Interconnection Between Ecosystem Services and Local Communities: Knowledge Gap Identification in the Area of Kakamega Forest

I. Osewe, E.O. Osewe, B. Popa
{"title":"Interconnection Between Ecosystem Services and Local Communities: Knowledge Gap Identification in the Area of Kakamega Forest","authors":"I. Osewe, E.O. Osewe, B. Popa","doi":"10.31926/but.fwiafe.2023.16.65.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential for accelerate loss of ecosystem services exists when the livelihood of the rural poor is heavily reliant on local ecosystems. For an improvement in livelihood of the rural poor there is need for assessment of key elements of the livelihood framework. This is especially important to Kakamega forest, the last remaining tropical rainforest in Kenya. This paper is a comprehensive literature review aimed at identifyed the research gaps in the area of the relationships between local communities and Kakamega forest ecosystem services. We derived the 42 case studies using ROSES framework and used descriptive statistics to analysis the data set. 93% of the case studies analyse provisional ecosystem, 83% cultural, 55% regulating and 31% supporting ecosystem. We identified r research gaps in our interest area. Most used research methodology is the participatory rural methods which involved interviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussion. The identified research gaps will enable us to develop tools that can be used to assess the livelihood improvement of local forest communities in Kakamega. The comprehensive review is also useful for planning the research in other parts of Kenya and beyond, in order to improve livelihoods of local forest communities.","PeriodicalId":505399,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series II: Forestry • Wood Industry • Agricultural Food Engineering","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series II: Forestry • Wood Industry • Agricultural Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2023.16.65.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential for accelerate loss of ecosystem services exists when the livelihood of the rural poor is heavily reliant on local ecosystems. For an improvement in livelihood of the rural poor there is need for assessment of key elements of the livelihood framework. This is especially important to Kakamega forest, the last remaining tropical rainforest in Kenya. This paper is a comprehensive literature review aimed at identifyed the research gaps in the area of the relationships between local communities and Kakamega forest ecosystem services. We derived the 42 case studies using ROSES framework and used descriptive statistics to analysis the data set. 93% of the case studies analyse provisional ecosystem, 83% cultural, 55% regulating and 31% supporting ecosystem. We identified r research gaps in our interest area. Most used research methodology is the participatory rural methods which involved interviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussion. The identified research gaps will enable us to develop tools that can be used to assess the livelihood improvement of local forest communities in Kakamega. The comprehensive review is also useful for planning the research in other parts of Kenya and beyond, in order to improve livelihoods of local forest communities.
生态系统服务与当地社区之间的相互联系:卡卡梅加森林地区的知识差距识别
当农村贫困人口的生计严重依赖当地生态系统时,生态系统服务就有可能加速流失。为改善农村贫困人口的生计,有必要对生计框架的关键要素进行评估。这对肯尼亚仅存的热带雨林卡卡梅加森林尤为重要。本文是一篇全面的文献综述,旨在确定当地社区与卡卡梅加森林生态系统服务之间关系领域的研究空白。我们使用 ROSES 框架得出了 42 个案例研究,并使用描述性统计对数据集进行了分析。93% 的案例研究分析了临时生态系统,83% 分析了文化生态系统,55% 分析了调节生态系统,31% 分析了支持生态系统。在我们感兴趣的领域中,我们发现了一些研究空白。使用最多的研究方法是农村参与式方法,包括访谈、关键信息提供者访谈和焦点小组讨论。所发现的研究空白将使我们能够开发出可用于评估卡卡梅加当地森林社区生计改善情况的工具。全面审查还有助于规划肯尼亚其他地区和其他地区的研究,以改善当地森林社区的生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信