Critique on Salafibism and it’s Significance for Indonesian Islamic Moderation: Study on Khaled Abou El-Fadhl’s Thought

Mazahib Pub Date : 2023-12-17 DOI:10.21093/mj.v22i2.7046
Muhyar Fanani, Bambang Iswanto
{"title":"Critique on Salafibism and it’s Significance for Indonesian Islamic Moderation: Study on Khaled Abou El-Fadhl’s Thought","authors":"Muhyar Fanani, Bambang Iswanto","doi":"10.21093/mj.v22i2.7046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to prove the importance of Khaled Abou el-Fadhl's (b. 1963) critique on Salafibism for mainstreaming Islamic moderation in contemporary Indonesia. This research examines Khaled's critique using the approach of ‘ilm uṣūl al-fiqh, a technique that analyzes the nature, secrets, and purposes of Islamic teachings including its laws. The problem examined in this research is the significance of Khaled's critique on Salafibism for mainstreaming Islamic moderation in contemporary Indonesia. This research concludes that from the perspective of ‘ilm uṣūl al-fiqh, Khaled's critique on Salafibism is crucial for mainstreaming Islamic modernization in present-day Indonesia. The significance of the critique lies in three things: (1). Providing the new awareness and energy for Indonesian Islamic scholars to campaign for moderate Islam and rejects puritanical Islam, especially Salafibism. (2). It provides theoretical guidance for the Islamic moderation movement in Indonesia, especially the importance of the balance between literalism and maqāṣid as well as between text and context in understanding the holy book. (3). Creating the practical guidance for the Islamic moderation movement in Indonesia to counter extremism. This research indicates that adopting a moderate approach to Islam holds significant promise for achieving local, national, and global religious harmony. In contrast, the puritanical approach, which hinders such concord, should be abandoned.   Keywords: Critique, puritanism, salafibism, Islamic moderation, contemporary Indonesia","PeriodicalId":31362,"journal":{"name":"Mazahib","volume":"419 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mazahib","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v22i2.7046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to prove the importance of Khaled Abou el-Fadhl's (b. 1963) critique on Salafibism for mainstreaming Islamic moderation in contemporary Indonesia. This research examines Khaled's critique using the approach of ‘ilm uṣūl al-fiqh, a technique that analyzes the nature, secrets, and purposes of Islamic teachings including its laws. The problem examined in this research is the significance of Khaled's critique on Salafibism for mainstreaming Islamic moderation in contemporary Indonesia. This research concludes that from the perspective of ‘ilm uṣūl al-fiqh, Khaled's critique on Salafibism is crucial for mainstreaming Islamic modernization in present-day Indonesia. The significance of the critique lies in three things: (1). Providing the new awareness and energy for Indonesian Islamic scholars to campaign for moderate Islam and rejects puritanical Islam, especially Salafibism. (2). It provides theoretical guidance for the Islamic moderation movement in Indonesia, especially the importance of the balance between literalism and maqāṣid as well as between text and context in understanding the holy book. (3). Creating the practical guidance for the Islamic moderation movement in Indonesia to counter extremism. This research indicates that adopting a moderate approach to Islam holds significant promise for achieving local, national, and global religious harmony. In contrast, the puritanical approach, which hinders such concord, should be abandoned.   Keywords: Critique, puritanism, salafibism, Islamic moderation, contemporary Indonesia
萨拉菲比主义批判及其对印度尼西亚伊斯兰温和派的意义:哈立德-阿布-法德尔思想研究
本文旨在证明哈立德-阿布-法德尔(Khaled Abou el-Fadhl,生于 1963 年)对萨拉菲比主义的批判对当代印度尼西亚伊斯兰温和派主流化的重要性。本研究采用 "ilm uṣūl al-fiqh"(一种分析伊斯兰教义(包括其法律)的性质、秘密和目的的技术)的方法来研究哈立德的批判。本研究探讨的问题是哈立德对萨拉菲比主义的批判对当代印尼伊斯兰温和派主流化的意义。本研究的结论是,从 "伊斯兰教律 "的角度来看,哈立德对萨拉菲比主义的批判对当今印尼伊斯兰现代化的主流化至关重要。批判的意义在于以下三点:(1).为印尼伊斯兰学者提供了新的意识和能量,使他们能够为温和的伊斯兰教而奋斗,反对清教伊斯兰教,尤其是萨拉菲比主义。(2).为印尼的伊斯兰温和运动提供理论指导,特别是在理解圣典时,字面主义与maqāṣid之间的平衡以及文本与上下文之间的平衡的重要性。(3).为印尼伊斯兰温和运动提供实际指导,以打击极端主义。这项研究表明,对伊斯兰教采取温和的态度对于实现地方、国家和全球宗教和谐具有重大意义。与此相反,阻碍这种和谐的清教方法应予以摒弃。 关键词批判、清教主义、萨拉菲比主义、伊斯兰温和主义、当代印度尼西亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信