Need for external replication trials in homeopathic basic research: presenting research on three duckweed test systems as an example

Annekathrin Ücker
{"title":"Need for external replication trials in homeopathic basic research: presenting research on three duckweed test systems as an example","authors":"Annekathrin Ücker","doi":"10.51910/ijhdr.v22i2.1354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main aims in homeopathic basic research is to find reliable test systems that are externally replicable. In face of the replication crisis in research in general and the specificities that are necessary to include in homeopathic basic research, it is of great importance to encourage high-quality replication trials. One way to achieve that is to build up a register or a data base for test systems in homeopathic basic research that are already developed to the point that external replication trials are possible. Such a register offers the opportunity to include not just the published information but also helpful insight such as material lists and time frames for easier planning and conduction of replication trials. Additionally, further information on critical environmental parameter, unpublished negative results, etc. could be included. The general frame work of such a register/ data base is demonstrated with the example of three different duckweed test systems developed in our working group since 2001. The growth rate of duckweed (Lemna gibba L., clone number 9352) was investigated in randomised and blinded settings, using either untreated plants or plants pre-treated with a stressor (arsenic solution or calcium deficiency in the growth medium). Within the original trials, potentised substances in the range of 14x-33x were compared to water control groups (succussed and unsuccussed water). The  stability of the test systems was investigated in parallel systematic negative control (SNC) experiments. All original trials revealed a significant influence of some potencies on the growth rate of duckweed and stable test systems as shown with SNC experiments. Four internal replication trials for two of the three test systems were conducted. The replication trials showed effects of homeopathic preparations with some differences in effect size and effect direction compared to original studies.","PeriodicalId":106057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206","volume":"180 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51910/ijhdr.v22i2.1354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main aims in homeopathic basic research is to find reliable test systems that are externally replicable. In face of the replication crisis in research in general and the specificities that are necessary to include in homeopathic basic research, it is of great importance to encourage high-quality replication trials. One way to achieve that is to build up a register or a data base for test systems in homeopathic basic research that are already developed to the point that external replication trials are possible. Such a register offers the opportunity to include not just the published information but also helpful insight such as material lists and time frames for easier planning and conduction of replication trials. Additionally, further information on critical environmental parameter, unpublished negative results, etc. could be included. The general frame work of such a register/ data base is demonstrated with the example of three different duckweed test systems developed in our working group since 2001. The growth rate of duckweed (Lemna gibba L., clone number 9352) was investigated in randomised and blinded settings, using either untreated plants or plants pre-treated with a stressor (arsenic solution or calcium deficiency in the growth medium). Within the original trials, potentised substances in the range of 14x-33x were compared to water control groups (succussed and unsuccussed water). The  stability of the test systems was investigated in parallel systematic negative control (SNC) experiments. All original trials revealed a significant influence of some potencies on the growth rate of duckweed and stable test systems as shown with SNC experiments. Four internal replication trials for two of the three test systems were conducted. The replication trials showed effects of homeopathic preparations with some differences in effect size and effect direction compared to original studies.
顺势疗法基础研究中外部复制试验的必要性:以三个浮萍试验系统的研究为例
顺势疗法基础研究的主要目标之一是找到可从外部复制的可靠测试系统。面对一般研究中的复制危机和顺势疗法基础研究中必须包括的特殊性,鼓励高质量的复制试验至关重要。实现这一目标的方法之一,就是为顺势疗法基础研究中已经发展到可以进行外部复制试验的测试系统建立一个登记册或数据库。这样的登记册不仅可以提供已公布的信息,还可以提供有用的信息,如材料清单和时间框架,以便于规划和进行复制试验。此外,还可以包括有关关键环境参数、未公布的负面结果等进一步信息。 以我们工作组自 2001 年以来开发的三种不同的浮萍试验系统为例,说明了此类登记簿/数据库的总体框架。浮萍(Lemna gibba L.,克隆编号 9352)的生长率是在随机和盲测的情况下,使用未经处理的植物或预先用应激源(砷溶液或生长介质中缺钙)处理过的植物进行调查的。在最初的试验中,14x-33x 的强效物质与水对照组(琥珀水和未琥珀水)进行了比较。同时还进行了系统阴性对照(SNC)试验,以研究试验系统的稳定性。所有原始试验都表明,某些药效对浮萍的生长率有明显影响,SNC 试验也表明试验系统是稳定的。对三种测试系统中的两种进行了四次内部复制试验。复制试验显示了顺势疗法制剂的效果,但与原始研究相比,在效果大小和效果方向上存在一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信