Optimization Of CIPP Evaluation Model as An Escalation of Educational-Industrial Collaboration Program

Fahmi Rizal, U. Verawardina, Nadia Nadawina, Eddy Sutadji, Iwa Kuntadi, Mohd Nasrun Mohd Nawi
{"title":"Optimization Of CIPP Evaluation Model as An Escalation of Educational-Industrial Collaboration Program","authors":"Fahmi Rizal, U. Verawardina, Nadia Nadawina, Eddy Sutadji, Iwa Kuntadi, Mohd Nasrun Mohd Nawi","doi":"10.59953/paperasia.v39i6(b).44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of industrial and vocational collaboration in producing competent graduates is evident. However, there are still issues with the collaboration between industry and educational institutions, including the lack of appropriateness in the collaboration, the mismatch between student competencies in vocations and industry requirements, and inadequate alignment of graduate outcomes with industry needs. This research aims to explore the differing perspectives of universities, vocational schools, and industries in West Sumatra, Bandung, and Malang on the formation of CIPP components. Additionally, it seeks to reveal the direct and indirect influences between CIPP components—context, input, process, and product—to enhance the quality of cooperation and collaboration between industry and universities in Indonesia. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The samples include vocational schools, involving teachers and leaders, and universities, involving lecturers and leaders in West Sumatra, Bandung, and Malang. The research instruments consist of a questionnaire and an interview guide. Both qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques are applied, including descriptive analysis, difference tests using two-way ANOVA, and factor analysis tests using the SMART PLS application. Based on the findings, it is concluded that the evaluation results encompass the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) variables in an ideal vocational school-university-industry collaboration model. The results indicate a direct and indirect positive influence between CIPP components. However, the evaluation results also highlight existing problems, necessitating improvements. This research contributes by providing recommendations for the collaboration program to enhance input capacity and generate relevant outcomes. In terms of input, the value is classified as very good, emphasizing the need for improvement in the dimensions of the context components, especially the competency environment, stakeholders, and policies that support optimal cooperation. Recommendations in the product section aim to increase student competency achievement.","PeriodicalId":502806,"journal":{"name":"paperASIA","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"paperASIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v39i6(b).44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of industrial and vocational collaboration in producing competent graduates is evident. However, there are still issues with the collaboration between industry and educational institutions, including the lack of appropriateness in the collaboration, the mismatch between student competencies in vocations and industry requirements, and inadequate alignment of graduate outcomes with industry needs. This research aims to explore the differing perspectives of universities, vocational schools, and industries in West Sumatra, Bandung, and Malang on the formation of CIPP components. Additionally, it seeks to reveal the direct and indirect influences between CIPP components—context, input, process, and product—to enhance the quality of cooperation and collaboration between industry and universities in Indonesia. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. The samples include vocational schools, involving teachers and leaders, and universities, involving lecturers and leaders in West Sumatra, Bandung, and Malang. The research instruments consist of a questionnaire and an interview guide. Both qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques are applied, including descriptive analysis, difference tests using two-way ANOVA, and factor analysis tests using the SMART PLS application. Based on the findings, it is concluded that the evaluation results encompass the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) variables in an ideal vocational school-university-industry collaboration model. The results indicate a direct and indirect positive influence between CIPP components. However, the evaluation results also highlight existing problems, necessitating improvements. This research contributes by providing recommendations for the collaboration program to enhance input capacity and generate relevant outcomes. In terms of input, the value is classified as very good, emphasizing the need for improvement in the dimensions of the context components, especially the competency environment, stakeholders, and policies that support optimal cooperation. Recommendations in the product section aim to increase student competency achievement.
优化 CIPP 评估模式,将其作为教育与产业合作计划的升级版
产业与职业合作对于培养合格毕业生的重要性显而易见。然而,行业与教育机构之间的合作仍存在一些问题,包括合作缺乏适当性、学生的职业能力与行业要求不匹配、毕业生的成果与行业需求不一致等。本研究旨在探讨西苏门答腊、万隆和马朗的大学、职业学校和行业在形成 CIPP 要素方面的不同观点。此外,本研究还试图揭示 CIPP 要素(背景、输入、过程和产品)之间的直接和间接影响,以提高印尼产学合作的质量。研究采用混合方法,结合定量和定性方法。样本包括职业学校(涉及教师和领导)和大学(涉及西苏门答腊、万隆和玛琅的讲师和领导)。研究工具包括调查问卷和访谈指南。研究采用了定性和定量数据分析技术,包括描述性分析、使用双向方差分析进行差异检验,以及使用 SMART PLS 应用程序进行因子分析检验。根据研究结果,得出的结论是,评估结果包含了理想的职业学校-大学-产业合作模式中的情境、输入、过程、产品(CIPP)变量。结果表明,CIPP 各组成部分之间存在直接和间接的积极影响。然而,评估结果也凸显了存在的问题,需要加以改进。本研究的贡献在于为合作项目提供建议,以提高投入能力并产生相关成果。在投入方面,价值被归类为 "非常好",强调需要改进背景部分的各个维度,特别是支持最佳合作的能力环境、利益相关者和政策。产品部分的建议旨在提高学生的能力成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信