TÜRKİYEDEKİ ORTAOKUL 5-7. SINIF SOSYAL BİLGİLER DERS KİTAPLARINDA YER ALAN SORULARIN GALLAGHER VE ASCHNER’IN SORU SINIFLAMASINA GÖRE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Deniz Yüceer, Güneş Kılınç, Sevgi COŞKUN KESKİN
{"title":"TÜRKİYEDEKİ ORTAOKUL 5-7. SINIF SOSYAL BİLGİLER DERS KİTAPLARINDA YER ALAN SORULARIN GALLAGHER VE ASCHNER’IN SORU SINIFLAMASINA GÖRE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ","authors":"Deniz Yüceer, Güneş Kılınç, Sevgi COŞKUN KESKİN","doi":"10.17556/erziefd.1316446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, questions in 5th, 6th, and 7th grade social studies textbooks were evaluated using Gallagher and Aschner's question categorization to determine their level. A document analysis was conducted; the single screening model, one of the screening models, was used in this study. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis. Depending on the Gallagher and Aschner question classification, four themes were identified: cognitive memory, convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and evaluative thinking. The ratio of questions to instructional time in the learning domains was evaluated to determine which level was most intensive. As a result, questions focus on cognitive memory and convergent thinking; divergent and evaluative thinking is undervalued; children's abilities in remembering, identifying, deciding, comparing, making connections, summarizing, offering examples, and interpreting are emphasized. In addition, the level of questions directed to children during and after instruction was found to vary and not be evenly distributed across learning areas.","PeriodicalId":503115,"journal":{"name":"Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1316446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, questions in 5th, 6th, and 7th grade social studies textbooks were evaluated using Gallagher and Aschner's question categorization to determine their level. A document analysis was conducted; the single screening model, one of the screening models, was used in this study. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis. Depending on the Gallagher and Aschner question classification, four themes were identified: cognitive memory, convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and evaluative thinking. The ratio of questions to instructional time in the learning domains was evaluated to determine which level was most intensive. As a result, questions focus on cognitive memory and convergent thinking; divergent and evaluative thinking is undervalued; children's abilities in remembering, identifying, deciding, comparing, making connections, summarizing, offering examples, and interpreting are emphasized. In addition, the level of questions directed to children during and after instruction was found to vary and not be evenly distributed across learning areas.
评估土耳其中学 5-7 年级社会课教科书中的问题根据 Gallagher 和 Aschner 的问题分类法对土耳其中学五至七年级社会课教科书中的问题进行评估
本研究采用 Gallagher 和 Aschner 的问题分类法对五、六、七年级社会课教科书中的问题进行了评估,以确定其水平。对文件进行了分析;本研究采用了单一筛选模式,即筛选模式之一。数据分析采用了描述性分析。根据 Gallagher 和 Aschner 的问题分类,确定了四个主题:认知记忆、聚合思维、发散思维和评价思维。对学习领域中问题与教学时间的比例进行了评估,以确定哪个层次的问题最密集。结果是,问题侧重于认知记忆和聚合思维;发散思维和评价思维被低估;儿童在记忆、识别、判断、比较、建立联系、总结、举例和解释方面的能力被强调。此外,还发现在教学过程中和教学结束后,向儿童提出的问题水平参差不齐,在各学习领域的分布也不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信