European Vector of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s PHilosophy: Resonance of Media Transformations in XVIII century

Mariia Kultaieva
{"title":"European Vector of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s PHilosophy: Resonance of Media Transformations in XVIII century","authors":"Mariia Kultaieva","doi":"10.15407/fd2023.04.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proposes the consideration of Skovoroda’s philosophical heritage in the complex contexts of the European philosophical thought in its historical dimension. This complexity was caused through the secular tendency of the Enlightenment ideology with its explanation patterns for human being and social life. The mediological method developed of R. Debray and A. Koschorke is used for analyzing of Skovoroda’s attitudes towards the Enlightenment innovations in cultural and political life. The contemporary narratives of the First, the Second and the Third Enlightenment are applied as pattern for explanation of Skovoroda’s attitude towards the secular trends in the culture and education caused of the Enlightenment ideology. Skovoroda is balancing on the edge of the First and Second Enlightenment: as a philosopher of freedom he makes human responsible for his way of life, but as philosopher of morality he defended the idea of God using the neo-platonic approach. The resurrection of Epicureanism in the Age of Enlightenment was a theoretical challenge for Skovoroda with resonance reactions because his ethical views were based on Epicurus concept of necessity as regulative principle for successful life which can be got without any effort. The religious anthropology developed of Skovoroda is considering in its anthropological-technical aspect. The central ideas of the First Enlightenment — omnipotence of education, disenchanting of religion and project of a new human are rethinking by Skovoroda from the perspective of his religious anthropology with imperatives of self-knowing and making distinction between visual and invisible thereby the way to the eternal truth is possible only possible by the new hermeneutic of the Bible. The semantics and heuristic metaphors in Skovoroda’s works are analyzed, which have a resonance effect with Protestantism and Freema sons ideas, some of which are actualized today.","PeriodicalId":315902,"journal":{"name":"Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought)","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2023.04.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article proposes the consideration of Skovoroda’s philosophical heritage in the complex contexts of the European philosophical thought in its historical dimension. This complexity was caused through the secular tendency of the Enlightenment ideology with its explanation patterns for human being and social life. The mediological method developed of R. Debray and A. Koschorke is used for analyzing of Skovoroda’s attitudes towards the Enlightenment innovations in cultural and political life. The contemporary narratives of the First, the Second and the Third Enlightenment are applied as pattern for explanation of Skovoroda’s attitude towards the secular trends in the culture and education caused of the Enlightenment ideology. Skovoroda is balancing on the edge of the First and Second Enlightenment: as a philosopher of freedom he makes human responsible for his way of life, but as philosopher of morality he defended the idea of God using the neo-platonic approach. The resurrection of Epicureanism in the Age of Enlightenment was a theoretical challenge for Skovoroda with resonance reactions because his ethical views were based on Epicurus concept of necessity as regulative principle for successful life which can be got without any effort. The religious anthropology developed of Skovoroda is considering in its anthropological-technical aspect. The central ideas of the First Enlightenment — omnipotence of education, disenchanting of religion and project of a new human are rethinking by Skovoroda from the perspective of his religious anthropology with imperatives of self-knowing and making distinction between visual and invisible thereby the way to the eternal truth is possible only possible by the new hermeneutic of the Bible. The semantics and heuristic metaphors in Skovoroda’s works are analyzed, which have a resonance effect with Protestantism and Freema sons ideas, some of which are actualized today.
赫里霍里-斯科沃罗达哲学的欧洲载体:十八世纪媒体变革的共振
文章建议从欧洲哲学思想的历史维度,在复杂的背景下思考斯科沃罗达的哲学遗产。这种复杂性是由启蒙运动意识形态的世俗化倾向及其对人类和社会生活的解释模式造成的。R. Debray 和 A. Koschorke 开发的中介学方法被用于分析斯科沃罗达对启蒙运动在文化和政治生活中的创新所持的态度。第一次、第二次和第三次启蒙运动的当代叙事被用作解释斯科沃罗达对启蒙运动意识形态导致的文化和教育世俗化趋势的态度的模式。斯科沃罗达处于第一次和第二次启蒙运动的边缘:作为自由哲学家,他让人类为自己的生活方式负责,但作为道德哲学家,他又用新柏拉图主义的方法捍卫上帝的观念。伊壁鸠鲁主义在启蒙时代的复活对斯科沃罗达来说是一个理论挑战,因为他的伦理观是建立在伊壁鸠鲁 "必然性 "概念的基础上的,"必然性 "是不费吹灰之力就能获得成功生活的指导原则。斯科沃罗达发展的宗教人类学从人类学和技术的角度进行了思考。斯科沃罗达从其宗教人类学的角度重新思考了第一次启蒙运动的中心思想--教育的万能、宗教的失魅和新人类计划,并提出了自我认识和区分视觉与非视觉的要求,从而只有通过新的《圣经》诠释学才能找到通往永恒真理的道路。对斯科沃罗达作品中的语义学和启发式隐喻进行了分析,这些隐喻与新教和弗雷马之子的思想产生了共鸣,其中一些思想在今天得到了实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信