The Welfare State: The Challenges of Sustainability

S. Kuhnle
{"title":"The Welfare State: The Challenges of Sustainability","authors":"S. Kuhnle","doi":"10.15388/stepp.2023.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is nothing new that ‘the welfare state’ faces serious challenges. Ever since the 1970s, Western welfare states have by many researchers been regarded as being in crisis, but despite many policy adjustments and important variations among Western welfare states, the overall scope of the welfare state, as measured by social expenditure per capita, has by and large increased. At the same time, we can observe a globalization of social policy and the emergence of a more active social role of the state in many parts of the world during recent decades. But new challenges due to a variety of new security issues and new dimensions of uncertainty have appeared, not least following the unanticipated Russian large-scale invasion of and war on Ukraine and concomitant international political developments. Political unease about the future of the welfare state and scope of social policies in different parts of the world has escalated. Welfare political priorities must compete with increased priorities for defense, cyber security, and issues related to energy, climate, food, and the environment. Motivations for state responsibility for citizen welfare and well-being – as well as for the type and scope of responsibility - vary. The fate of the welfare state and social policies is clearly a question of political and normative commitment to what kind of socially active state is desired. The paper addresses the following topics: Why should a state be socially active? What were historical reasons for developing welfare states? What are current motivations for developing and maintaining welfare states? What are the economic, political, and moral dimensions of welfare state sustainability? In addition to possible national political responses to social challenges, it is argued that in a globalized world reinforced international cooperation, coordination and regulation may be necessary to achieve sustainability of (national) welfare states.","PeriodicalId":506308,"journal":{"name":"Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika","volume":"175 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/stepp.2023.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is nothing new that ‘the welfare state’ faces serious challenges. Ever since the 1970s, Western welfare states have by many researchers been regarded as being in crisis, but despite many policy adjustments and important variations among Western welfare states, the overall scope of the welfare state, as measured by social expenditure per capita, has by and large increased. At the same time, we can observe a globalization of social policy and the emergence of a more active social role of the state in many parts of the world during recent decades. But new challenges due to a variety of new security issues and new dimensions of uncertainty have appeared, not least following the unanticipated Russian large-scale invasion of and war on Ukraine and concomitant international political developments. Political unease about the future of the welfare state and scope of social policies in different parts of the world has escalated. Welfare political priorities must compete with increased priorities for defense, cyber security, and issues related to energy, climate, food, and the environment. Motivations for state responsibility for citizen welfare and well-being – as well as for the type and scope of responsibility - vary. The fate of the welfare state and social policies is clearly a question of political and normative commitment to what kind of socially active state is desired. The paper addresses the following topics: Why should a state be socially active? What were historical reasons for developing welfare states? What are current motivations for developing and maintaining welfare states? What are the economic, political, and moral dimensions of welfare state sustainability? In addition to possible national political responses to social challenges, it is argued that in a globalized world reinforced international cooperation, coordination and regulation may be necessary to achieve sustainability of (national) welfare states.
福利国家:可持续性的挑战
福利国家 "面临严峻挑战并不是什么新鲜事。自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,西方福利国家一直被许多研究者视为处于危机之中,但尽管西方福利国家进行了许多政策调整并存在重大差异,以人均社会支出衡量的福利国家的总体规模大体上仍在扩大。与此同时,我们可以看到,近几十年来,世界许多地方的社会政策都在全球化,国家也开始扮演更加积极的社会角色。但是,由于各种新的安全问题和新的不确定性,新的挑战已经出现,尤其是在俄罗斯出乎意料地大规模入侵乌克兰并对其发动战争以及随之而来的国际政治事态发展之后。世界不同地区对未来福利国家和社会政策范围的政治不安已经升级。福利政治优先事项必须与国防、网络安全以及与能源、气候、粮食和环境相关问题的优先级的提高相竞争。国家对公民福利和福祉承担责任的动机以及责任的类型和范围各不相同。福利国家和社会政策的命运显然是一个政治和规范承诺问题,即人们希望建立一个什么样的社会积极国家。本文探讨了以下主题:为什么国家应具有社会积极性?发展福利国家的历史原因是什么?当前发展和维持福利国家的动机是什么?福利国家可持续性的经济、政治和道德层面是什么?除了对社会挑战可能采取的国家政治应对措施外,本文还认为,在全球化世界中,加强国际合作、协调和监管对于实现(国家)福利国家的可持续性可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信