Educators’ Perceptions of Professional Growth Plans in the Context of Professional Learning Communities

Cyndi Caniglia, Kathryn Picanco, Kristen Arnold, Sharon Naccarato
{"title":"Educators’ Perceptions of Professional Growth Plans in the Context of Professional Learning Communities","authors":"Cyndi Caniglia, Kathryn Picanco, Kristen Arnold, Sharon Naccarato","doi":"10.46767/kfp.2016-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional Growth Plans (PGPs), a model of professional development for educators, were completed in the context of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) as part of a grant from a state Professional Educator Standards Board. Participants were in the Pacific Northwest of the United States and represented different educator roles in two urban elementary schools. The PGP process was introduced in PLCs and focused on the implementation of High Leverage Practices (HLPs) for inclusive classrooms (McLeskey et al., 2019). In a collaborative effort with university facilitators, educators engaged in tenets of Participatory Action Research (PAR) through enactment of the PGP process to implement and reflect on outcomes related to their use of HLPs. Educators selected PGP goals focused on areas of instructional growth and improvement of student performance. PAR was enacted in the context of educators’ individual instructional settings through implementation of PGPs. The purpose of the grant was to familiarize and support educators in the PGP process. The purpose of the study was to identify educators’ perceived benefits and challenges with the implementation of PGPs within the context of a collaborative PLC.","PeriodicalId":320807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership","volume":"42 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional Growth Plans (PGPs), a model of professional development for educators, were completed in the context of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) as part of a grant from a state Professional Educator Standards Board. Participants were in the Pacific Northwest of the United States and represented different educator roles in two urban elementary schools. The PGP process was introduced in PLCs and focused on the implementation of High Leverage Practices (HLPs) for inclusive classrooms (McLeskey et al., 2019). In a collaborative effort with university facilitators, educators engaged in tenets of Participatory Action Research (PAR) through enactment of the PGP process to implement and reflect on outcomes related to their use of HLPs. Educators selected PGP goals focused on areas of instructional growth and improvement of student performance. PAR was enacted in the context of educators’ individual instructional settings through implementation of PGPs. The purpose of the grant was to familiarize and support educators in the PGP process. The purpose of the study was to identify educators’ perceived benefits and challenges with the implementation of PGPs within the context of a collaborative PLC.
教育工作者对专业学习社区背景下的专业成长计划的看法
专业成长计划(PGP)是教育工作者专业发展的一种模式,在专业学习社区(PLC)的背景下完成,是州专业教育工作者标准委员会拨款的一部分。参与者来自美国西北太平洋地区,代表了两所城市小学中不同的教育工作者角色。在 PLC 中引入了 PGP 流程,重点是在全纳课堂中实施高杠杆实践(HLP)(McLeskey 等人,2019 年)。在与大学促进者的合作努力中,教育工作者通过制定 PGP 流程,参与了参与式行动研究(PAR)的原则,以实施和反思与使用 HLPs 相关的成果。教育工作者选择的 PGP 目标侧重于教学增长和学生成绩的提高。通过实施 PGP,PAR 在教育工作者的个人教学环境中得以实施。拨款的目的是让教育工作者熟悉并支持 PGP 流程。研究的目的是确定教育工作者在协作式 PLC 的背景下实施 PGP 所感受到的益处和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信