“Giving the People Who Use the Service a Voice”: Student Experiences of University Disability Services

Beth Witham, Gayle Brewer
{"title":"“Giving the People Who Use the Service a Voice”: Student Experiences of University Disability Services","authors":"Beth Witham, Gayle Brewer","doi":"10.3390/disabilities4010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disabled students are systematically disadvantaged compared to their non-disabled peers and Disability Services can provide important access to accommodations and support. Such services are not, however, without issues. The present study investigates student experiences with University Disability Services in order to identify shared barriers to inclusion and recommendations for practice. Individual semi-structured online interviews were conducted with twelve female students. Each student discussed their engagement with Disability Services as an undergraduate or postgraduate student, and each student disclosed a long-term, nonvisible condition. A thematic analysis was used to identify three themes. These were (1) Identity and Legitimacy (Identification as Disabled, Perceived Legitimacy, The Importance of Evidence), (2) Knowledge and Understanding (Knowledge of Specific Conditions, Knowledge of Disability Services, Disability Services Staff Knowledge and Understanding, Peer Knowledge and Understanding), and (3) Independence and Support (Desire for Autonomy, The Importance of Self-Advocacy, Additional Support). The findings highlight shared barriers to support experienced by students with different diagnoses who engage with University Disability Services. A range of recommendations are provided to improve Disability Services provision (e.g., universities are advised to review the language used to advertise Disability Services).","PeriodicalId":505877,"journal":{"name":"Disabilities","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities4010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disabled students are systematically disadvantaged compared to their non-disabled peers and Disability Services can provide important access to accommodations and support. Such services are not, however, without issues. The present study investigates student experiences with University Disability Services in order to identify shared barriers to inclusion and recommendations for practice. Individual semi-structured online interviews were conducted with twelve female students. Each student discussed their engagement with Disability Services as an undergraduate or postgraduate student, and each student disclosed a long-term, nonvisible condition. A thematic analysis was used to identify three themes. These were (1) Identity and Legitimacy (Identification as Disabled, Perceived Legitimacy, The Importance of Evidence), (2) Knowledge and Understanding (Knowledge of Specific Conditions, Knowledge of Disability Services, Disability Services Staff Knowledge and Understanding, Peer Knowledge and Understanding), and (3) Independence and Support (Desire for Autonomy, The Importance of Self-Advocacy, Additional Support). The findings highlight shared barriers to support experienced by students with different diagnoses who engage with University Disability Services. A range of recommendations are provided to improve Disability Services provision (e.g., universities are advised to review the language used to advertise Disability Services).
"让使用服务的人有发言权":学生对大学残疾人服务的体验
与非残疾学生相比,残疾学生在制度上处于不利地位,残疾服务可以为他们提供重要的便利和支持。然而,这些服务并非没有问题。本研究调查了学生在大学残障服务方面的经历,以确定实现包容的共同障碍,并为实践提出建议。我们对 12 名女学生进行了个人半结构化在线访谈。每名学生都讨论了他们作为本科生或研究生参与残障服务的情况,每名学生都透露了自己的长期、非显性病症。通过主题分析,确定了三个主题。这三个主题分别是:(1)身份与合法性(残疾人身份认同、感知的合法性、证据的重要性);(2)知识与理解(对具体状况的了解、对残障服务的了解、对残障服务人员的了解和理解、对同伴的了解和理解);以及(3)独立与支持(对自主的渴望、自我倡导的重要性、额外支持)。研究结果强调了不同诊断结果的学生在接受大学残疾服务时所遇到的共同障碍。研究还提出了一系列改善残障服务的建议(例如,建议大学重新审视宣传残障服务所使用的语言)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信