The Life after Life of the 2006 Transnistrian Sovereignty Referendum

Marcin Kosienkowski
{"title":"The Life after Life of the 2006 Transnistrian Sovereignty Referendum","authors":"Marcin Kosienkowski","doi":"10.1017/nps.2023.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2006, the authorities of the de facto state of Transnistria unilaterally held a sovereignty referendum. Almost all voters supported Transnistria gaining internationally recognized independence and subsequently integrating/associating with Russia. Despite such clear results, the poll was not recognized internationally and, consequently, not implemented. However, this was not a problem for the Transnistrian leadership, since the primary objective of the referendum was not to reallocate sovereignty, but to domestically empower Transnistria’s President Igor Smirnov. Based on the discourse of Transnistria’s next president, Yevgeniy Shevchuk, this article argues that the referendum was not placed in the dustbin of history. Analysis of the official Transnistrian news published during his presidency from 2011–2016 shows that Shevchuk re-exploited the 2006 sovereignty referendum. His aim was not to reallocate sovereignty either, but to reach the following goals: 1. procure legitimacy of the Transnistrian sovereignty cause internationally; 2. empower Transnistria vis-à-vis its parent state, Moldova; 3. boost relations with Transnistria’s patron, Russia; and 4. empower himself domestically. Arguably, the argument about the strategic use of past unilateral sovereignty referendums also works in cases of other de facto states, which can be analyzed using the analytical framework presented in this article.","PeriodicalId":508038,"journal":{"name":"Nationalities Papers","volume":"9 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nationalities Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2023.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2006, the authorities of the de facto state of Transnistria unilaterally held a sovereignty referendum. Almost all voters supported Transnistria gaining internationally recognized independence and subsequently integrating/associating with Russia. Despite such clear results, the poll was not recognized internationally and, consequently, not implemented. However, this was not a problem for the Transnistrian leadership, since the primary objective of the referendum was not to reallocate sovereignty, but to domestically empower Transnistria’s President Igor Smirnov. Based on the discourse of Transnistria’s next president, Yevgeniy Shevchuk, this article argues that the referendum was not placed in the dustbin of history. Analysis of the official Transnistrian news published during his presidency from 2011–2016 shows that Shevchuk re-exploited the 2006 sovereignty referendum. His aim was not to reallocate sovereignty either, but to reach the following goals: 1. procure legitimacy of the Transnistrian sovereignty cause internationally; 2. empower Transnistria vis-à-vis its parent state, Moldova; 3. boost relations with Transnistria’s patron, Russia; and 4. empower himself domestically. Arguably, the argument about the strategic use of past unilateral sovereignty referendums also works in cases of other de facto states, which can be analyzed using the analytical framework presented in this article.
2006 年德涅斯特河左岸主权公投后的生活
2006 年,德涅斯特河左岸事实国家当局单方面举行了主权公投。几乎所有选民都支持德涅斯特河左岸获得国际公认的独立,并随后与俄罗斯合并/联合。尽管投票结果如此明确,但却未得到国际承认,因此也未付诸实施。然而,这对德涅斯特河左岸领导人来说并不是问题,因为公投的主要目的不是重新分配主权,而是在国内赋予德涅斯特河左岸总统伊戈尔-斯米尔诺夫权力。本文根据德涅斯特河左岸下一任总统叶夫根尼-谢夫丘克(Yevgeniy Shevchuk)的论述,认为公投并没有被丢进历史的垃圾桶。对谢夫丘克在2011-2016年担任总统期间发布的德涅斯特河左岸官方新闻的分析表明,谢夫丘克重新利用了2006年的主权公投。他的目的也不是重新分配主权,而是为了实现以下目标:1.在国际上为德涅斯特河左岸的主权事业争取合法性;2.增强德涅斯特河左岸相对于其母国摩尔多瓦的实力;3.促进与德涅斯特河左岸的赞助国俄罗斯的关系;4.增强自己在国内的实力。可以说,关于过去单方面主权公投的战略用途的论点也适用于其他事实上的国家,可以使用本文提出的分析框架对其进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信