{"title":"English English","authors":"Michele Coletti, Pascal Bovy, A. Vernay","doi":"10.4468/2023.2.04bovi.coletti.vernay","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social innovation (SI) aims at improving people’s life when technological or business innovations are not sufficient. However, the classic Triple Helix (TH) theory does not explicitly deal with SI, and relegates civil society to a passive role. This paper aims to analyze if SI requires an evolution of the TH framework. The methodology is a multi-case study based on SI projects and initiatives in the energy sector. The main findings are that citizens are involved in SI though to various extents: there are SI projects carried out “for” citizens, “with” citizens, and to a much lesser extent; “by” citizens. SI in the energy sector rely also on the commitment of the local government and the presence of social enterprises. Therefore, we suggest that a Quadruple Helix (QH) approach may be necessary for energy-related SI.","PeriodicalId":509643,"journal":{"name":"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management","volume":"44 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4468/2023.2.04bovi.coletti.vernay","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social innovation (SI) aims at improving people’s life when technological or business innovations are not sufficient. However, the classic Triple Helix (TH) theory does not explicitly deal with SI, and relegates civil society to a passive role. This paper aims to analyze if SI requires an evolution of the TH framework. The methodology is a multi-case study based on SI projects and initiatives in the energy sector. The main findings are that citizens are involved in SI though to various extents: there are SI projects carried out “for” citizens, “with” citizens, and to a much lesser extent; “by” citizens. SI in the energy sector rely also on the commitment of the local government and the presence of social enterprises. Therefore, we suggest that a Quadruple Helix (QH) approach may be necessary for energy-related SI.
社会创新(SI)的目的是在技术或商业创新不足的情况下改善人们的生活。然而,经典的三重螺旋(TH)理论并未明确涉及社会创新,并将公民社会置于被动地位。本文旨在分析 SI 是否需要对 TH 框架进行演变。研究方法是基于能源领域的 SI 项目和倡议进行多案例研究。主要发现是公民在不同程度上参与了 SI:有 "为 "公民开展的 SI 项目,有 "与 "公民开展的 SI 项目,也有 "由 "公民开展的 SI 项目。能源行业的社会参与还有赖于当地政府的承诺和社会企业的存在。因此,我们认为,与能源相关的 SI 可能需要一种四重螺旋(QH)方法。