Perceptions of evidence-based practice among Vietnamese psychology students

My-Tien Nguyen-Thi, Vu Hoang Anh Nguyen, Huyen-Trang Luu-Thi, V. Tran-Chi
{"title":"Perceptions of evidence-based practice among Vietnamese psychology students","authors":"My-Tien Nguyen-Thi, Vu Hoang Anh Nguyen, Huyen-Trang Luu-Thi, V. Tran-Chi","doi":"10.55493/5003.v13i4.4942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) improves public health and makes it easier for psychologists to do their jobs well by using case formulation, intervention, and therapeutic relationship principles that have been shown to work in the real world. The utilization of evidence-based practice in the field of psychology has been widely regarded as the most effective approach for researchers and practitioners to incorporate current data into their therapeutic practice and decision-making processes. The objective of this study was to investigate attitudes towards EBPP and assess the level of exposure to evidence-based practice and evidence-based therapies in the corresponding training program among students. A cohort of 250 undergraduate students pursuing a degree in psychology were enlisted to participate in the survey. The research employed quantitative methodologies, specifically one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis, to examine and interpret the collected data. The favorable influence of students' judgments of the sufficiency of training in different components of clinical expertise and exposure to evidence-based practice (EBP) and evidence-based treatments (EBTs) in their respective training program can be observed in students' experiences and attitudes towards EBP in psychology. The findings derived from the present study provide compelling evidence supporting the imperative of implementing educational interventions aimed at enhancing the research knowledge and skills of psychology students, as well as their ability to effectively utilize research in their academic pursuits.","PeriodicalId":506447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Scientific Research","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55493/5003.v13i4.4942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) improves public health and makes it easier for psychologists to do their jobs well by using case formulation, intervention, and therapeutic relationship principles that have been shown to work in the real world. The utilization of evidence-based practice in the field of psychology has been widely regarded as the most effective approach for researchers and practitioners to incorporate current data into their therapeutic practice and decision-making processes. The objective of this study was to investigate attitudes towards EBPP and assess the level of exposure to evidence-based practice and evidence-based therapies in the corresponding training program among students. A cohort of 250 undergraduate students pursuing a degree in psychology were enlisted to participate in the survey. The research employed quantitative methodologies, specifically one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis, to examine and interpret the collected data. The favorable influence of students' judgments of the sufficiency of training in different components of clinical expertise and exposure to evidence-based practice (EBP) and evidence-based treatments (EBTs) in their respective training program can be observed in students' experiences and attitudes towards EBP in psychology. The findings derived from the present study provide compelling evidence supporting the imperative of implementing educational interventions aimed at enhancing the research knowledge and skills of psychology students, as well as their ability to effectively utilize research in their academic pursuits.
越南心理学学生对循证实践的看法
心理学循证实践(EBPP)通过使用在现实世界中行之有效的病例制定、干预和治疗关系原则,提高了公众健康水平,使心理学家更容易做好本职工作。心理学领域的循证实践被广泛认为是研究人员和从业人员将当前数据纳入治疗实践和决策过程的最有效方法。本研究旨在调查学生对 EBPP 的态度,并评估他们在相应培训项目中接触循证实践和循证疗法的程度。250 名攻读心理学学位的本科生参与了调查。研究采用了定量方法,特别是单因子方差分析、皮尔逊相关分析和回归分析,来检验和解释收集到的数据。从学生对心理学循证实践(EBP)的体验和态度中可以观察到,他们对各自培训项目中临床专业知识不同组成部分的培训是否充分以及循证实践(EBP)和循证治疗(EBTs)的接触情况的判断对他们产生了有利的影响。本研究的结果提供了令人信服的证据,证明必须实施教育干预措施,以提高心理学学生的研究知识和技能,以及他们在学术追求中有效利用研究的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信