More than data repositories: perceived information needs for the development of social sciences and humanities research infrastructures

Anna Sendra, E. Late, Sanna Kumpulainen
{"title":"More than data repositories: perceived information needs for the development of social sciences and humanities research infrastructures","authors":"Anna Sendra, E. Late, Sanna Kumpulainen","doi":"10.47989/ir284598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The digitalization of social sciences and humanities research necessitates research infrastructures. However, this transformation is still incipient, highlighting the need to better understand how to successfully support data-intensive research. Method. Starting from a case study of building a national infrastructure for conducting data-intensive research, this study aims to understand the information needs of digital researchers regarding the facility and explore the importance of evaluation in its development. Analysis. Thirteen semi-structured interviews with social sciences and humanities scholars and computer and data scientists processed through a thematic analysis revealed three themes (developing a research infrastructure, needs and expectations of the research infrastructure, and an approach to user feedback and user interactions). Results. Findings reveal that developing an infrastructure for conducting data-intensive research is a complicated task influenced by contrasting information needs between social sciences and humanities scholars and computer and data scientists, such as the demand for increased support of the former. Findings also highlight the limited role of evaluation in its creation. Conclusions. The development of infrastructures for conducting data-intensive research requires further discussion that particularly considers the disciplinary differences between social sciences and humanities scholars and computer and data scientists. Suggestions on how to better design this kind of facilities are also raised.","PeriodicalId":509289,"journal":{"name":"Information Research an international electronic journal","volume":"212 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Research an international electronic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The digitalization of social sciences and humanities research necessitates research infrastructures. However, this transformation is still incipient, highlighting the need to better understand how to successfully support data-intensive research. Method. Starting from a case study of building a national infrastructure for conducting data-intensive research, this study aims to understand the information needs of digital researchers regarding the facility and explore the importance of evaluation in its development. Analysis. Thirteen semi-structured interviews with social sciences and humanities scholars and computer and data scientists processed through a thematic analysis revealed three themes (developing a research infrastructure, needs and expectations of the research infrastructure, and an approach to user feedback and user interactions). Results. Findings reveal that developing an infrastructure for conducting data-intensive research is a complicated task influenced by contrasting information needs between social sciences and humanities scholars and computer and data scientists, such as the demand for increased support of the former. Findings also highlight the limited role of evaluation in its creation. Conclusions. The development of infrastructures for conducting data-intensive research requires further discussion that particularly considers the disciplinary differences between social sciences and humanities scholars and computer and data scientists. Suggestions on how to better design this kind of facilities are also raised.
不仅仅是数据储存库:发展社会科学及人文科学研究基础设施的预期信息需求
导言。社会科学和人文科学研究的数字化需要研究基础设施。然而,这种转变仍处于起步阶段,因此需要更好地了解如何成功支持数据密集型研究。方法。本研究以建设国家数据密集型研究基础设施的案例研究为起点,旨在了解数字化研究人员对该设施的信息需求,并探讨评估在其发展过程中的重要性。分析。对社会科学和人文学科学者以及计算机和数据科学家进行了 13 次半结构式访谈,通过主题分析,发现了三个主题(开发研究基础设施、对研究基础设施的需求和期望,以及用户反馈和用户互动方法)。结果。研究结果表明,开发用于开展数据密集型研究的基础设施是一项复杂的任务,社会科学和人文学者与计算机和数据科学家对信息的需求存在差异,例如前者要求获得更多支持。研究结果还凸显了评估在创建过程中的有限作用。结论。开展数据密集型研究的基础设施建设需要进一步讨论,尤其要考虑到社会科学和人文学者与计算机和数据科学家之间的学科差异。此外,还就如何更好地设计此类设施提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信