Addressing Multi-Unit Residential Management Conflicts: A Legal Study

Berlinaldo Patanroi
{"title":"Addressing Multi-Unit Residential Management Conflicts: A Legal Study","authors":"Berlinaldo Patanroi","doi":"10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study delves into the legal complexities and challenges arising from the management dualism disputes within the Association of Occupants and Owners of Flat Units (P3SRS) at the Bogor Valley Apartment. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, focusing on the analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through comprehensive library research. Central to this investigation is the exploration of the authority of P3SRS under Article 27 of the Regulation of the Minister of PUPR Number 14 of 2021. The study reveals that the existing dual administrations within the P3SRS lack the legitimate authority to manage the interests of the apartment's owners and residents as stipulated by the regulation. This situation has led to significant legal issues, primarily triggered by the dismissal and replacement of P3SRS management. The research further examines legal protection mechanisms for residents and owners affected by this dualism, highlighting two primary approaches: 'preventive legal protection' through government-led socialization and awareness campaigns, and 'repressive legal protection' as outlined in existing housing laws and regulations. Additionally, the study discusses the role of the independent Notary Honor Council (MKN) in providing legal protection for notaries concerning their civil responsibilities and the creation of legal documents. The findings underscore the necessity for clear regulatory frameworks and effective legal protection strategies to address and mitigate the challenges posed by management dualism in residential unit associations, providing valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and residents of multi-unit dwellings.Highlights: The study identifies illegal authority in dual residential management structures, highlighting a lack of legitimate power in handling owner and resident interests. It emphasizes the necessity of preventive legal protection, advocating for government-led awareness initiatives to educate communities about residential management laws. The research underscores the importance of repressive legal measures, detailing how existing housing regulations provide protection against management conflicts. Keywords: Residential Management, Legal Dualism, Preventive Protection, Repressive Protection, Regulatory Framework","PeriodicalId":31020,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsidee","volume":"64 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsidee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into the legal complexities and challenges arising from the management dualism disputes within the Association of Occupants and Owners of Flat Units (P3SRS) at the Bogor Valley Apartment. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, focusing on the analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through comprehensive library research. Central to this investigation is the exploration of the authority of P3SRS under Article 27 of the Regulation of the Minister of PUPR Number 14 of 2021. The study reveals that the existing dual administrations within the P3SRS lack the legitimate authority to manage the interests of the apartment's owners and residents as stipulated by the regulation. This situation has led to significant legal issues, primarily triggered by the dismissal and replacement of P3SRS management. The research further examines legal protection mechanisms for residents and owners affected by this dualism, highlighting two primary approaches: 'preventive legal protection' through government-led socialization and awareness campaigns, and 'repressive legal protection' as outlined in existing housing laws and regulations. Additionally, the study discusses the role of the independent Notary Honor Council (MKN) in providing legal protection for notaries concerning their civil responsibilities and the creation of legal documents. The findings underscore the necessity for clear regulatory frameworks and effective legal protection strategies to address and mitigate the challenges posed by management dualism in residential unit associations, providing valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and residents of multi-unit dwellings.Highlights: The study identifies illegal authority in dual residential management structures, highlighting a lack of legitimate power in handling owner and resident interests. It emphasizes the necessity of preventive legal protection, advocating for government-led awareness initiatives to educate communities about residential management laws. The research underscores the importance of repressive legal measures, detailing how existing housing regulations provide protection against management conflicts. Keywords: Residential Management, Legal Dualism, Preventive Protection, Repressive Protection, Regulatory Framework
解决多单元住宅管理冲突:法律研究
本研究深入探讨了茂物谷公寓单元住户和业主协会(P3SRS)内部管理二元论纠纷所带来的法律复杂性和挑战。本研究采用规范法学方法,通过全面的图书馆研究,重点分析一级、二级和三级法律资料。调查的核心内容是探讨 P3SRS 在 2021 年第 14 号 PUPR 部长条例第 27 条下的权限。研究结果表明,P3SRS 内部现有的双重管理机构缺乏条例规定的管理公寓业主和居民利益的合法权力。这种情况导致了重大的法律问题,主要由 P3SRS 管理层的解聘和更换引发。研究进一步探讨了受这种二元论影响的居民和业主的法律保护机制,强调了两种主要方法:通过政府主导的社会化和宣传活动提供 "预防性法律保护",以及现行住房法律法规中规定的 "压制性法律保护"。此外,研究还讨论了独立的公证人荣誉委员会(MKN)在为公证人提供民事责任和法律文件制作方面的法律保护方面所发挥的作用。研究结果强调,有必要制定明确的监管框架和有效的法律保护战略,以应对和减轻住宅单位协会中管理双重化带来的挑战,为政策制定者、法律从业者和多单元住宅的居民提供宝贵的见解: 本研究确定了双重住宅管理结构中的非法权力,强调了在处理业主和居民利益时缺乏合法权力。 研究强调了预防性法律保护的必要性,提倡由政府牵头开展宣传活动,对社区进行住宅管理法律方面的教育。 研究强调了压制性法律措施的重要性,详细介绍了现行住房法规如何为防止管理冲突提供保护。 关键词住宅管理 法律二元论 预防性保护 抑制性保护 监管框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信