Copyright Amendment Bill: Contradictions to Hit the South African Education Sector

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
K. Tomaselli, Hetta Pieterse
{"title":"Copyright Amendment Bill: Contradictions to Hit the South African Education Sector","authors":"K. Tomaselli, Hetta Pieterse","doi":"10.25159/1947-9417/14325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article maps the latest developments in South Africa’s complex battle to update its Copyright Amendment Bill across a path strewn with legal pitfalls. Driving the agenda of the American-derived “fair use” and other copyright exceptions at the expense of content creators are the state, under the guise of “access” to education, and Big Tech companies focused on data mining, paraded as users’ rights to content. The emerging Bill has given rise to a set of major contradictions that will directly and negatively impact especially educational book publishing, from primary to tertiary sectors. The updated Bill risks violating authors’ rights and international treaties. The authors identify contradictions in public policy and sketch the most contentious aspects within debates around the Bill. The implications for the national research economy are considered, while the need to adequately protect the copyright of open access content is raised. The article closes with a summary of the issues of “fair use” and fair dealing, the predatory implications, and the outcome of the contradictions for the industry. The relevance of writing about a moving target is because a) the Bill has been in contestation for eight years now; b) universities and the whole educational sector have failed to respond coherently to the threats portended in the Bill; c) the nature of the claims and counter-arguments raised by the Bill will continue well after it has been promulgated; and d) the analysis is alert to  open access imperatives and to the threat of South Africa becoming a haven for servers hosting pirated content should the Bill become law.","PeriodicalId":44983,"journal":{"name":"Education As Change","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education As Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/14325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article maps the latest developments in South Africa’s complex battle to update its Copyright Amendment Bill across a path strewn with legal pitfalls. Driving the agenda of the American-derived “fair use” and other copyright exceptions at the expense of content creators are the state, under the guise of “access” to education, and Big Tech companies focused on data mining, paraded as users’ rights to content. The emerging Bill has given rise to a set of major contradictions that will directly and negatively impact especially educational book publishing, from primary to tertiary sectors. The updated Bill risks violating authors’ rights and international treaties. The authors identify contradictions in public policy and sketch the most contentious aspects within debates around the Bill. The implications for the national research economy are considered, while the need to adequately protect the copyright of open access content is raised. The article closes with a summary of the issues of “fair use” and fair dealing, the predatory implications, and the outcome of the contradictions for the industry. The relevance of writing about a moving target is because a) the Bill has been in contestation for eight years now; b) universities and the whole educational sector have failed to respond coherently to the threats portended in the Bill; c) the nature of the claims and counter-arguments raised by the Bill will continue well after it has been promulgated; and d) the analysis is alert to  open access imperatives and to the threat of South Africa becoming a haven for servers hosting pirated content should the Bill become law.
版权修正法案》:南非教育部门面临的矛盾问题
本文描绘了南非为更新其《版权修正法案》而进行的复杂斗争的最新进展,这场斗争的道路上布满了法律陷阱。以内容创作者为代价,推动源于美国的 "合理使用 "和其他版权例外议程的是打着教育 "准入 "幌子的国家和专注于数据挖掘的大科技公司,后者则以用户对内容的权利为幌子。新法案引发了一系列重大矛盾,将对教育图书出版,特别是从初等教育到高等教育产生直接的负面影响。更新后的法案有可能侵犯作者的权利和违反国际条约。作者指出了公共政策中的矛盾之处,并概述了围绕该法案的辩论中最具争议的方面。文章考虑了对国家研究经济的影响,同时提出了充分保护开放存取内容版权的必要性。文章最后总结了 "合理使用 "和公平交易问题、掠夺性影响以及矛盾对行业的影响。之所以要写一个不断变化的目标,是因为:a)《法案》的争论已经持续了八年;b)大学和整个教育部门都未能对《法案》所预示的威胁做出一致的回应;c)《法案》所提出的主张和反驳的性质在《法案》颁布后仍将继续存在;d)文章分析了开放存取的必要性,以及一旦《法案》成为法律,南非将成为托管盗版内容的服务器天堂的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education As Change
Education As Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Education as Change is an accredited, peer reviewed scholarly online journal that publishes original articles reflecting critically on issues of equality in education and on the ways in which educational practices contribute to transformation in non-formal, formal and informal contexts. Critique, mainly understood in the tradition of critical pedagogies, is a constructive process which contributes towards a better world. Contributions from and about marginalised communities and from different knowledge traditions are encouraged. The articles could draw on any rigorous research methodology, as well as transdisciplinary approaches. Research of a very specialised or technical nature should be framed within relevant discourses. While specialised kinds of research are encouraged, authors are expected to write for a broader audience of educational researchers and practitioners without losing conceptual and theoretical depth and rigour. All sectors of education are covered in the journal. These include primary, secondary and tertiary education, adult education, worker education, educational policy and teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信