Effect of in-canopy foliar fungicide applications in corn on spray coverage

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY
Nolan R. Anderson, Kiersten A. Wise
{"title":"Effect of in-canopy foliar fungicide applications in corn on spray coverage","authors":"Nolan R. Anderson,&nbsp;Kiersten A. Wise","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Foliar fungicides are available to suppress Diplodia ear rot (DER), caused by <i>Stenocarpella maydis</i> (Berk.) Sutton and <i>Stenocarpella macrospora</i> (Earle) Sutton) in corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), but previous research has indicated these fungicides have limited efficacy against the disease using traditional over-canopy application methods. In an effort to improve coverage within the canopy and potentially improve disease control of DER, experiments were conducted in 2020, 2021, and 2022 to examine the effect of ground-driven, in-canopy fungicide nozzle technology on DER severity and spray coverage on the ear leaf and ear of corn plants. Application methods included over-canopy nozzles, over-canopy + drop nozzles, and over-canopy + 360 Undercover nozzles. Within each application method, treatments consisted of a non-inoculated control, or were inoculated with a conidial suspension of <i>S. maydis</i>. The fungicides benzovindiflupyr + azoxystrobin + propiconazole and pydiflumetofen + azoxystrobin + propiconazole were applied within each application method to measure efficacy against DER. In all years, neither fungicide product nor application method reduced DER severity. No fungicide applications increased yield compared to the non-treated control. The addition of drop nozzles or 360 Undercover nozzles to traditional over-canopy nozzles increased spray coverage on the ear (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001) compared to over-canopy nozzles alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foliar fungicides are available to suppress Diplodia ear rot (DER), caused by Stenocarpella maydis (Berk.) Sutton and Stenocarpella macrospora (Earle) Sutton) in corn (Zea mays L.), but previous research has indicated these fungicides have limited efficacy against the disease using traditional over-canopy application methods. In an effort to improve coverage within the canopy and potentially improve disease control of DER, experiments were conducted in 2020, 2021, and 2022 to examine the effect of ground-driven, in-canopy fungicide nozzle technology on DER severity and spray coverage on the ear leaf and ear of corn plants. Application methods included over-canopy nozzles, over-canopy + drop nozzles, and over-canopy + 360 Undercover nozzles. Within each application method, treatments consisted of a non-inoculated control, or were inoculated with a conidial suspension of S. maydis. The fungicides benzovindiflupyr + azoxystrobin + propiconazole and pydiflumetofen + azoxystrobin + propiconazole were applied within each application method to measure efficacy against DER. In all years, neither fungicide product nor application method reduced DER severity. No fungicide applications increased yield compared to the non-treated control. The addition of drop nozzles or 360 Undercover nozzles to traditional over-canopy nozzles increased spray coverage on the ear (P < 0.0001) compared to over-canopy nozzles alone.

在玉米冠层内施用叶面杀菌剂对喷洒覆盖率的影响
叶面杀菌剂可用于抑制玉米中由 Stenocarpella maydis (Berk.) Sutton 和 Stenocarpella macrospora (Earle) Sutton 引起的 Diplodia 穗腐病 (DER),但先前的研究表明,使用传统的树冠上施药方法,这些杀菌剂对该病的防效有限。为了提高冠层内的覆盖率并改善对 DER 病害的潜在控制,2020 年、2021 年和 2022 年进行了实验,以研究地面驱动的冠层内杀菌剂喷嘴技术对 DER 的严重程度以及对玉米植株穗叶和穗轴的喷洒覆盖率的影响。施药方法包括树冠上喷头、树冠上 + 滴灌喷头和树冠上 + 360 Undercover 喷头。在每种施药方法中,处理包括不接种对照,或接种 S. maydis 分生孢子悬浮液。每种施药方法都使用了杀菌剂苯醚甲环唑+唑菌胺+丙环唑和吡唑醚菌酯+唑菌胺+丙环唑,以测定对 DER 的药效。在所有年份中,杀菌剂产品和施用方法都没有降低 DER 的严重程度。与未施用杀菌剂的对照组相比,施用杀菌剂均未提高产量。与传统的树冠上喷头相比,在传统树冠上喷头的基础上增加滴注喷头或 360 Undercover 喷头可增加果穗上的喷洒覆盖率(P < 0.0001)。本文受版权保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信