Automatic Detection of Electrodermal Activity Events during Sleep

Signals Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.3390/signals4040048
Jacopo Piccini, E. August, Sami Leon Noel Aziz Hanna, Tiina Siilak, E. Arnardóttir
{"title":"Automatic Detection of Electrodermal Activity Events during Sleep","authors":"Jacopo Piccini, E. August, Sami Leon Noel Aziz Hanna, Tiina Siilak, E. Arnardóttir","doi":"10.3390/signals4040048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, there is significant interest in developing algorithms for processing electrodermal activity (EDA) signals recorded during sleep. The interest is driven by the growing popularity and increased accuracy of wearable devices capable of recording EDA signals. If properly processed and analysed, they can be used for various purposes, such as identifying sleep stages and sleep-disordered breathing, while being minimally intrusive. Due to the tedious nature of manually scoring EDA sleep signals, the development of an algorithm to automate scoring is necessary. In this paper, we present a novel scoring algorithm for the detection of EDA events and EDA storms using signal processing techniques. We apply the algorithm to EDA recordings from two different and unrelated studies that have also been manually scored and evaluate its performances in terms of precision, recall, and F1 score. We obtain F1 scores of about 69% for EDA events and of about 56% for EDA storms. In comparison to the literature values for scoring agreement between experts, we observe a strong agreement between automatic and manual scoring of EDA events and a moderate agreement between automatic and manual scoring of EDA storms. EDA events and EDA storms detected with the algorithm can be further processed and used as training variables in machine learning algorithms to classify sleep health.","PeriodicalId":93815,"journal":{"name":"Signals","volume":"78 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/signals4040048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, there is significant interest in developing algorithms for processing electrodermal activity (EDA) signals recorded during sleep. The interest is driven by the growing popularity and increased accuracy of wearable devices capable of recording EDA signals. If properly processed and analysed, they can be used for various purposes, such as identifying sleep stages and sleep-disordered breathing, while being minimally intrusive. Due to the tedious nature of manually scoring EDA sleep signals, the development of an algorithm to automate scoring is necessary. In this paper, we present a novel scoring algorithm for the detection of EDA events and EDA storms using signal processing techniques. We apply the algorithm to EDA recordings from two different and unrelated studies that have also been manually scored and evaluate its performances in terms of precision, recall, and F1 score. We obtain F1 scores of about 69% for EDA events and of about 56% for EDA storms. In comparison to the literature values for scoring agreement between experts, we observe a strong agreement between automatic and manual scoring of EDA events and a moderate agreement between automatic and manual scoring of EDA storms. EDA events and EDA storms detected with the algorithm can be further processed and used as training variables in machine learning algorithms to classify sleep health.
自动检测睡眠期间的皮电活动事件
目前,人们对开发用于处理睡眠期间记录的皮电活动(EDA)信号的算法兴趣浓厚。这种兴趣是由能够记录 EDA 信号的可穿戴设备的日益普及和精确度的提高推动的。如果处理和分析得当,这些信号可用于各种目的,如识别睡眠阶段和睡眠呼吸紊乱,同时将侵入性降至最低。由于对 EDA 睡眠信号进行人工评分十分繁琐,因此有必要开发一种自动评分算法。在本文中,我们介绍了一种利用信号处理技术检测 EDA 事件和 EDA 风暴的新型评分算法。我们将该算法应用于两项不同且不相关的研究中的 EDA 记录,这些记录也经过了人工评分,并从精确度、召回率和 F1 分数等方面评估了该算法的性能。我们得到的 EDA 事件的 F1 分数约为 69%,EDA 风暴的 F1 分数约为 56%。与专家间评分一致性的文献值相比,我们发现 EDA 事件的自动评分和人工评分之间的一致性很高,而 EDA 风暴的自动评分和人工评分之间的一致性适中。该算法检测出的EDA事件和EDA风暴可进一步处理,并作为机器学习算法的训练变量,用于对睡眠健康状况进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信