The problematisation of Romantic genius in Peter Ackroyd’s The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein

Deniz Ayyildiz
{"title":"The problematisation of Romantic genius in Peter Ackroyd’s The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein","authors":"Deniz Ayyildiz","doi":"10.29000/rumelide.1406005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peter Ackroyd’s novel The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein, as a postmodern intertextual novel, reimagines and rewrites Mary Shelley’s seminal novel Frankenstein: or, The Modern Prometheus, by putting its titular character in the historical conditions in which Mary Shelley composed her narrative. It is proposed in the study that in Ackroyd’s novel, Victor Frankenstein is imagined as a Romantic genius figure who is inspired by the Romantic poets of the early 19th century Britain. This study aims to show how Ackroyd’s portrayal of Victor Frankenstein as a Romantic artist problematises the very concept of Romantic genius by exposing the shortcomings of genius figures and their lack of self-perception. The concept of genius is discussed by referencing to the Romantic tradition in the British literature and it is inspected how Ackroyd’s postmodern novel decentralises the genius figures, by depicting them as productions of a class-conscious society. It is discussed that these historical figures are socially constructed figures who, behind all their idolisations, are fallible human beings. The discussion is expanded by examining the postmodern inclinations of the text which recontextualises the Frankenstein myth. This article questions whether a historical narrative can be considered as valid in a postmodern era in which meaning perpetually multiplies.","PeriodicalId":509346,"journal":{"name":"RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1406005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peter Ackroyd’s novel The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein, as a postmodern intertextual novel, reimagines and rewrites Mary Shelley’s seminal novel Frankenstein: or, The Modern Prometheus, by putting its titular character in the historical conditions in which Mary Shelley composed her narrative. It is proposed in the study that in Ackroyd’s novel, Victor Frankenstein is imagined as a Romantic genius figure who is inspired by the Romantic poets of the early 19th century Britain. This study aims to show how Ackroyd’s portrayal of Victor Frankenstein as a Romantic artist problematises the very concept of Romantic genius by exposing the shortcomings of genius figures and their lack of self-perception. The concept of genius is discussed by referencing to the Romantic tradition in the British literature and it is inspected how Ackroyd’s postmodern novel decentralises the genius figures, by depicting them as productions of a class-conscious society. It is discussed that these historical figures are socially constructed figures who, behind all their idolisations, are fallible human beings. The discussion is expanded by examining the postmodern inclinations of the text which recontextualises the Frankenstein myth. This article questions whether a historical narrative can be considered as valid in a postmodern era in which meaning perpetually multiplies.
彼得-阿克罗伊德的《弗兰肯斯坦案例集》中浪漫主义天才的问题化
彼得-阿克罗伊德(Peter Ackroyd)的小说《维克多-弗兰肯斯坦案例集》作为一部后现代互文小说,通过将小说中的人物置于玛丽-雪莱创作时的历史条件下,重新想象和改写了玛丽-雪莱的开创性小说《弗兰肯斯坦:或现代普罗米修斯》。本研究提出,在阿克罗伊德的小说中,维克多-弗兰肯斯坦被想象成一个浪漫主义天才人物,他受到 19 世纪初英国浪漫主义诗人的启发。本研究旨在说明阿克罗伊德如何将维克多-弗兰肯斯坦描绘成一位浪漫主义艺术家,通过揭露天才人物的缺点及其缺乏自我认知的情况,对浪漫主义天才的概念本身提出质疑。通过参考英国文学中的浪漫主义传统,讨论了天才的概念,并探讨了阿克罗伊德的后现代小说是如何通过将天才人物描绘成具有阶级意识的社会的产物来分散天才人物的。讨论认为,这些历史人物都是社会塑造的人物,在他们所有的偶像崇拜背后,他们都是容易犯错的人。文章还探讨了文本的后现代倾向,对弗兰肯斯坦神话进行了重新语境化。本文质疑的是,在意义不断多重化的后现代时代,历史叙事是否可以被视为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信