Cannabis Legalization: Social Risk Assessment and Economic Forecast

S. Mammadova, A. Guliyeva, T. Kvasnikova, A. Serebrennikova, Yuliya Tikhonova
{"title":"Cannabis Legalization: Social Risk Assessment and Economic Forecast","authors":"S. Mammadova, A. Guliyeva, T. Kvasnikova, A. Serebrennikova, Yuliya Tikhonova","doi":"10.1515/ael-2023-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper considers the problem of the economic feasibility of cannabis legalization in the Russian Federation. The paper also analyzes attitudes towards cannabis legalization among 584 residents (291 female and 293 male, 18.8 ± 1.4 for men, 18.3 ± 1.6 for women) from two different Russian regions (with the highest (Republic of Khakassia, Chelyabinsk Region, Moscow Region, Amur Region, and Saint-Petersburg) and lowest (Chukotka Autonomous District, Nenets Autonomous District, Chechen Republic, Arkhangelsk Region, and Orel Region) per capita drug use in the Russian Federation). All participants were interviewed via the Internet. In the first stage, a keyword analysis categorized articles into medical (48 %) and non-medical (52 %) cannabis use, revealing varied perspectives on its benefits and risks. The second stage surveyed Russian citizens, indicating regional differences in attitudes toward cannabis legalization based on per capita drug use. The third stage conducted a PEST analysis, highlighting economic consequences and offering recommendations. Practical implications include the need for targeted prevention programs, effective curriculum modules, and collaborative efforts to address the complex challenges associated with cannabis legalization. The study found that the public attitude towards the legalization of drugs for non-medical purposes is negative. In regions with the highest per capita soft drug use, the legalization of non-medical cannabis is unlikely to cause an increase in the level of usage. Teenagers living in regional centers tend to be more engaged in trying and using cannabis (11.9 %) compared to other cities (8.8 %, p ≤ 0.05) and rural areas, where the rate of cannabis use was the lowest (5.4 %, p ≤ 0.05). This research underscores the importance of tailored interventions and educational strategies to address diverse attitudes toward cannabis legalization. The findings contribute valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and health professionals, guiding the development of informed approaches to substance use prevention. The recommendations emphasize the necessity of proactive measures, such as outreach programs and collaborative efforts, to navigate the multifaceted implications of cannabis legalization and promote overall societal well-being.","PeriodicalId":503384,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2023-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The paper considers the problem of the economic feasibility of cannabis legalization in the Russian Federation. The paper also analyzes attitudes towards cannabis legalization among 584 residents (291 female and 293 male, 18.8 ± 1.4 for men, 18.3 ± 1.6 for women) from two different Russian regions (with the highest (Republic of Khakassia, Chelyabinsk Region, Moscow Region, Amur Region, and Saint-Petersburg) and lowest (Chukotka Autonomous District, Nenets Autonomous District, Chechen Republic, Arkhangelsk Region, and Orel Region) per capita drug use in the Russian Federation). All participants were interviewed via the Internet. In the first stage, a keyword analysis categorized articles into medical (48 %) and non-medical (52 %) cannabis use, revealing varied perspectives on its benefits and risks. The second stage surveyed Russian citizens, indicating regional differences in attitudes toward cannabis legalization based on per capita drug use. The third stage conducted a PEST analysis, highlighting economic consequences and offering recommendations. Practical implications include the need for targeted prevention programs, effective curriculum modules, and collaborative efforts to address the complex challenges associated with cannabis legalization. The study found that the public attitude towards the legalization of drugs for non-medical purposes is negative. In regions with the highest per capita soft drug use, the legalization of non-medical cannabis is unlikely to cause an increase in the level of usage. Teenagers living in regional centers tend to be more engaged in trying and using cannabis (11.9 %) compared to other cities (8.8 %, p ≤ 0.05) and rural areas, where the rate of cannabis use was the lowest (5.4 %, p ≤ 0.05). This research underscores the importance of tailored interventions and educational strategies to address diverse attitudes toward cannabis legalization. The findings contribute valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and health professionals, guiding the development of informed approaches to substance use prevention. The recommendations emphasize the necessity of proactive measures, such as outreach programs and collaborative efforts, to navigate the multifaceted implications of cannabis legalization and promote overall societal well-being.
大麻合法化:社会风险评估和经济预测
摘要 本文探讨了俄罗斯联邦大麻合法化的经济可行性问题。本文还分析了俄罗斯两个不同地区(俄罗斯联邦人均毒品使用量最高(哈卡斯共和国、车里雅宾斯克州、莫斯科州、阿穆尔州和圣彼得堡)和最低(楚科奇自治区、涅涅茨自治区、车臣共和国、阿尔汉格尔斯克州和奥廖尔州))的 584 名居民(291 名女性和 293 名男性,男性为 18.8 ± 1.4,女性为 18.3 ± 1.6)对大麻合法化的态度。所有参与者均通过互联网接受采访。在第一阶段,关键词分析将文章分为医用大麻(48%)和非医用大麻(52%),揭示了对大麻益处和风险的不同看法。第二阶段对俄罗斯公民进行了调查,根据人均毒品使用量显示出各地区对大麻合法化态度的差异。第三阶段进行了 PEST 分析,强调了经济后果并提出了建议。实际影响包括需要有针对性的预防计划、有效的课程模块,以及共同努力应对与大麻合法化相关的复杂挑战。研究发现,公众对非医疗用途毒品合法化持消极态度。在软性毒品人均使用量最高的地区,非医用大麻合法化不太可能导致使用量增加。与其他城市(8.8%,p ≤ 0.05)和大麻使用率最低的农村地区(5.4%,p ≤ 0.05)相比,生活在地区中心的青少年往往更倾向于尝试和使用大麻(11.9%)。这项研究强调了针对不同人群对大麻合法化的态度采取有针对性的干预措施和教育策略的重要性。研究结果为政策制定者、教育工作者和卫生专业人员提供了宝贵的见解,为制定预防药物使用的明智方法提供了指导。这些建议强调有必要采取积极主动的措施,如外联计划和合作努力,以应对大麻合法化的多方面影响,促进整体社会福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信