HARMONIC SCALPEL COMPARED TO BIPOLAR COAGULATION FOR THYROIDECTOMY

Vasyl R. Antoniv, Oleg V. Shulyarenko, Taras M. Galyga, Larysa V. Shulyarenko, V. M. Perepadia
{"title":"HARMONIC SCALPEL COMPARED TO BIPOLAR COAGULATION FOR THYROIDECTOMY","authors":"Vasyl R. Antoniv, Oleg V. Shulyarenko, Taras M. Galyga, Larysa V. Shulyarenko, V. M. Perepadia","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The basic principles of high-efficient and safe thyroid surgery were established by 1920: identification and ligation of vessels, identification and preservation of laryngeal nerves, and parathyroid glands. Bleeding remains one of the major intraoperative complications of thyroid surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits of the Harmonic when compared with bipolar coagulation for open thyroidectomy. Materials and methods: We enrolled 85 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for multinodular disease from 2019 till 2022 years. Patients were randomly assigned to either the group 1 (43 patients in which the operation was performed entirely using the Harmonic scalpel (HS) and no other haemostatic tool) or the group 2 (42 patients in which the operation was performed using classic technique of resorbable ligature, bipolar coagulation). The inclusion criteria were scheduled total thyroidectomy for multinodular goiter. Results. There were no significant differences between two groups regarding age, gender, ASA distribution, so two groups are comparable. The mean operating time in the group 1 was 62.84±0.66 (M±m) minutes, and that in the group 2 was 75.19±0.42 (M±m) minutes for thyroidectomy, and there was 19.65% (i.e. 12.35 minutes) statistically significant reduction in the operating time using the Harmonic scalpel device (p<0.05). The 48 hours mean total amount of drainage was 69.05±0.88 (M±m) ml for group 1 and 81.40±0.64 (M±m) ml for group 2, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The rate of postoperative complications was comparable among the two groups (pχ2>0,05). Conclusions. The use of Harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery is safe and effective and is associated with a significant reduction in operative time without increasing complications rate, may also permit a better view of structures to preserve nerves, vessels of parathyroid glands and parathyroid glands when operating. Other benefits include significantly lower blood loss, efficient hemostasis and sectioning in a single instrument.","PeriodicalId":502404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","volume":"131 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The basic principles of high-efficient and safe thyroid surgery were established by 1920: identification and ligation of vessels, identification and preservation of laryngeal nerves, and parathyroid glands. Bleeding remains one of the major intraoperative complications of thyroid surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits of the Harmonic when compared with bipolar coagulation for open thyroidectomy. Materials and methods: We enrolled 85 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for multinodular disease from 2019 till 2022 years. Patients were randomly assigned to either the group 1 (43 patients in which the operation was performed entirely using the Harmonic scalpel (HS) and no other haemostatic tool) or the group 2 (42 patients in which the operation was performed using classic technique of resorbable ligature, bipolar coagulation). The inclusion criteria were scheduled total thyroidectomy for multinodular goiter. Results. There were no significant differences between two groups regarding age, gender, ASA distribution, so two groups are comparable. The mean operating time in the group 1 was 62.84±0.66 (M±m) minutes, and that in the group 2 was 75.19±0.42 (M±m) minutes for thyroidectomy, and there was 19.65% (i.e. 12.35 minutes) statistically significant reduction in the operating time using the Harmonic scalpel device (p<0.05). The 48 hours mean total amount of drainage was 69.05±0.88 (M±m) ml for group 1 and 81.40±0.64 (M±m) ml for group 2, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The rate of postoperative complications was comparable among the two groups (pχ2>0,05). Conclusions. The use of Harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery is safe and effective and is associated with a significant reduction in operative time without increasing complications rate, may also permit a better view of structures to preserve nerves, vessels of parathyroid glands and parathyroid glands when operating. Other benefits include significantly lower blood loss, efficient hemostasis and sectioning in a single instrument.
谐波手术刀与双极电凝法在甲状腺切除术中的比较
简介高效安全的甲状腺手术的基本原则早在1920年就已确立:识别和结扎血管、识别和保留喉神经以及甲状旁腺。出血仍是甲状腺手术的主要术中并发症之一。 本研究旨在评估在开放式甲状腺切除术中使用 Harmonic 与双极电凝相比的优势。 材料和方法:我们从2019年至2022年期间招募了85名因多结节病接受甲状腺全切除术的患者。患者被随机分配到第一组(43 名患者完全使用谐波手术刀(HS)进行手术,不使用其他止血工具)或第二组(42 名患者使用经典的可吸收结扎技术、双极凝固技术进行手术)。纳入标准为多结节性甲状腺肿的全甲状腺切除术。 结果两组患者在年龄、性别、ASA分布等方面无明显差异,具有可比性。第1组甲状腺切除术的平均手术时间为62.84±0.66(M±m)分钟,第2组为75.19±0.42(M±m)分钟,使用Harmonic手术刀装置后,手术时间减少了19.65%(即12.35分钟),差异有统计学意义(P0,05)。 结论在甲状腺手术中使用Harmonic手术刀安全有效,能显著缩短手术时间,且不会增加并发症发生率,还能在手术时更好地观察结构,保护神经、甲状旁腺血管和甲状旁腺。其他优点还包括失血量明显降低、止血效率高以及只需一个器械即可进行切片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信