Fulfillment of the obligation to deposit the debt to the escrow account as an alternative to its deposit to the notary deposit under the laws of Ukraine

Svitlana Synchuk, Iryna Shpuhanych
{"title":"Fulfillment of the obligation to deposit the debt to the escrow account as an alternative to its deposit to the notary deposit under the laws of Ukraine","authors":"Svitlana Synchuk, Iryna Shpuhanych","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annotation. The article deals with the extension of the scope of an escrow account contract application in Ukraine. Amendments were made to Article 537 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, which introduced the possibility of fulfilling the obligation by the debtor by depositing cash or securities into the escrow account. The author analyzes the conditions envisaged by law under which the aforementioned mechanism is available for use. Based on the study of regulatory legal acts of the National Bank, the author establishes the algorithm of actions in case of its application, in particular, the procedure for the participation of a notary. The author analyzes and compares the legislative provisions on the procedure for returning funds to the person who deposited them in order to fulfill an obligation into the deposit of a notary and into the escrow account. In this context, the author analyzes the meaning of the term \"depositor\" in the legislation on the depository system and in the Procedure for Notarial Acts by Notaries of Ukraine, and draws conclusions about the differences in their meaning. It is found out that the return of monetary amounts and securities to the person who deposited them with a notary is allowed only with the consent of the creditor, which must be in writing. At the same time, termination of the escrow account contract is also permitted only upon receipt of the beneficiary’s written consent. The possibility of returning funds without his consent exists only if there is a relevant court decision. The author examines the peculiarities of an escrow account contract in the context of the beneficiary’s right to instruct the bank to transfer funds from the account to another person, as well as the period during which funds may be received from it as compared to a notary’s deposit. The author clarifies the procedure for protecting the rights and interests of a person who has been unreasonably denied a notarial act such as acceptance of a sum of money or securities from a debtor and crediting them to an escrow account. The author proposes to amend the Law of Ukraine \"On the Notary Office\" in accordance with the new wording of Article 537 of the Civil Code of Ukraine with an indication of such type of notarial acts as acceptance of a debt from a debtor with opening of an escrow account.","PeriodicalId":505933,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Annotation. The article deals with the extension of the scope of an escrow account contract application in Ukraine. Amendments were made to Article 537 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, which introduced the possibility of fulfilling the obligation by the debtor by depositing cash or securities into the escrow account. The author analyzes the conditions envisaged by law under which the aforementioned mechanism is available for use. Based on the study of regulatory legal acts of the National Bank, the author establishes the algorithm of actions in case of its application, in particular, the procedure for the participation of a notary. The author analyzes and compares the legislative provisions on the procedure for returning funds to the person who deposited them in order to fulfill an obligation into the deposit of a notary and into the escrow account. In this context, the author analyzes the meaning of the term "depositor" in the legislation on the depository system and in the Procedure for Notarial Acts by Notaries of Ukraine, and draws conclusions about the differences in their meaning. It is found out that the return of monetary amounts and securities to the person who deposited them with a notary is allowed only with the consent of the creditor, which must be in writing. At the same time, termination of the escrow account contract is also permitted only upon receipt of the beneficiary’s written consent. The possibility of returning funds without his consent exists only if there is a relevant court decision. The author examines the peculiarities of an escrow account contract in the context of the beneficiary’s right to instruct the bank to transfer funds from the account to another person, as well as the period during which funds may be received from it as compared to a notary’s deposit. The author clarifies the procedure for protecting the rights and interests of a person who has been unreasonably denied a notarial act such as acceptance of a sum of money or securities from a debtor and crediting them to an escrow account. The author proposes to amend the Law of Ukraine "On the Notary Office" in accordance with the new wording of Article 537 of the Civil Code of Ukraine with an indication of such type of notarial acts as acceptance of a debt from a debtor with opening of an escrow account.
履行将债务存入托管账户的义务,以替代乌克兰法律规定的存入公证处的义务
说明。本条涉及在乌克兰扩大代管账户合同的适用范围。乌克兰民法典》第 537 条修正案引入了债务人通过向代管账户存入现金或证券履行义务的可能性。作者分析了法律规定的可使用上述机制的条件。根据对国家银行监管法案的研究,作者确定了适用该机制时的行动算法,特别是公证人参与的程序。作者分析并比较了关于将资金返还给存款人的程序的法律规定,以履行将资金存入公证人存款和托管账户的义务。在此背景下,作者分析了 "存款人 "一词在存款制度立法和《乌克兰公证人公证行为程序》中的含义,并就其含义的差异得出结论。结果发现,只有在债权人书面同意的情况下,才能将货币金额和证券返还给在公证处存款的人。同时,只有在收到受益人的书面同意后,才允许终止托管账户合同。只有在有相关法院判决的情况下,才有可能在未经受益人同意的情况下返还资金。作者从受益人有权指示银行将账户资金转给他人的角度研究了代管账户合同的特殊性,以及与公证存款相比,从代管账户接收资金的期限。提交人明确了保护被无理拒绝公证行为者权益的程序,如接受债务人的一笔资金或证券并将其记入托管账户。作者建议根据《乌克兰民法典》第 537 条的新措辞对《乌克兰公证处法》进行修订,指明接受债务人债务并开立代管账户等公证行为类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信