Application of para. 4 of Article 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedural Code of the Russian Federation: issues raised by the court practice

O. F. Zasemkova
{"title":"Application of para. 4 of Article 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedural Code of the Russian Federation: issues raised by the court practice","authors":"O. F. Zasemkova","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.076-085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the practice of application of Article 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedural Code of the Russian Federation by Russian courts. On the basis of the doctrine and judicial practice analysis, the author highlights two approaches to the interpretation of the condition limiting the sanctioned party`s access to justice which allows to transfer a dispute to the jurisdiction of the Russian arbitration court despite the clause referring the dispute to a foreign court or arbitration. Considering each of these approaches, the author concludes that this condition should not be interpreted broadly and that the mere fact of the existence of personal or sectoral sanctions is not sufficient to establish that he has obstacles in access to justice. In order to correct the prevailing approach and to ensure a uniform interpretation of para. 4 Art. 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, it is proposed to adopt the Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. This Resolution must contain the rebuttable presumption that the sanctions imposed by a foreign state in respect of a Russian person limit his right of access to justice and, accordingly, provide grounds for “transfer” the dispute to the jurisdiction of the Russian court.","PeriodicalId":508920,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":"70 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.076-085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the practice of application of Article 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedural Code of the Russian Federation by Russian courts. On the basis of the doctrine and judicial practice analysis, the author highlights two approaches to the interpretation of the condition limiting the sanctioned party`s access to justice which allows to transfer a dispute to the jurisdiction of the Russian arbitration court despite the clause referring the dispute to a foreign court or arbitration. Considering each of these approaches, the author concludes that this condition should not be interpreted broadly and that the mere fact of the existence of personal or sectoral sanctions is not sufficient to establish that he has obstacles in access to justice. In order to correct the prevailing approach and to ensure a uniform interpretation of para. 4 Art. 248.1 of the Arbitrazh Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, it is proposed to adopt the Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. This Resolution must contain the rebuttable presumption that the sanctions imposed by a foreign state in respect of a Russian person limit his right of access to justice and, accordingly, provide grounds for “transfer” the dispute to the jurisdiction of the Russian court.
俄罗斯联邦仲裁程序法典》第 248.1 条第 4 款的适用:法院实践中提出的问题俄罗斯联邦仲裁程序法典》第 248.1 条第 4 款的适用:法院实践提出的问题
文章研究了俄罗斯法院适用《俄罗斯联邦仲裁程序法典》第 248.1 条的实践。在学说和司法实践分析的基础上,作者强调了对限制被制裁方诉诸司法的条件的两种解释方法,该条件允许将争议移交给俄罗斯仲裁法院管辖,尽管该条款将争议移交给外国法院或仲裁机构。考虑到上述每一种方法,提交人得出结论认为,这一条件不应作广义解释,仅仅存在个人或部门制裁的事实不足以证明他在诉诸司法方面存在障碍。为了纠正普遍的做法,并确保对第 4 款的统一解释,提交人提出了以下建议仲裁法》第 248.1 条第 4 款的统一解释。为了纠正现行做法并确保对《俄罗斯联邦仲裁程序法典》第 248.1 条第 4 款的统一解释,建议通过 《俄罗斯联邦最高法院全体会议决议》。该决议必须包含可反驳的推定,即外国对俄罗斯人实施的制裁限制了其诉诸司法的权利,并因此提供了将争端 "移交 "俄罗斯法院管辖的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信