Werktreue Ideology in Clara Schumann’s and Franz Liszt’s Piano Transcriptions

Deirdre Toh
{"title":"Werktreue Ideology in Clara Schumann’s and Franz Liszt’s Piano Transcriptions","authors":"Deirdre Toh","doi":"10.35561/jsmi18237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The piano transcriptions of Clara Schumann (hereafter ‘Schumann’) and Franz Liszt capture the tensions surrounding the concepts of interiority and virtuosity in nineteenth-century Germany. The two composers’ transcriptions of Robert Schumann’s ‘Widmung’ could not be more different: one draws upon the faculty of the mind with its ‘spirit and depth’, the other prizes ‘spirit over the letter’ with its bodily engagement. Nonetheless, there is an important meeting point to be found between these two differing approaches in Liszt’s transcription of three Lieder by Schumann. In this article, I juxtapose Schumann and Liszt to demonstrate how their ideological differences concerning Werktreue, or ‘fidelity to the score’, problematize received notions of virtuosity and interiority. Alexander Stefaniak’s notion of elevated virtuosity, in which virtuosity can be legitimized with interiority for its attendant spirit and depth, offers a productive starting point to understanding Schumann’s and Liszt’s individual manner of transcription. Yet, it does not fully address how ideas of interiority and virtuosity depend upon ideological conceptions of the Work. To probe the interiority-virtuosity divide as it relates to the Work, I refer to the history of improvisation to nuance nineteenth-century attitudes towards virtuosity and to provide a critical discourse around mental and physical engagement with music. The categories of Work and improvisation prove to be much more separated for Schumann than for Liszt– a separation that is bound up with Schumann’s ideal of faithfulness to the Work.","PeriodicalId":145717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Musicology in Ireland","volume":"264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Musicology in Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35561/jsmi18237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The piano transcriptions of Clara Schumann (hereafter ‘Schumann’) and Franz Liszt capture the tensions surrounding the concepts of interiority and virtuosity in nineteenth-century Germany. The two composers’ transcriptions of Robert Schumann’s ‘Widmung’ could not be more different: one draws upon the faculty of the mind with its ‘spirit and depth’, the other prizes ‘spirit over the letter’ with its bodily engagement. Nonetheless, there is an important meeting point to be found between these two differing approaches in Liszt’s transcription of three Lieder by Schumann. In this article, I juxtapose Schumann and Liszt to demonstrate how their ideological differences concerning Werktreue, or ‘fidelity to the score’, problematize received notions of virtuosity and interiority. Alexander Stefaniak’s notion of elevated virtuosity, in which virtuosity can be legitimized with interiority for its attendant spirit and depth, offers a productive starting point to understanding Schumann’s and Liszt’s individual manner of transcription. Yet, it does not fully address how ideas of interiority and virtuosity depend upon ideological conceptions of the Work. To probe the interiority-virtuosity divide as it relates to the Work, I refer to the history of improvisation to nuance nineteenth-century attitudes towards virtuosity and to provide a critical discourse around mental and physical engagement with music. The categories of Work and improvisation prove to be much more separated for Schumann than for Liszt– a separation that is bound up with Schumann’s ideal of faithfulness to the Work.
克拉拉-舒曼和弗朗茨-李斯特钢琴曲中的音乐家意识形态
克拉拉-舒曼(以下简称 "舒曼")和弗朗茨-李斯特的钢琴改编曲捕捉到了十九世纪德国围绕内在性和技巧性概念的紧张关系。这两位作曲家对罗伯特-舒曼的《维德蒙》的改编再不同不过了:一位运用了 "精神和深度 "的心智能力,而另一位则通过身体的参与,推崇 "精神胜于文字"。然而,在李斯特改编舒曼的三首《恋曲》中,这两种不同的方法却有一个重要的交汇点。在这篇文章中,我将舒曼和李斯特并列在一起,以说明他们在Werktreue(或 "忠于乐谱")方面的意识形态差异是如何使人们所接受的演奏技巧和内在性概念出现问题的。亚历山大-斯蒂法尼亚克(Alexander Stefaniak)的 "高超技艺"(elevated virtuosity)概念为理解舒曼和李斯特各自的转录方式提供了一个富有成效的出发点。然而,它并没有完全解决内在性和精湛性的概念如何依赖于作品的意识形态概念的问题。为了探究与《作品》相关的内在性与精湛性之间的分歧,我参考了即兴演奏的历史,以细化十九世纪对精湛性的态度,并提供了有关精神和身体参与音乐的批判性论述。与李斯特相比,舒曼将《作品》与即兴创作区分得更开--这种区分与舒曼忠实于《作品》的理想息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信