Roles of journalists in media literacy initiatives: trainees and trainers. Continuity, collaboration, and sustainability of media literacy trainings to mitigate disinformation in Portugal

C. Foà, Vítor Tomè, Dina Margato, M. Paisana, Miguel Crespo, Gustavo Cardoso
{"title":"Roles of journalists in media literacy initiatives: trainees and trainers. Continuity, collaboration, and sustainability of media literacy trainings to mitigate disinformation in Portugal","authors":"C. Foà, Vítor Tomè, Dina Margato, M. Paisana, Miguel Crespo, Gustavo Cardoso","doi":"10.3145/epi.2023.nov.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to foster the debate on Media Literacy (ML) projects with a focus on disinformation. We analyse initiatives carried out locally in Portugal, considering the principles of ML, the necessary development of skills and competences, as well as the importance of the journalistic action and the consequences of platformization on professional practices. Mixed methods are applied to collect and analyse quali-quantitative data from ML projects and trainings involving multiple stakeholders. Inquiring three independent samples (editors-in-chief, journalists trained in ML, teachers trained by journalists in ML) the research questions address the importance of journalists’ participation in ML within different roles, as well as the training quality and projects’ assessment. Findings show a lack of specialised knowledge, practical tools, and continuous training as well the need for more tailor-made programs and evaluation resources that allow for the creation and promotion of more effective ML training programs. This contribution is therefore two-folded: a) it aims to enhance the operational aspects of media training in the field, based on a continuous improvement logic and b) it explores a specific evaluative example on how the feedback from training can help improve research efforts in the media literacy field. Conclusions systematise the assumptions, stemming from an articulation of ML stakeholders’ perspectives, that guide the implementation, improvement, and assessment of training: collaboration, continuity, and sustainability. These inductive categories allow for the development of theoretical-practical dimensions of the processes for evaluating innovative training against disinformation which may in turn have an inoculation role in the wider public sphere. We suggest improvements to the methodological-operational processes to involve journalists, to do follow-up, assessment, and implementation of wider training projects, contributing to applied research.","PeriodicalId":504184,"journal":{"name":"El Profesional de la información","volume":"55 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El Profesional de la información","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to foster the debate on Media Literacy (ML) projects with a focus on disinformation. We analyse initiatives carried out locally in Portugal, considering the principles of ML, the necessary development of skills and competences, as well as the importance of the journalistic action and the consequences of platformization on professional practices. Mixed methods are applied to collect and analyse quali-quantitative data from ML projects and trainings involving multiple stakeholders. Inquiring three independent samples (editors-in-chief, journalists trained in ML, teachers trained by journalists in ML) the research questions address the importance of journalists’ participation in ML within different roles, as well as the training quality and projects’ assessment. Findings show a lack of specialised knowledge, practical tools, and continuous training as well the need for more tailor-made programs and evaluation resources that allow for the creation and promotion of more effective ML training programs. This contribution is therefore two-folded: a) it aims to enhance the operational aspects of media training in the field, based on a continuous improvement logic and b) it explores a specific evaluative example on how the feedback from training can help improve research efforts in the media literacy field. Conclusions systematise the assumptions, stemming from an articulation of ML stakeholders’ perspectives, that guide the implementation, improvement, and assessment of training: collaboration, continuity, and sustainability. These inductive categories allow for the development of theoretical-practical dimensions of the processes for evaluating innovative training against disinformation which may in turn have an inoculation role in the wider public sphere. We suggest improvements to the methodological-operational processes to involve journalists, to do follow-up, assessment, and implementation of wider training projects, contributing to applied research.
记者在媒体扫盲行动中的作用:受训者和培训者。葡萄牙减少虚假信息的媒体扫盲培训的连续性、协作性和可持续性
本文旨在促进关于媒体扫盲(ML)项目的讨论,重点关注虚假信息。我们分析了葡萄牙当地开展的活动,考虑了媒体扫盲的原则、必要的技能和能力发展,以及新闻行动的重要性和平台化对专业实践的影响。本研究采用混合方法收集和分析多方利益相关者参与的 ML 项目和培训的定性定量数据。通过询问三个独立样本(主编、接受过 ML 培训的记者、接受过记者 ML 培训的教师),研究问题涉及记者在不同角色中参与 ML 的重要性,以及培训质量和项目评估。研究结果表明,记者缺乏专业知识、实用工具和持续培训,需要更多量身定制的计划和评估资源,以创建和推广更有效的媒体语言培训计划。因此,本报告有两方面的贡献:a) 本报告旨在以持续改进的逻辑为基础,加强实地媒体培训的操作性;b) 本报告探讨了一个具体的评估实例,说明培训反馈如何有助于改进媒体扫盲领域的研究工作。结论系统地阐述了指导培训实施、改进和评估的假设,这些假设来自于对媒体扫盲相关方观点的阐述:合作、连续性和可持续性。通过这些归纳性的分类,可以从理论和实践两个方面对针对虚假信息的创新培训进行评估,这反过来又可以在更广泛的公共领域发挥预防作用。我们建议改进方法操作流程,让记者参与进来,对更广泛的培训项目进行跟踪、评估和实施,为应用研究做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信