing of each health profession stakeholder. The law does not regulate the legal standing of health profession stakeholders in healthcare services, resulting in a legal vacuum regarding the legal standing of these health profession stakeholders. Do health profession stakeholders have equal or different legal standing in healthcare services from the perspective of the principle of legal equality? The research method used is the juridical-normative research method, which examines primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research conclusion is that the legal standing of health profession stakeholders is the same and equal from the perspective of the principle of legal equality. The suggestion presented is that legislators need to amend healthcare laws, medical practice laws, nursing laws, and midwifery laws to regulate and establish the legal standing of health profession stakeholders as the same and equal based on the principle of legal equality.","PeriodicalId":508279,"journal":{"name":"KRTHA BHAYANGKARA","volume":"757 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KRTHA BHAYANGKARA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health professions recognized autonomously by law consist of (1) the medical profession, (2) nursing, and (3) midwifery. These three health professions have different legal principles, so both types of professions have professional autonomy. The professional autonomy of health professions has consequences for various aspects of the existence of health profession stakeholders, such as their position, function, tasks, authority, and legal responsibilities. One of the legal aspects of health profession stakeholders is the legal standing of each health profession stakeholder. The law does not regulate the legal standing of health profession stakeholders in healthcare services, resulting in a legal vacuum regarding the legal standing of these health profession stakeholders. Do health profession stakeholders have equal or different legal standing in healthcare services from the perspective of the principle of legal equality? The research method used is the juridical-normative research method, which examines primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research conclusion is that the legal standing of health profession stakeholders is the same and equal from the perspective of the principle of legal equality. The suggestion presented is that legislators need to amend healthcare laws, medical practice laws, nursing laws, and midwifery laws to regulate and establish the legal standing of health profession stakeholders as the same and equal based on the principle of legal equality.
医务人员和护士作为保健专业人员在保健服务中的法律地位
法律认可的自主保健专业包括:(1) 医疗专业、(2) 护理专业和 (3) 助产专业。这三种卫生专业的法律原则不同,因此两类专业都有专业自主权。卫生专业的专业自主性对卫生专业利益相关者存在的各个方面都有影响,如他们的地位、职能、任务、权力和法律责任等。卫生专业利益相关者的法律方面之一是每个卫生专业利益相关者的法律地位。法律没有对医疗保健服务中卫生专业利益相关者的法律地位做出规定,导致这些卫生专业利益相关者的法律地位处于法律真空状态。从法律平等原则的角度来看,医疗卫生服务中的医疗卫生专业利益相关者的法律地位是平等的还是不同的?本研究采用的研究方法是法学-规范研究法,即对第一手、第二手和第三手法律资料进行研究。研究结论是:从法律平等原则的角度看,医疗卫生行业利益相关者的法律地位是相同和平等的。提出的建议是,立法者需要修订医疗保健法、医疗执业法、护理法和助产法,以法律平等原则为基础,规范和确立卫生行业利益相关者的法律地位是相同和平等的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信