Study of Maternal Near Miss by Near Miss: Mortality Ratio, Exploring Quality of Care

Shany John, Vandana Patidar, Kalpana Mahadik
{"title":"Study of Maternal Near Miss by Near Miss: Mortality Ratio, Exploring Quality of Care","authors":"Shany John, Vandana Patidar, Kalpana Mahadik","doi":"10.58999/cijmr.v2i03.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Near Miss being a proxy indicator of MMR, evaluation of facility services and Near Missnumbers was carried out in a teaching hospital in Central India. Sustainable Development Goal targetsMMR less than 70 by year 2030. This study aims to report and evaluate causal factors of maternal nearmiss ratio, maternal death ratio as it is a sensitive indicator of medical care given by the facility. Criticalcare services were quantified in this study.Methods: 4422 number of delivery files occurring over a period of 3 years were included in aretrospective manner. Maternal deaths were 21, Near Miss 170 and live births 4237. Variables studiedwere Maternal near miss ratio, Maternal near miss mortality ratio, mortality index and final diagnosisof each patient. The number of blood components, urgent surgery, ventilator, ICU stay, dialysis andnumber of fourth-generation antibiotics were studied for calculating risk factors against variousdiagnoses. Bi-variate analysis and percents were statistical tools used.Results: Maternal near miss ratio was 40.12, the maternal near miss mortality ratio 8.09:1, and mortalityindex 10.99%. The findings included 85.3% blood transfusion use, 61.8% surgical intervention, 38.2%inotrope, 32.4% ventilator, 96% ICU and 96% fourth generation antibiotic use. Odds for comparisonof services given for various different etiological conditions with respect to MNM ratio and MNMMortalityratio was statistically significant for our data; giving a positive and better ranking to servicesin this Institute.Conclusion: The maternal near-miss ratio of 40.12, Mortality index of 10.99% and MNM – Mortalityratio 8:1 are the major findings of this study.Odds for comparative statements between other reportsand others showed statistical significance.","PeriodicalId":127536,"journal":{"name":"Central India Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central India Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58999/cijmr.v2i03.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Near Miss being a proxy indicator of MMR, evaluation of facility services and Near Missnumbers was carried out in a teaching hospital in Central India. Sustainable Development Goal targetsMMR less than 70 by year 2030. This study aims to report and evaluate causal factors of maternal nearmiss ratio, maternal death ratio as it is a sensitive indicator of medical care given by the facility. Criticalcare services were quantified in this study.Methods: 4422 number of delivery files occurring over a period of 3 years were included in aretrospective manner. Maternal deaths were 21, Near Miss 170 and live births 4237. Variables studiedwere Maternal near miss ratio, Maternal near miss mortality ratio, mortality index and final diagnosisof each patient. The number of blood components, urgent surgery, ventilator, ICU stay, dialysis andnumber of fourth-generation antibiotics were studied for calculating risk factors against variousdiagnoses. Bi-variate analysis and percents were statistical tools used.Results: Maternal near miss ratio was 40.12, the maternal near miss mortality ratio 8.09:1, and mortalityindex 10.99%. The findings included 85.3% blood transfusion use, 61.8% surgical intervention, 38.2%inotrope, 32.4% ventilator, 96% ICU and 96% fourth generation antibiotic use. Odds for comparisonof services given for various different etiological conditions with respect to MNM ratio and MNMMortalityratio was statistically significant for our data; giving a positive and better ranking to servicesin this Institute.Conclusion: The maternal near-miss ratio of 40.12, Mortality index of 10.99% and MNM – Mortalityratio 8:1 are the major findings of this study.Odds for comparative statements between other reportsand others showed statistical significance.
按 "险情 "研究孕产妇险情:死亡率,探讨护理质量
导言:近乎失误是 MMR 的替代指标,在印度中部的一家教学医院对设施服务和近乎失误数字进行了评估。可持续发展目标要求到 2030 年产妇死亡率低于 70%。本研究旨在报告和评估孕产妇失误率和孕产妇死亡率的成因,因为这是衡量医疗机构所提供医疗服务的敏感指标。本研究对危重症护理服务进行了量化。方法:以回顾性方式纳入了 3 年内发生的 4422 份分娩档案。产妇死亡 21 例,险些死亡 170 例,活产 4237 例。研究变量包括孕产妇险些死亡比率、孕产妇险些死亡比率、死亡指数和每位患者的最终诊断。为计算各种诊断的风险因素,还研究了血液成分、紧急手术、呼吸机、重症监护室住院、透析和第四代抗生素的数量。统计工具包括双变量分析和百分比:产妇险些失救率为 40.12,产妇险些失救死亡率为 8.09:1,死亡率指数为 10.99%。调查结果显示,输血使用率为 85.3%,外科手术使用率为 61.8%,肌注使用率为 38.2%,呼吸机使用率为 32.4%,重症监护室使用率为 96%,第四代抗生素使用率为 96%。就我们的数据而言,针对各种不同病因所提供的服务与产妇死亡率和新生儿死亡率的比较具有显著的统计学意义,从而为该研究所的服务提供了积极和更好的排名:本研究的主要发现是孕产妇近失能率为 40.12,死亡率指数为 10.99%,MNM-Mortalityratio 为 8:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信