{"title":"CRITICAL INCIDENTS AND PERIOPERATIVE EMERGENCIES: ARE FINAL YEAR RESIDENTS AND ANESTHESIOLOGISTS ARE READY?","authors":"K. Bielka, I. Kuchyn, A. Pohorielova, S. Soliaryk","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.4(105).2023.295025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A critical incident (CI) is any failed event that could have been prevented and carries the risk of undesirable consequences for the patient. The study of critical incidents and physicians' preparedness for their occurrence helps to reduce their consequences, risks of recurrence and improve patient safety. The aim of the study was to investigate how well are graduate residents and anesthesiologists prepare to manage critical incidents (CI) and perioperative emergencies (PE) during anesthesia. Methods and Materials: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Bogomolets National Medical University, the postgraduate department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care. The study was conducted from May 2022 to June 2023. Anesthesiologists and final year residents were assessed for the acquired competencies in the management of CI and PE: they conducted a self-assessment of their own competencies; passed 1 simulation scenario with an assessment on the CEХ scale during the scenario. Results. The study included 60 final year residents and 24 anesthesiologists. Many of residents (55 %) and anesthesiologists (63 %) generally assessed their readiness to manage CI and PE as high: 45% and 47% respectively considered their level of readiness to be insufficient, including 27% and 8% who assessed it as low. When stratified by the type of CI and PE, it was found that residents and anesthesiologists were best prepared to provide care in case of CI and PE from the side of breathing and airway patency cardiovascular system. Significantly worse anesthesiologists assessed their readiness for rare emergencies, such as malignant hyperthermia, anaphylaxis, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) (OR 0.35 [0.17- 0.74], p=0.009 for residents and OR 0.25 [0.07-0.8], p=0, 04 for anesthesiologists) and events related to apparatus malfunction, lack of power supply, and catching fire in the respiratory circuit (OR 0.4 [0.2-0.8], p=0.03 for residents and OR 0.25 [0.07-0.8], p=0.04 for anesthesiologists). Anesthesiologists had a significantly higher level of readiness and competence for all individual parameters and the overall mean score during simulation scenarios (7.69±0.53 vs. 5.94±1.6, p<0.0001). Conclusions. Anesthesiologists generally showed higher results in readiness to manage CI and PE during anesthesia. Difficult competencies for both residents and anesthesiologists were the resource management, organizational competencies, and stress resistance.","PeriodicalId":306479,"journal":{"name":"PAIN, ANAESTHESIA & INTENSIVE CARE","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN, ANAESTHESIA & INTENSIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.4(105).2023.295025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A critical incident (CI) is any failed event that could have been prevented and carries the risk of undesirable consequences for the patient. The study of critical incidents and physicians' preparedness for their occurrence helps to reduce their consequences, risks of recurrence and improve patient safety. The aim of the study was to investigate how well are graduate residents and anesthesiologists prepare to manage critical incidents (CI) and perioperative emergencies (PE) during anesthesia. Methods and Materials: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Bogomolets National Medical University, the postgraduate department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care. The study was conducted from May 2022 to June 2023. Anesthesiologists and final year residents were assessed for the acquired competencies in the management of CI and PE: they conducted a self-assessment of their own competencies; passed 1 simulation scenario with an assessment on the CEХ scale during the scenario. Results. The study included 60 final year residents and 24 anesthesiologists. Many of residents (55 %) and anesthesiologists (63 %) generally assessed their readiness to manage CI and PE as high: 45% and 47% respectively considered their level of readiness to be insufficient, including 27% and 8% who assessed it as low. When stratified by the type of CI and PE, it was found that residents and anesthesiologists were best prepared to provide care in case of CI and PE from the side of breathing and airway patency cardiovascular system. Significantly worse anesthesiologists assessed their readiness for rare emergencies, such as malignant hyperthermia, anaphylaxis, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) (OR 0.35 [0.17- 0.74], p=0.009 for residents and OR 0.25 [0.07-0.8], p=0, 04 for anesthesiologists) and events related to apparatus malfunction, lack of power supply, and catching fire in the respiratory circuit (OR 0.4 [0.2-0.8], p=0.03 for residents and OR 0.25 [0.07-0.8], p=0.04 for anesthesiologists). Anesthesiologists had a significantly higher level of readiness and competence for all individual parameters and the overall mean score during simulation scenarios (7.69±0.53 vs. 5.94±1.6, p<0.0001). Conclusions. Anesthesiologists generally showed higher results in readiness to manage CI and PE during anesthesia. Difficult competencies for both residents and anesthesiologists were the resource management, organizational competencies, and stress resistance.
危急事件(CI)是指任何本可避免的失败事件,有可能给患者带来不良后果。研究危急事件和医生对其发生的准备情况有助于减少其后果和再次发生的风险,并提高患者安全。本研究旨在调查毕业住院医师和麻醉医师在麻醉过程中处理危急事件(CI)和围术期紧急情况(PE)的准备情况。方法和材料:在国立波戈莫列茨医科大学外科、麻醉学和重症监护研究生部开展了一项前瞻性观察研究。研究时间为 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 6 月。对麻醉医师和毕业班住院医师在处理 CI 和 PE 方面的能力进行了评估:他们对自己的能力进行了自我评估;通过了 1 个模拟情景,并在情景中使用 CEХ 量表进行了评估。研究结果研究对象包括 60 名毕业班住院医师和 24 名麻醉医师。许多住院医师(55%)和麻醉医师(63%)普遍认为自己在处理 CI 和 PE 方面的准备程度较高:分别有 45% 和 47% 的人认为自己的准备程度不足,其中分别有 27% 和 8% 的人认为自己的准备程度较低。根据 CI 和 PE 的类型进行分层后发现,住院医师和麻醉医师在发生 CI 和 PE 时从呼吸和气道通畅心血管系统方面提供护理的准备最充分。麻醉医师对恶性高热、过敏性休克、局麻药全身毒性(LAST)等罕见紧急情况的准备程度评估明显较差(住院医师的 OR 为 0.35 [0.17-0.74],P=0.009;麻醉医师的 OR 为 0.25 [0.07-0.8],P=0.04)。8],p=0,04),以及与仪器故障、供电不足和呼吸回路起火有关的事件(住院医生 OR 0.4 [0.2-0.8],p=0.03,麻醉医生 OR 0.25 [0.07-0.8],p=0.04)。在模拟情景中,麻醉医师在所有单项参数和总平均分方面的准备和能力水平明显更高(7.69±0.53 vs. 5.94±1.6,p<0.0001)。结论是麻醉医师在麻醉过程中处理 CI 和 PE 的准备程度方面普遍表现较高。住院医师和麻醉医师在资源管理、组织能力和抗压能力方面都存在困难。