Retained epidural catheter: an update

Kevin Teck Meng Tan, Dinakren Balashanmugam, Mazlila Meor Ahmad Shah, Afiza Hani Md Pazil, Ahmad Suhaimi Amir, Husaini Jawahir, Norliza Mohd Nor
{"title":"Retained epidural catheter: an update","authors":"Kevin Teck Meng Tan, Dinakren Balashanmugam, Mazlila Meor Ahmad Shah, Afiza Hani Md Pazil, Ahmad Suhaimi Amir, Husaini Jawahir, Norliza Mohd Nor","doi":"10.35119/myja.v2i2.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The retained catheter fragment is a rare complication when performing epidural techniques. There is a paucity of studies available, with Australian data quoting an incidence of 1 in 60,000. For this article, we reviewed 36 case reports of retained epidural catheters between 1995 and 2020. The case reports found computed tomography scans to be the most reliable modality to investigate a retained epidural catheter. The decision to surgically remove or treat conservatively should be multidisciplinary with most operations involving symptomatic or long fragments. In our review, we found 25 (69.4%) reports of surgical removal, with 21 opting for immediate removal. Conservatively treated retained fragments should be monitored for neurological or infective complications. Patients should receive a follow-up plan and be educated regarding red flag symptoms to facilitate further management. For future reference, a detailed documentation of the incident, parties involved, discussions, and decisions should be made.","PeriodicalId":507738,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/myja.v2i2.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The retained catheter fragment is a rare complication when performing epidural techniques. There is a paucity of studies available, with Australian data quoting an incidence of 1 in 60,000. For this article, we reviewed 36 case reports of retained epidural catheters between 1995 and 2020. The case reports found computed tomography scans to be the most reliable modality to investigate a retained epidural catheter. The decision to surgically remove or treat conservatively should be multidisciplinary with most operations involving symptomatic or long fragments. In our review, we found 25 (69.4%) reports of surgical removal, with 21 opting for immediate removal. Conservatively treated retained fragments should be monitored for neurological or infective complications. Patients should receive a follow-up plan and be educated regarding red flag symptoms to facilitate further management. For future reference, a detailed documentation of the incident, parties involved, discussions, and decisions should be made.
硬膜外导管留置:最新进展
导管碎片滞留是硬膜外麻醉技术中一种罕见的并发症。这方面的研究很少,澳大利亚的数据显示其发生率为六万分之一。本文回顾了 1995 年至 2020 年间 36 例硬膜外导管残留病例报告。这些病例报告发现,计算机断层扫描是调查硬膜外导管滞留的最可靠方法。手术切除或保守治疗的决定应由多学科专家共同做出,大多数手术涉及无症状或较长的碎片。在我们的综述中,我们发现了 25 篇(69.4%)手术移除导管的报告,其中 21 篇选择了立即移除。保守治疗后的残留碎片应注意神经系统或感染并发症。患者应收到一份随访计划,并接受有关红色标志症状的教育,以便进一步处理。应详细记录事件、参与方、讨论和决定,以备将来参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信