Thromboelastography-Guided Anticoagulation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Mortality and Bleeding Outcomes

S. Duenas, J. Derfel, Margaret Gorlin, Serena Romano, Wei Huang, Alexander T Smith, Javier Ticona, Cristina Sison, Martin Lesser, Linda Shore-Lesserson, N. Hajizadeh, Janice Wang
{"title":"Thromboelastography-Guided Anticoagulation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Mortality and Bleeding Outcomes","authors":"S. Duenas, J. Derfel, Margaret Gorlin, Serena Romano, Wei Huang, Alexander T Smith, Javier Ticona, Cristina Sison, Martin Lesser, Linda Shore-Lesserson, N. Hajizadeh, Janice Wang","doi":"10.3390/jor4010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients was associated with increased mortality risk during the pandemic. This retrospective, observational study investigated whether the use of a thromboelastography (TEG)-guided anticoagulation protocol could decrease death and bleeding in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A TEG-guided protocol was instituted in one of two intensive care units. Primary outcomes of composite scores were the following: (0) major bleed and death; (1) death without major bleed; (2) major bleed without death; and (3) no bleed or death. Out of 134 patients, 67 in the TEG group were propensity matched to 67 in the comparator group based on age, gender, body mass index, presence of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and duration of non-invasive ventilation. There were no significant differences in rates of composite outcomes of bleeding or death in patients managed with or without a TEG-guided protocol (p = 0.22, Bowker symmetry testing). Out of the 67 patients in the TEG group, the TEG protocol led to anticoagulation change in 26 patients. Death was lower in this TEG-changed group (54%) compared to the comparator group (81%), although not significant (p = 0.07). TEG-guided protocol use did not reduce composite outcomes of death and bleeding, Future studies may further elucidate potential benefits.","PeriodicalId":284235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Respiration","volume":"20 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jor4010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients was associated with increased mortality risk during the pandemic. This retrospective, observational study investigated whether the use of a thromboelastography (TEG)-guided anticoagulation protocol could decrease death and bleeding in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A TEG-guided protocol was instituted in one of two intensive care units. Primary outcomes of composite scores were the following: (0) major bleed and death; (1) death without major bleed; (2) major bleed without death; and (3) no bleed or death. Out of 134 patients, 67 in the TEG group were propensity matched to 67 in the comparator group based on age, gender, body mass index, presence of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and duration of non-invasive ventilation. There were no significant differences in rates of composite outcomes of bleeding or death in patients managed with or without a TEG-guided protocol (p = 0.22, Bowker symmetry testing). Out of the 67 patients in the TEG group, the TEG protocol led to anticoagulation change in 26 patients. Death was lower in this TEG-changed group (54%) compared to the comparator group (81%), although not significant (p = 0.07). TEG-guided protocol use did not reduce composite outcomes of death and bleeding, Future studies may further elucidate potential benefits.
COVID-19 重症患者在血栓弹性成像指导下的抗凝治疗:死亡率和出血结果
COVID-19 大流行期间,COVID-19 患者的高凝状态与死亡风险增加有关。这项回顾性观察研究探讨了使用血栓弹性成像(TEG)指导的抗凝方案能否减少 COVID-19 重症患者的死亡和出血。两个重症监护病房中的一个采用了 TEG 指导方案。综合评分的主要结果如下:(0)大出血和死亡;(1)无大出血的死亡;(2)无死亡的大出血;(3)无出血或死亡。在 134 名患者中,根据年龄、性别、体重指数、是否患有慢性肾病、心血管疾病、糖尿病和无创通气时间,TEG 组的 67 名患者与对照组的 67 名患者进行了倾向匹配。在采用或未采用 TEG 指导方案的患者中,出血或死亡等综合结果的发生率无明显差异(P = 0.22,鲍克对称性检验)。在 TEG 组的 67 名患者中,有 26 名患者因 TEG 方案而改变了抗凝治疗方案。与对比组(81%)相比,TEG改变组的死亡人数较少(54%),但并不显著(p = 0.07)。使用 TEG 指导方案并未减少死亡和出血的综合结果,未来的研究可能会进一步阐明其潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信