Politics of “waiting for transformation” in protracted urban renewal projects in Turkey

Deniz Ay, Mehmet Penpecioğlu
{"title":"Politics of “waiting for transformation” in protracted urban renewal projects in Turkey","authors":"Deniz Ay, Mehmet Penpecioğlu","doi":"10.1177/23996544231222138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the politics of ‘waiting’ as a mode of governance in large-scale urban redevelopment projects. In designated renewal areas, residents/landowners are often subject to several episodes of waiting: waiting for the public authority for information on redevelopment visions; waiting for the plans and projects to become public; waiting for the court ruling if they appeal the plans; waiting for demolition upon plan approvals; and, finally, waiting for the constructions to be completed. Given the complexity of actors and institutions involved in the waiting, it becomes a conflictual political process. This prolonged waiting leads to an ongoing temporariness and precarious spaces of urban renewal. The course of waiting affects the reorganization of the city space “ now” and in the future. We analyze two protracted urban renewal projects from Turkey, Fikirtepe in Istanbul and Karabaglar in Izmir, to explore how residents’ decade-long waiting for urban change are shaped and how these diverse waiting experiences lead to different outcomes for the progression of the state-imposed urban renewal agendas. While Karabaglar residents have unified around active bottom-up resistance from the beginning to challenge the project-based plans the central government imposed, Fikirtepe residents pursued individual-level negotiations with developers to maximize private returns following the zoning incentives the public authority gave. Despite the socio-spatial similarities between these designated urban renewal project sites, variances in residents’ collective waiting strategies have led to different urban politics around project-based urban change.","PeriodicalId":507957,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544231222138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the politics of ‘waiting’ as a mode of governance in large-scale urban redevelopment projects. In designated renewal areas, residents/landowners are often subject to several episodes of waiting: waiting for the public authority for information on redevelopment visions; waiting for the plans and projects to become public; waiting for the court ruling if they appeal the plans; waiting for demolition upon plan approvals; and, finally, waiting for the constructions to be completed. Given the complexity of actors and institutions involved in the waiting, it becomes a conflictual political process. This prolonged waiting leads to an ongoing temporariness and precarious spaces of urban renewal. The course of waiting affects the reorganization of the city space “ now” and in the future. We analyze two protracted urban renewal projects from Turkey, Fikirtepe in Istanbul and Karabaglar in Izmir, to explore how residents’ decade-long waiting for urban change are shaped and how these diverse waiting experiences lead to different outcomes for the progression of the state-imposed urban renewal agendas. While Karabaglar residents have unified around active bottom-up resistance from the beginning to challenge the project-based plans the central government imposed, Fikirtepe residents pursued individual-level negotiations with developers to maximize private returns following the zoning incentives the public authority gave. Despite the socio-spatial similarities between these designated urban renewal project sites, variances in residents’ collective waiting strategies have led to different urban politics around project-based urban change.
土耳其旷日持久的城市改造项目中的 "等待改造 "政治
本文探讨了 "等待 "政治作为大规模城市重建项目中的一种治理模式。在指定的重建区,居民/土地所有者往往要经历数次等待:等待公共权力机构提供有关重建愿景的信息;等待计划和项目的公开;等待法庭裁决(如果他们对计划提出上诉);等待计划批准后的拆迁;最后,等待建设完成。鉴于参与等待的行为者和机构的复杂性,等待成为了一个充满冲突的政治过程。这种漫长的等待导致了持续的暂时性和不稳定的城市更新空间。等待的过程影响着 "现在 "和未来城市空间的重组。我们分析了土耳其两个旷日持久的城市更新项目--伊斯坦布尔的 Fikirtepe 和伊兹密尔的 Karabaglar,以探讨居民长达十年的城市变革等待是如何形成的,以及这些不同的等待经历是如何导致国家强加的城市更新议程取得不同的进展。卡拉巴格拉尔的居民从一开始就团结在一起,自下而上地积极抵抗,挑战中央政府强加的以项目为基础的计划,而菲基尔特佩的居民则与开发商进行个人层面的谈判,在公共当局给予分区奖励后,最大限度地提高私人收益。尽管这些指定的城市改造项目地点在社会空间上有相似之处,但居民集体等待策略的不同导致了围绕基于项目的城市变革的不同城市政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信