Retrofitting of Box Section Concrete Beams to Resist Shear and Torsion Using Near-Surface-Mount (NSM) GFRP Stirrups

Ahmed Mahmoud, Moaz Nasser, Tarek Mostafa, Ahmed Khater
{"title":"Retrofitting of Box Section Concrete Beams to Resist Shear and Torsion Using Near-Surface-Mount (NSM) GFRP Stirrups","authors":"Ahmed Mahmoud, Moaz Nasser, Tarek Mostafa, Ahmed Khater","doi":"10.3221/igf-esis.67.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a few kinds of research about box section Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams under the effect of combined shear and torsional stresses. In the present research, the concept of adding external strengthening, in the transverse direction, is adopted. The paper focuses on using Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer GFRP ropes as near-surface mount stirrups. Nine box-section concrete specimens were decanted and tested. Three variables are adopted, (1) GFRP stirrups diameter, (2) GFRP stirrups inclination, and (3) GFRP stirrups spacing. The experimental results showed considerable enhancement in the shear capacity of the strengthened beams by 8 to 56% depending on the effectiveness of the studied parameters. Ductility and toughness were improved when more intensive strengthening schemes were adopted. The shear capacity of all tested beams based on Egyptian code ECP 208–2019 is calculated and compared with that from American code ACI 440–2019 and Canadian code CSA-A23.3-04. The shear capacity from both Egyptian and American codes compared with experimental loads. The analytical results are conservative in some cases and unconservative in others while the analytical results in general are conservative. The Canadian code CSA-A23.3-04 is unconservative compared to the experimental results for the range of the studied parameters and specimens.","PeriodicalId":507970,"journal":{"name":"Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale","volume":"642 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3221/igf-esis.67.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are a few kinds of research about box section Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams under the effect of combined shear and torsional stresses. In the present research, the concept of adding external strengthening, in the transverse direction, is adopted. The paper focuses on using Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer GFRP ropes as near-surface mount stirrups. Nine box-section concrete specimens were decanted and tested. Three variables are adopted, (1) GFRP stirrups diameter, (2) GFRP stirrups inclination, and (3) GFRP stirrups spacing. The experimental results showed considerable enhancement in the shear capacity of the strengthened beams by 8 to 56% depending on the effectiveness of the studied parameters. Ductility and toughness were improved when more intensive strengthening schemes were adopted. The shear capacity of all tested beams based on Egyptian code ECP 208–2019 is calculated and compared with that from American code ACI 440–2019 and Canadian code CSA-A23.3-04. The shear capacity from both Egyptian and American codes compared with experimental loads. The analytical results are conservative in some cases and unconservative in others while the analytical results in general are conservative. The Canadian code CSA-A23.3-04 is unconservative compared to the experimental results for the range of the studied parameters and specimens.
使用近表面安装 (NSM) GFRP 箍筋改造箱形截面混凝土梁以抵抗剪力和扭力
关于箱形截面钢筋混凝土 (RC) 梁在剪切和扭转联合应力作用下的研究为数不多。本研究采用了在横向增加外部加固的概念。本文的重点是使用玻璃纤维增强聚合物 GFRP 绳作为近表面安装箍筋。对九个箱形截面混凝土试样进行了倾析和测试。采用了三个变量:(1) GFRP 箍筋直径;(2) GFRP 箍筋倾斜度;(3) GFRP 箍筋间距。实验结果表明,根据所研究参数的有效性,加固梁的抗剪能力提高了 8% 至 56%。当采用更密集的加固方案时,延展性和韧性都得到了改善。根据埃及 ECP 208-2019 规范计算了所有测试梁的抗剪能力,并与美国 ACI 440-2019 规范和加拿大 CSA-A23.3-04 规范进行了比较。埃及和美国规范的抗剪能力与实验荷载进行了比较。分析结果在某些情况下是保守的,在其他情况下是不保守的,而分析结果总体上是保守的。与实验结果相比,加拿大 CSA-A23.3-04 规范在所研究的参数和试样范围内是不保守的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信