Response of Kenya Security Forces to Terrorist Attacks in the Post-Westgate Period.

David Jirásek
{"title":"Response of Kenya Security Forces to Terrorist Attacks in the Post-Westgate Period.","authors":"David Jirásek","doi":"10.3849/1802-7199.23.2023.02.003-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes how Kenya, through its security forces, responded to significant terrorist attacks carried out by terrorist organization Al-Shabaab on the territory of Kenya alongside how those attacks contributed to the development of counter-terrorism measures. The measures are analyzed from a legislative, technical and security point of view. The article is based on a conceptual analysis of P.C. Sederberg, combined with the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and argues that three significant terrorist attacks on Westgate in 2013, Garissa in 2015 and Dusit D2 in 2019 were key factors of the development and adoption of complex counter-terrorism measures. Those measures were based on the adoption of appropriate laws, development of the institutional structure and implementation of military and police counter-terrorism measures. However, changes were gradual, reactive instead of proactive. The country has learned to build the state’s capacity to combat terrorism but struggled with conflict prevention and respect for the rule of law. It succeeded with a build-up of counter-terrorism security forces able to respond effectively and on time. But, finding and eliminating the causes of the conflict, they were far behind. All three significant terrorist attacks showed the need for an appropriate combination of counter-terrorism measures. They cannot be put in use separately, otherwise, it can lead to unintended results.","PeriodicalId":509900,"journal":{"name":"Obrana a strategie (Defence and Strategy)","volume":"210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrana a strategie (Defence and Strategy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.23.2023.02.003-021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article describes how Kenya, through its security forces, responded to significant terrorist attacks carried out by terrorist organization Al-Shabaab on the territory of Kenya alongside how those attacks contributed to the development of counter-terrorism measures. The measures are analyzed from a legislative, technical and security point of view. The article is based on a conceptual analysis of P.C. Sederberg, combined with the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and argues that three significant terrorist attacks on Westgate in 2013, Garissa in 2015 and Dusit D2 in 2019 were key factors of the development and adoption of complex counter-terrorism measures. Those measures were based on the adoption of appropriate laws, development of the institutional structure and implementation of military and police counter-terrorism measures. However, changes were gradual, reactive instead of proactive. The country has learned to build the state’s capacity to combat terrorism but struggled with conflict prevention and respect for the rule of law. It succeeded with a build-up of counter-terrorism security forces able to respond effectively and on time. But, finding and eliminating the causes of the conflict, they were far behind. All three significant terrorist attacks showed the need for an appropriate combination of counter-terrorism measures. They cannot be put in use separately, otherwise, it can lead to unintended results.
后西门时期肯尼亚安全部队对恐怖袭击的反应。
文章介绍了肯尼亚如何通过其安全部队应对恐怖组织青年党在肯尼亚境内发动的重大恐怖袭击,以及这些袭击如何促进了反恐措施的制定。文章从立法、技术和安全角度对这些措施进行了分析。文章以 P.C. Sederberg 的概念分析为基础,结合《联合国全球反恐战略》,认为 2013 年的 Westgate、2015 年的 Garissa 和 2019 年的 Dusit D2 三次重大恐怖袭击是制定和采取复杂反恐措施的关键因素。这些措施的基础是通过适当的法律、发展体制结构以及实施军事和警察反恐措施。然而,变化是渐进的,是被动的,而不是主动的。该国学会了建设国家反恐能力,但在预防冲突和尊重法治方面却举步维艰。它成功地建立了一支能够及时有效应对的反恐安全部队。但是,在寻找和消除冲突根源方面,他们却远远落在后面。所有三起重大恐怖袭击事件都表明,有必要将各种反恐措施适当结合起来。这些措施不能单独使用,否则会导致意想不到的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信